本文選題：G20 + 機(jī)制化建設(shè)��； 參考：《對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：G20從成立開始就被定義為“布雷頓森林體系內(nèi)部的非正式對話機(jī)制”，然而在起初的十余年中，G20作為一種危機(jī)應(yīng)對及預(yù)防機(jī)制在國際治理中一直處于邊緣化地位。2008美國金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)，并迅速蔓延至全球，對世界經(jīng)濟(jì)造成巨大影響。傳統(tǒng)的國際治理機(jī)制---七國集團(tuán)和其主要執(zhí)行機(jī)構(gòu)IMF未能發(fā)揮應(yīng)有作用，而G20卻一躍成為應(yīng)對這場危機(jī)的最核心治理機(jī)制，并迅速升級為峰會，在匹茲堡峰會后開始取代G7成為國際經(jīng)濟(jì)對話的首要平臺。 迄今為止，G20已成功召開了8次領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人峰會，在應(yīng)對全球金融危機(jī)方面取得了明顯成效。但另一方面，在后危機(jī)時(shí)代，G20也面臨著如何從危機(jī)應(yīng)對機(jī)制過渡為長效治理機(jī)制及如何進(jìn)行機(jī)制化建設(shè)等問題。有關(guān)G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)這一課題無疑具有豐富的理論和實(shí)踐意義。 對G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)進(jìn)行研究將豐富相關(guān)學(xué)科的理論背景，提供更多的分析框架和批判視角。首先，G20機(jī)制研究可進(jìn)一步豐富“國際制度該如何設(shè)計(jì)”這一課題；其次，G20機(jī)制研究可反映出國際格局最新變化并推動重要國際經(jīng)濟(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)改革進(jìn)程；第三，G20機(jī)制研究可反映全球治理機(jī)制發(fā)展趨勢及發(fā)展相關(guān)理論；第四，G20機(jī)制研究可為國際宏觀政策協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制建設(shè)、國際貨幣體系改革等現(xiàn)實(shí)操作提供新思路。 G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)研究不僅具有豐富的理論意涵，也具有十分緊迫的實(shí)踐意義。其一，G20機(jī)制研究可為其未來發(fā)展方向和方式提供新思路；其二，對G20機(jī)制的研究有利于中國積極地參與國際事務(wù)，實(shí)現(xiàn)國家利益。因此，對G20進(jìn)行深入研究符合我國發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略，深遠(yuǎn)的實(shí)踐意義不言而喻。 綜合對國內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn)的整理分析以及本文設(shè)定的思路框架，筆者在研究中著重關(guān)注如下幾點(diǎn)：一是尋找新的切入點(diǎn)，如從國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、國際法等跨學(xué)科的角度進(jìn)行思考。力求從一個(gè)有新意的角度重新審視G20的成立、發(fā)展、機(jī)制化建設(shè)，填補(bǔ)國內(nèi)相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的空白；二是著重關(guān)注G20作為一個(gè)國際機(jī)制的內(nèi)在發(fā)展規(guī)律，如其內(nèi)部矛盾（成員國間的利益訴求博弈）、內(nèi)在動力（成員國共同利益）、與其他國際機(jī)制的關(guān)系、機(jī)制化的理由問題，以此豐富有關(guān)國際機(jī)制的研究；三是注意使用科學(xué)的研究方法，如定性與歷史分析相結(jié)合、經(jīng)濟(jì)視角和政治視角相統(tǒng)一的方法，并嘗試運(yùn)用利益分析等研究方法，盡量避免研究出現(xiàn)深度不足、過于主觀化等問題。 在對G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)進(jìn)行研究的過程中，關(guān)于國際機(jī)制與國際組織的理論占有重要地位，因此本文先從全球經(jīng)濟(jì)治理理論綜述入手，在研究相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上，在更深刻的層面闡述G20問題，整個(gè)理論框架共分為三個(gè)方面：一是以世界體系的相關(guān)概念為原點(diǎn)展開理論框架的闡述；二是從國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)角度研究G20為什么要機(jī)制化；三是從國際法角度研究該機(jī)制應(yīng)如何設(shè)計(jì)。 G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)是一個(gè)復(fù)雜問題，在機(jī)制化路線的設(shè)計(jì)過程中，本文還廣泛吸取其他國際機(jī)制的驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn)，對硬法性WTO和軟性機(jī)制G7、APEC進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)比較，為G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)的性質(zhì)定位提供了更加豐富的實(shí)踐背景。 在研究了相關(guān)國際機(jī)制理論和其他國際機(jī)制的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)后，筆者運(yùn)用定性與歷史分析相結(jié)合、經(jīng)濟(jì)視角與政治視角相統(tǒng)一的研究方法，對G20作為一個(gè)國際機(jī)制的歷史背景、存在基礎(chǔ)及內(nèi)在矛盾與發(fā)展動力展開深入解讀，并對G20的性質(zhì)作出明確定位。 分析G20內(nèi)、外部的矛盾離不開對其成員國的深入探究，本文進(jìn)而對G20成員國的利益訴求及各方互動進(jìn)行了深入探討，更從博弈視角下論證了G20未來機(jī)制化面臨的國際關(guān)系基礎(chǔ)，以此形成G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)可能性和可行性分析的重要實(shí)踐參考。 有了以上這些研究作為基礎(chǔ)，筆者對G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)的可能性及可行性進(jìn)行論證分析，更從國際軟法角度論證了G20作為國際治理機(jī)制的法律框架選擇。國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視角涉及G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)的內(nèi)容和實(shí)質(zhì)，而國際法視角則是前者的具體外在形式，此內(nèi)容適合于此形式，G20研究框架下二者的結(jié)合相得益彰。 本著客觀與創(chuàng)新的原則，本文對G20未來的機(jī)制化路線提出具體設(shè)計(jì)方案，將G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)劃分為軟性非正式階段、軟性半機(jī)制化階段和“軟硬兼施”機(jī)制化階段等三個(gè)階段： 軟性非正式階段的主要任務(wù)是通過具體準(zhǔn)備工作，為軟性半機(jī)制化建設(shè)作出前期鋪墊。2013年圣彼得堡峰會業(yè)已明確提出經(jīng)濟(jì)復(fù)蘇的主要任務(wù)：“如何啟動投資這一發(fā)展引擎以及如何通過搭建國際金融架構(gòu)并預(yù)防可導(dǎo)致新危機(jī)的經(jīng)濟(jì)失衡，達(dá)到降低風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的目的�！北疚慕宕藢⑹ケ说帽し鍟鳛闄C(jī)制化建設(shè)的正式開端。 軟性半機(jī)制化階段是G20著眼于未來長效全球統(tǒng)籌機(jī)制使命,向半機(jī)制化階段過渡是一條必由之路，即首先強(qiáng)化G20組織架構(gòu)及議題專門化設(shè)置，這也同時(shí)符合G20機(jī)制軟法性特征的形成規(guī)律，即軟法機(jī)制的成型須經(jīng)由程序化、透明化、規(guī)范化和制度化等一系列完整程序。其中，組織架構(gòu)建設(shè)主要集中于固定秘書處的設(shè)置論證，為了力求本研究的客觀性，筆者將此預(yù)設(shè)為備選方案進(jìn)行可行性分析，，以便讀者作出獨(dú)立判斷和甄別。議題建設(shè)專門化設(shè)置分為三個(gè)步驟：經(jīng)濟(jì)議題專門化、金融議題專門化、議題建設(shè)多元化。 “軟硬兼施”的機(jī)制化階段重點(diǎn)從五方面展開G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)方案：1.逐步擴(kuò)展、開放議題領(lǐng)域；2.嚴(yán)格成員國準(zhǔn)入制度；3. G20決策機(jī)制構(gòu)建；4.多層級會晤與協(xié)商框架構(gòu)建；5.G20決議執(zhí)行機(jī)制構(gòu)建；6.相互評估程序構(gòu)建。 中國作為G20成員國之一，其行為將對G20機(jī)制的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生重要影響；同樣，G20作為中國參與國際事務(wù)最有效的平臺，其發(fā)展也將對中國產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)影響。本文最后一章著重從中國視角對G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)提出觀點(diǎn)，即G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)中的中國戰(zhàn)略，從中國的態(tài)度和立場、G20機(jī)制化對于中國的潛在利益、G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)對于中國的制約因素和潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等展開論述，并提出中國對于G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)的應(yīng)對戰(zhàn)略。 世界政治多極化和經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化浪潮勢不可擋，金融、貿(mào)易、投資等經(jīng)濟(jì)議題以及能源安全、氣候變化、糧食安全、反恐等安全挑戰(zhàn)日益不可分割，G20峰會為全球性問題提供了最佳溝通平臺。然而由于各國經(jīng)濟(jì)訴求不同，各集團(tuán)綜合實(shí)力各異，以及世界格局的風(fēng)云變幻，各方利益的交織與博弈往往很難最終取得共贏結(jié)果。如何克服這一治理困境以保障世界經(jīng)濟(jì)永續(xù)發(fā)展，是G20機(jī)制化建設(shè)過程中需要深刻思考及永續(xù)關(guān)注的一項(xiàng)議題。
[Abstract]:From the beginning of its founding, G20 was defined as an informal dialogue mechanism within the Bretton Woods system. However, in the first decade, G20, as a crisis response and prevention mechanism, has been marginalized in international governance and.2008 financial crisis broke out in the United States and spread rapidly to the world and has a great impact on the world economy. The traditional international governance mechanism, the group of seven and its main executive agency, IMF failed to play its part, and G20 has become the most core governance mechanism for the crisis and quickly upgraded to a summit. After the Pittsburgh summit, it began to take the place of G7 as the first platform for international economic dialogue.
So far, G20 has successfully held 8 summit meetings, and has achieved remarkable results in dealing with the global financial crisis. On the other hand, in the post crisis era, G20 also faces the problems of how to transition from the crisis response mechanism to the long-term governance mechanism and how to carry out the construction of the mechanism. The issue of the construction of the G20 mechanism is undoubtedly an issue. It has rich theoretical and practical significance.
The research on the construction of G20 will enrich the theoretical background of relevant disciplines and provide more analytical framework and critical perspective. First, the research of G20 mechanism can further enrich the subject of "how to design international system". Secondly, the research of the G20 mechanism can reflect the latest changes in the international pattern and promote the reform of the important international economic institutions. Process; third, G20 mechanism research can reflect the development trend of global governance mechanism and development related theories. Fourth, the study of G20 mechanism can provide new ideas for the construction of international macro policy coordination mechanism and the reform of international monetary system.
G20 mechanism construction research not only has rich theoretical meaning, but also has very urgent practical significance. First, the research of G20 mechanism can provide new ideas for its future development direction and way. Secondly, the study of the G20 mechanism is beneficial to China's active participation in international affairs and the reality of the national interests. Therefore, the in-depth study of the G20 is consistent with that. The practical significance of our development strategy is self-evident.
In this study, the author focuses on the following points: first, to find new entry points, such as the interdisciplinary perspective of international political economy and international law, and try to reexamine the establishment, development and mechanism of G20 from a new angle. To fill in the gaps in the domestic related fields; two is to focus on the internal development law of G20 as an international mechanism, such as its internal contradictions (the game of interest demands among the Member States), the internal motivation (the common interests of the Member States), the relationship with other international mechanisms, the rationalization of the rationalization of the problem, and the study of the international mechanism; three Pay attention to the use of scientific research methods, such as the combination of qualitative and historical analysis, the economic perspective and political angle of view, and try to use the research methods of interest analysis, and try to avoid the problems of lack of depth, too subjective.
In the process of research on the construction of G20, the theory of international mechanism and international organization occupies an important position. This article begins with the overview of the global economic governance theory and expounds the G20 problem on the basis of the related theories. The whole framework of the theory is divided into three aspects: one is the world system. The relevant concepts are elaborated for the theoretical framework of origin; two is the study of why G20 is institutionalized from the perspective of international political economics; and the three is to study how the mechanism should be designed from the perspective of international law.
The construction of G20 mechanism is a complicated problem. In the process of designing the mechanism route, this paper also draws the experience and lessons of other international mechanisms, compares the hard WTO with the soft mechanism G7, APEC, and provides a more rich practical background for the nature orientation of the construction of G20 mechanism.
After studying the experiences and lessons of the relevant international mechanism theory and other international mechanisms, the author uses the combination of qualitative and historical analysis, the economic perspective and the political perspective to unify the historical background of G20 as an international mechanism, and unscramble the basic and internal contradictions and development motive, and make a study of the nature of the G20. Make a clear position.
In the analysis of G20, the external contradiction can not be separated from the deep exploration of its member countries. This article further discusses the interests demand and interaction of the G20 member countries, and demonstrates the international relationship basis of the future mechanism of G20 from the perspective of the game, so as to form the important practical reference of the possibility and feasibility analysis of the construction of G20. Exam.
With these studies as the basis, the author demonstrates the possibility and feasibility of the construction of G20, and demonstrates the choice of the legal framework of G20 as an international governance mechanism from the perspective of international soft law. The perspective of international political economics involves the content and essence of the construction of the mechanism of G20, while the perspective of international law is the concrete of the former. The external form is suitable for this form. The combination of the two elements in the G20 research framework complement each other.
In accordance with the principle of objective and innovation, this paper puts forward specific design plans for the future mechanism of G20, and divides the G20 mechanism into three stages: soft informal stage, soft semi mechanism stage and "soft and hard work" mechanism stage.
The main task of the soft informal phase is to make a preliminary paving for soft and semi institutionalized construction through specific preparatory work. The St Petersburg summit in St Petersburg has made clear the main task of economic recovery: "how to start the investment engine and how to build the international financial architecture and prevent the new crisis." In order to achieve the goal of reducing risks, we use the St Petersburg summit as the formal start of the institutionalization.
The soft semi mechanism phase is the mission of G20 to focus on the future long-term global co-ordination mechanism. The transition to the semi mechanism phase is the only way, that is, to strengthen the G20 organizational structure and the specialized setting of the issues, which also conforms to the formation law of the soft legal characteristics of the G20 mechanism, that is, the forming of the soft law mechanism must be programmed, transparent and standardized. In order to strive for the objectivity of the study, the author makes the feasibility analysis of the presupposition for the alternative, so that the reader can judge and discriminate independently. The special setting of the issue construction is divided into three steps: economic discussion. Specialization of topics, specialization of financial topics and diversification of topics.
The institutionalization stage of "soft and hard work" is focused on five aspects of the G20 mechanism construction program: 1. gradual expansion, open issue area; 2. strict member countries access system; 3. G20 decision-making mechanism construction; 4. multi-level meeting and consultation framework construction; construction of 5.G20 resolution implementation mechanism; 6. mutual evaluation procedure construction.
As one of the G20 member countries, China's behavior will have an important impact on the development of the G20 mechanism. Similarly, as the most effective platform for China's participation in international affairs, G20 will have a far-reaching impact on China. The last chapter of this paper puts forward a point of view on the construction of G20 mechanism from the perspective of China, that is, the Chinese strategy in the construction of G20 mechanism. From China's attitude and position, the G20 mechanism for China's potential benefits, the construction of G20 mechanism for China's constraints and potential risks and other issues, and put forward China's strategy for the construction of the G20 mechanism.
The global political polarization and economic globalization are unstoppable. Economic issues such as finance, trade, investment and other economic issues, as well as security challenges, such as energy security, climate change, food security and counter-terrorism, are increasingly inseparable. The G20 summit provides the best communication platform for global problems. However, because of the different economic demands of countries, the comprehensive strength of each group is different, As well as the changes in the world pattern, the interweave and game of the interests of all parties are often difficult to achieve a win-win result. How to overcome this dilemma in order to ensure the sustainable development of the world economy is an issue that needs deep thinking and perpetual attention in the process of building the G20 mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F114.4;F116

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 雨思;沙特人口、勞力結(jié)構(gòu)和就業(yè)狀況[J];阿拉伯世界;2004年02期

2 李小軍;;論二戰(zhàn)后土耳其中東政策的演變[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2011年03期

3 朱杰進(jìn);;二十國集團(tuán)的定位與機(jī)制建設(shè)[J];阿拉伯世界研究;2012年03期

4 馬其家;;美國金融穩(wěn)定監(jiān)管委員會及啟示[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

5 王義德;“世界格局”應(yīng)作何理解?[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;1997年02期

6 陳衍德;全球化格局中的東南亞穆斯林[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2005年03期

7 陳素權(quán);;二十國集團(tuán)在全球治理結(jié)構(gòu)中的角色分析[J];東南亞縱橫;2010年10期

8 李因才;;結(jié)構(gòu)變遷與治理制度的演化:從G7到G20[J];當(dāng)代世界社會主義問題;2011年04期

9 左海聰;;國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法基本問題論綱[J];法學(xué)評論;2009年01期

10 李仁真;劉真;;金融穩(wěn)定論壇機(jī)制及其重構(gòu)的法律透視[J];法學(xué)評論;2010年02期

本文編號：2037969