本文選題：對外直接投資 + 產(chǎn)能過剩��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中國經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)入新常態(tài),中國工業(yè)的產(chǎn)能過剩問題日益嚴(yán)峻,由潛在、局部階段性過剩轉(zhuǎn)化為實(shí)際、全局長期性過剩。而嚴(yán)重的產(chǎn)能過剩極有可能導(dǎo)致我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)被低端鎖定,陷入“中等收入陷阱”。在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展新常態(tài)的背景下,針對較多行業(yè)出現(xiàn)的嚴(yán)重產(chǎn)能過剩現(xiàn)象,實(shí)踐證明通過增加基礎(chǔ)投資和挖掘國內(nèi)消費(fèi)需求來化解過剩產(chǎn)能的治理效果有限,國家決定通過實(shí)施新的對外開放戰(zhàn)略,借助“一帶一路”,通過對外直接投資尋求與“一帶一路”相關(guān)國家進(jìn)行國際產(chǎn)能合作,利用國際市場化解產(chǎn)能過剩,推動國內(nèi)產(chǎn)能走出去。這是我國解決產(chǎn)能過剩問題的一種新思路。無疑,走出國門的對外直接投資如何化解產(chǎn)能過剩?其政策效果如何?不同類型行業(yè)的對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能過剩的化解效果有何差異?我國如何利用“一帶一路”政策實(shí)施對外直接投資來化解產(chǎn)能過剩?這些都已成為現(xiàn)階段值得研究的問題。本文基于產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移理論、發(fā)展中國家對外直接投資理論,構(gòu)建了理論分析框架,著力研究對外直接投資化解過剩產(chǎn)能的機(jī)制,從微觀上分析了不同類型的OFDI化解產(chǎn)能過剩的機(jī)制,在宏觀上從產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移效應(yīng)、產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)效應(yīng)和產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)競爭效應(yīng)三個方面分析了 OFDI化解產(chǎn)能過剩的機(jī)制。本文首先利用隨機(jī)前沿生產(chǎn)函數(shù)法對我國36個工業(yè)行業(yè)的產(chǎn)能利用率進(jìn)行測度,以此度量行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩程度,分析了中國工業(yè)行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過�，F(xiàn)狀。然后,以估計(jì)的產(chǎn)能利用率作為被解釋變量,通過動態(tài)面板估計(jì)方法(SYS GMM)實(shí)證分析了 OFDI對產(chǎn)能過剩的化解作用,并利用交互項(xiàng)分析了產(chǎn)能過剩其他可作為產(chǎn)業(yè)特征的影響因素對OFDI的產(chǎn)能過�；庾饔玫挠绊憽＝Y(jié)合理論分析與實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,本文得出以下結(jié)論:1、我國工業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩形勢嚴(yán)峻,向全局性過剩發(fā)展。我國的自來水的生產(chǎn)和供應(yīng)業(yè)、煤氣的生產(chǎn)和供應(yīng)業(yè)、煤炭采選業(yè)、印刷業(yè)和記錄媒介的復(fù)制、石油加工煉焦及核燃料加工業(yè)、化學(xué)纖維制造業(yè)、電力.熱力的生產(chǎn)和供應(yīng)業(yè)、黑色金屬冶煉及壓延加工業(yè)等23個工業(yè)行業(yè)面臨嚴(yán)重產(chǎn)能過剩。從行業(yè)大類來看,電力、燃?xì)夂退纳a(chǎn)及供應(yīng)業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩指數(shù)最高,采礦業(yè)高度產(chǎn)能過�，F(xiàn)象也較為嚴(yán)重,而制造業(yè)僅部分行業(yè)高度產(chǎn)能過剩,總體產(chǎn)能過剩現(xiàn)象最輕。2、對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能利用率持正向影響,對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能過剩具有一定的化解作用。進(jìn)一步利用交互項(xiàng)分析產(chǎn)能過剩其他可作為產(chǎn)業(yè)特征的影響因素對OFDI化解產(chǎn)能過剩效果的影響,我們發(fā)現(xiàn):創(chuàng)新投入比重增加會強(qiáng)化對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能過剩的化解作用,代表創(chuàng)新投入比重高的高技術(shù)行業(yè)的對外直接投資對該行業(yè)的產(chǎn)能過剩的化解效果更強(qiáng);行業(yè)壟斷程度提高會增強(qiáng)對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能過剩的化解作用,代表壟斷程度高的行業(yè)的對外直接投資對該行業(yè)的產(chǎn)能過剩的化解效果更強(qiáng);國內(nèi)投資比重提高會弱化對外直接投資對產(chǎn)能過剩的化解作用,代表國內(nèi)投資比重較高的行業(yè)的對外直接投資對該行業(yè)的產(chǎn)能過剩的化解效果更弱。最后,針對我國目前對外直接投資與產(chǎn)能過剩的現(xiàn)狀,結(jié)合本文對OFDI化解過剩產(chǎn)能的理論與實(shí)證的研究,就如何通過對外直接投資化解產(chǎn)能過剩提出了六條政策建議。依托“一帶一路”制定境外直接投資戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃,為化解產(chǎn)能過剩提供政策支持;加大創(chuàng)新投入,鼓勵高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)的對外直接投資;轉(zhuǎn)變行業(yè)投資結(jié)構(gòu),減少國內(nèi)投資,增加對外直接投資的比重;推進(jìn)全面深化改革,化解體制性產(chǎn)能過剩;發(fā)揮和強(qiáng)化國際經(jīng)貿(mào)平臺,帶動過剩產(chǎn)能轉(zhuǎn)移;利用“一帶一路”資金融通戰(zhàn)略,為化解過剩產(chǎn)能提供資金支持。
[Abstract]:With the Chinese economy entering a new normal state, the problem of overcapacity in China's industry is becoming more and more severe, which is transformed from potential, partial surplus to reality, and the overall overcapacity is over the long term. And the serious overcapacity is likely to lead to the low end of China's economy and a "middle income trap". Serious overcapacity industries appeared, proved by increasing infrastructure investment and mining of domestic consumer demand to resolve the overcapacity governance effect is limited, the state decided through the implementation of the new strategy of opening to the outside world, with the help of "The Belt and Road, through foreign direct investment and seeking" The Belt and Road National International It is a new idea to solve the problem of overcapacity in China. It is a new idea to solve the problem of overcapacity in China. No doubt, how does the foreign direct investment out of the country resolve overcapacity? How is the effect of its policy? How does the effect of FDI to overcapacity in different types of industries be poor In China? How to use "the implementation of foreign direct investment to resolve the overcapacity The Belt and Road" policy? These have become the current problem worthy of study. This paper based on the theory of industrial transfer to developing countries, foreign direct investment theory, construct a theoretical analysis framework, the capacity of foreign direct investment mechanism to resolve overcapacity, This paper analyzes the mechanism of different types of OFDI dissolving overcapacity from microcosmic, and analyzes the mechanism of OFDI dissolving excess capacity from three aspects: industrial transfer effect, industrial association effect and intra industry competition effect. First of all, this paper uses random frontier production function method to measure the productivity utilization ratio of 36 industrial industries in China. In order to measure the excess capacity of industry, this paper analyzes the current situation of overcapacity in China's industrial industry. Then, using the estimated productivity utilization as an explanatory variable, the SYS GMM is used to analyze the dissolving effect of OFDI on overcapacity, and the other can be used to analyze the other industrial characteristics of excess capacity. Influence factors on the overcapacity of OFDI. Combining theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: 1, China's industrial overcapacity situation is severe, to global surplus development. The production and supply of tap water in China, coal gas production and supply, coal mining, printing and recording media are complex. 23 industrial industries, such as the production and supply industry such as ferrous metal smelting and calendering and processing industry, are facing serious overcapacity in the production and supply industry of the chemical fiber manufacturing industry, the chemical fiber manufacturing industry, the electric power, the thermal production and supply industry, the black metal smelting and the calendering and processing industries. The image is also more serious, and the manufacturing industry is only part of the industry high capacity overcapacity, the overall overcapacity phenomenon is the lightest.2, the foreign direct investment has a positive impact on the productivity utilization, and the foreign direct investment has a certain dissolving effect on the overcapacity. FDI defuses the effect of overcapacity, we find that the increase in the proportion of innovation investment will strengthen the dissolving effect of foreign direct investment on overcapacity. The foreign direct investment of high technology industry, which represents high proportion of innovation investment, has a stronger effect on the overcapacity of the industry; the increase of industry monopoly will enhance foreign direct investment. The dissolving effect on overcapacity is that the foreign direct investment, which represents high monopoly industries, has a stronger effect on the overcapacity of the industry, and the increase in the proportion of domestic investment will weaken the dissolving effect of foreign direct investment on overcapacity. Finally, in view of the current situation of our country's current FDI and overcapacity, and combining the theoretical and Empirical Study of OFDI to dissolve excess capacity, this paper puts forward six policy suggestions on how to resolve overcapacity through foreign direct investment. To provide policy support for overcapacity overcapacity, increase innovation investment, encourage foreign direct investment in high-tech industries, change industry investment structure, reduce domestic investment and increase the proportion of foreign direct investment; promote comprehensive deepening of reform, disintegrate and disintegrate production capacity overcapacity; play and strengthen the international economic and trade platform to promote the transfer of surplus capacity; "Belt and Road Initiative" financing strategy, in order to resolve the excess capacity to provide financial support.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F424;F125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林毅夫;巫和懋;邢亦青;;“潮涌現(xiàn)象”與產(chǎn)能過剩的形成機(jī)制[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué);2010年00期

2 韓國高;高鐵梅;王立國;齊鷹飛;王曉姝;;中國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩的測度、波動及成因研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年12期

3 黃衛(wèi)挺;;產(chǎn)能過剩是市場經(jīng)濟(jì)常見現(xiàn)象[J];中國投資;2011年11期

4 周勁;付保宗;;產(chǎn)能過剩的內(nèi)涵、評價體系及在我國工業(yè)領(lǐng)域的表現(xiàn)特征[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài);2011年10期

5 王立國;趙琳;高越青;;謹(jǐn)防風(fēng)電設(shè)備、多晶硅行業(yè)性產(chǎn)能過剩的風(fēng)險[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年05期

6 耿強(qiáng);江飛濤;傅坦;;政策性補(bǔ)貼、產(chǎn)能過剩與中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)波動——引入產(chǎn)能利用率RBC模型的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年05期

7 陳詩一;;中國工業(yè)分行業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)估算:1980—2008[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2011年03期

8 付保宗;郭海濤;;美日的產(chǎn)能過剩及應(yīng)對措施[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2011年03期

9 王立國;張日旭;;財(cái)政分權(quán)背景下的產(chǎn)能過剩問題研究——基于鋼鐵行業(yè)的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2010年12期

10 劉曄;葛維琦;;產(chǎn)能過剩評估指標(biāo)體系及預(yù)警制度研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2010年11期

，

本文編號：2037616