本文選題：國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局 + 低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)　； 參考：《中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境》2017年09期

【摘要】：有別于單純的"區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)"模式,國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局逐漸成為新形勢(shì)下我國(guó)區(qū)域發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)和前提,區(qū)域開發(fā)應(yīng)滿足前者的基本要求。本文根據(jù)各省基于縣級(jí)單元的主體功能區(qū)劃,以2010年為基年,通過建立人口、經(jīng)濟(jì)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和溫室氣體排放等多層次指標(biāo)體系,評(píng)價(jià)"十二五"時(shí)期我國(guó)區(qū)域低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)與國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的進(jìn)展程度。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),城市化地區(qū)(重點(diǎn)開發(fā)區(qū)和優(yōu)化開發(fā)區(qū))以占不到18%的國(guó)土面積,集聚了1/2以上的人口和3/4的經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)出;農(nóng)產(chǎn)品主產(chǎn)區(qū)的面積占比超過1/4,人口比例接近1/3;重點(diǎn)生態(tài)功能區(qū)面積比例接近56%,人口比例低于10%。2010—2014年,從全國(guó)范圍看,各類主體功能區(qū)的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)與其功能定位基本吻合,表現(xiàn)為優(yōu)化開發(fā)區(qū)、農(nóng)產(chǎn)品主產(chǎn)區(qū)和重點(diǎn)生態(tài)功能區(qū)的人口和經(jīng)濟(jì)集聚度均有微降,而重點(diǎn)開發(fā)區(qū)有所上升;各區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)均有所優(yōu)化,但農(nóng)產(chǎn)品主產(chǎn)區(qū)和重點(diǎn)生態(tài)功能區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整的幅度小于城市化地區(qū)。具體到各省,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)本文所研究的"協(xié)調(diào)性"進(jìn)展與傳統(tǒng)意義上的東、中、西區(qū)域劃分和發(fā)展水平并無直接關(guān)系,例如同為東部地區(qū)的京津冀三地,協(xié)調(diào)性進(jìn)展有顯著差異,也顯示出三地協(xié)同發(fā)展的難度。相反,一些慣常認(rèn)為發(fā)展較為落后的省區(qū),例如河北、青海、山西等地,在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局的協(xié)調(diào)性方面所付出的努力和成效走在前列。部分地區(qū)低碳發(fā)展與其國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局呈現(xiàn)出相對(duì)不協(xié)調(diào)的態(tài)勢(shì),主要表現(xiàn)為農(nóng)產(chǎn)品主產(chǎn)區(qū)和重點(diǎn)生態(tài)保護(hù)區(qū)都出現(xiàn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)集聚度上升、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)劣化、CO_2排放大幅度上升、排放強(qiáng)度甚至也上升的趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Different from the simple pattern of "regional competition", the pattern of land and space development has gradually become the foundation and premise of regional development in China under the new situation, and regional development should meet the basic requirements of the former. In this paper, according to the main functional divisions of the provinces based on the county units, and taking 2010 as the base year, through the establishment of population, economy, industrial structure and greenhouse gas emissions, and other multi-level indicator system, This paper evaluates the development of regional low-carbon economy and territorial and spatial development pattern in the 12th Five-Year Plan period. The study found that urbanization areas (key development zones and optimized development zones) accounted for less than 18% of the land area, gathered more than 1 / 2 of the population and 3 / 4 of economic output; The area of the main producing areas of agricultural products accounts for more than a quarter, and the proportion of the population is close to one third; the proportion of the key ecological functional areas is close to 56; the proportion of the population is lower than 10.2010-2014. From a nationwide perspective, the development situation of various main functional areas basically coincides with their functional orientation. The main agricultural production areas and the key ecological functional areas have a slight decline in population and economic concentration, while key development zones have increased, and the industrial structure of each region has been optimized. But the range of industrial structure adjustment in the main agricultural production area and the key ecological function area is smaller than that in the urbanization area. In each province, it is found that the progress of "coordination" studied in this paper is not directly related to the division and development level of the eastern, central and western regions in the traditional sense. For example, there are significant differences in the progress of coordination among the three places of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, which are also in the eastern region. It also shows the difficulty of coordinated development among the three places. On the contrary, some provinces and autonomous regions, such as Hebei, Qinghai, Shanxi, and so on, have made great efforts and achievements in coordinating economic development with the pattern of land and space development. The low carbon development in some areas and the pattern of land and space development in some areas show a relatively incongruous trend, mainly manifested in the increase of economic concentration in the main producing areas of agricultural products and the key ecological protection areas, and the substantial increase in the emission of CO _ 2 from the deterioration of industrial structure. Emission intensity is even rising.
【作者單位】： 國(guó)家發(fā)展和改革委員會(huì)能源研究所;中國(guó)21世紀(jì)議程管理中心;中國(guó)科學(xué)研究院地理科學(xué)與資源研究所;國(guó)務(wù)院參事室;
【基金】：中國(guó)清潔發(fā)展基金贈(zèng)款項(xiàng)目“典型國(guó)家適應(yīng)氣候變化方案研究與中國(guó)適應(yīng)策略和行動(dòng)方案”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2013034),“低碳發(fā)展區(qū)域政策與國(guó)土空間開發(fā)格局的協(xié)調(diào)性研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2014074) 2016年國(guó)家重點(diǎn)研發(fā)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目“國(guó)家及主要區(qū)域空氣質(zhì)量改善路線圖研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2016YFC0207503)
【分類號(hào)】：F124.5;F205

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 喻鋒;張麗君;;遵循生態(tài)文明理念,加強(qiáng)國(guó)土空間規(guī)劃[J];國(guó)土資源情報(bào);2013年02期

2 張永輝;;國(guó)土空間主體功能區(qū)規(guī)劃視野下住宅用地制度創(chuàng)新[J];荊楚理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年11期

3 陳述;;簡(jiǎn)述邊疆地區(qū)建設(shè)生態(tài)文明中的優(yōu)化國(guó)土空間舉措——以云南省德宏州為例[J];今日中國(guó)論壇;2013年08期

4 陳吉寧;;五大區(qū)域戰(zhàn)略環(huán)評(píng)是踐行生態(tài)文明建設(shè)的重要舉措[J];環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià);2013年05期

5 ;我國(guó)首部全國(guó)性國(guó)土空間開發(fā)規(guī)劃公布[J];城市規(guī)劃通訊;2011年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)編輯部;倍加珍惜我們寶貴的國(guó)土空間[N];中國(guó)礦業(yè)報(bào);2012年

2 楊偉民;區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的再認(rèn)識(shí)[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年

3 常菁;國(guó)土空間分類開發(fā)中部崛起是重頭[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

4 記者　 陳孟陽;我國(guó)將對(duì)國(guó)土空間分類[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2006年

5 袁國(guó)華　鄭娟?duì)?賈立斌 王世虎;國(guó)土空間開發(fā)須考慮資源環(huán)境承載力[N];中國(guó)國(guó)土資源報(bào);2013年

6 北京市國(guó)土資源局豐臺(tái)分局;優(yōu)化國(guó)土空間格局 建設(shè)生態(tài)文明之城[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

7 荊杰;我國(guó)首個(gè)全國(guó)性國(guó)土空間開發(fā)規(guī)劃出臺(tái)[N];建筑時(shí)報(bào);2011年

8 陳孟陽;我國(guó)將對(duì)國(guó)土空間分類規(guī)劃并實(shí)行差別績(jī)效考核[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2006年

9 本報(bào)評(píng)論員;樹立“綠色”政績(jī)觀[N];延邊日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2014年

10 ;生態(tài)文明,扮靚“美麗中國(guó)”[N];中國(guó)國(guó)土資源報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鄧焱;山地丘陵地區(qū)國(guó)土空間開發(fā)適宜性評(píng)價(jià)及功能分區(qū)研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2016年

2 周陽;基于限制開發(fā)區(qū)的湖北省五峰縣國(guó)土空間格局優(yōu)化研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2079769