本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)政策 + 國有企業(yè)�。� 參考：《學(xué)習(xí)與探索》2017年08期

【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)政策是否有用是一個偽問題,真問題是何時有用�，F(xiàn)有研究認(rèn)為,產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的有效邊界取決于激勵機制和發(fā)展階段,而筆者認(rèn)為中國產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的有效邊界與企業(yè)的所有制有關(guān)。根據(jù)國企和民企面臨的約束條件和目標(biāo)函數(shù)差異,可以推導(dǎo)出以國企和民企為微觀基礎(chǔ)的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策在手段、目標(biāo)和效果上有顯著差異:以國企為基礎(chǔ)的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策,短期內(nèi)容易實現(xiàn)政府的集中目標(biāo),但是易導(dǎo)致產(chǎn)能過剩、低效率以及扭曲的政企關(guān)系;以民企為基礎(chǔ)的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策見效較慢,長期來看會促進市場競爭并形成規(guī)范的政企合作。中國產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的發(fā)展方向,應(yīng)該是逐步減少對國企的依賴,逐步加強地方政府與民企之間的合作。
[Abstract]:Whether industrial policy is useful is a false question, and the real question is when. The current research holds that the effective boundary of industrial policy depends on the incentive mechanism and the stage of development, while the author thinks that the effective boundary of industrial policy in China is related to the ownership of enterprises. According to the difference of constraint conditions and objective functions faced by state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, we can deduce that industrial policies based on state-owned enterprises and private enterprises have significant differences in means, objectives and effects: industrial policies based on state-owned enterprises. It is easy to achieve the government's goals in the short term, but it is easy to lead to overcapacity, inefficiency and distorted relationship between government and enterprise. Industrial policies based on private enterprises have slow effect, which will promote market competition and form normative cooperation between government and enterprises in the long run. The development direction of China's industrial policy should be to gradually reduce the dependence on state-owned enterprises and strengthen the cooperation between local governments and private enterprises.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)經(jīng)濟學(xué)院;中國人民大學(xué)企業(yè)與組織研究中心;
【分類號】：F121.3
，

本文編號：2016902