本文選題：全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡 + 瀾湄合作��； 參考：《外交學院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟全球化的不斷推進,國際分工格局從產(chǎn)業(yè)間分工為主日益轉(zhuǎn)向產(chǎn)品內(nèi)分工。而東亞作為全球經(jīng)濟增長最迅速的區(qū)域之一,不同規(guī)模和層次的區(qū)域合作日益推進。中國更是在全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中積極開展對柬埔寨、老撾、緬甸、泰國、越南(以下簡稱“湄公河五國”)的直接投資。本文從全球化背景下的國際分工現(xiàn)狀和東亞地區(qū)生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡呈現(xiàn)出的新特點出發(fā),研究了中國和湄公河五國在全球的貿(mào)易地位和產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展狀況,分析了他們各自在全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中所處的地位。進一步對中國對湄公河五國的投資規(guī)模、產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇和影響因素進行理論和實證分析,探討了中國對湄公河五國直接投資中存在的問題,并在此基礎上提出了相關的政策建議。本文得出的結(jié)論如下:第一,中國在全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中扮演“世界工廠”的角色,中國對外貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)以制成品的進出口為主,并且中國的制成品在世界貿(mào)易中具有較強的國際競爭力,具體而言,中國對外貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品的競爭力主要集中在服裝、紡織品等中低技術含量的制成品。第二,總體上看,湄公河五國的對外貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)以制成品的進出口為主,但各國有所差異。湄公河國家仍處于初級產(chǎn)品——制成品的南北分工體系中,在當前以制成品價值鏈分工為主的全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中處于邊緣化的地位,其參與國際分工的形式仍以傳統(tǒng)的產(chǎn)業(yè)間分工為主。第三,隨著中國制造業(yè)中的勞動密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)由比較優(yōu)勢向比較劣勢轉(zhuǎn)化,中國向勞動力成本更低的湄公河國家轉(zhuǎn)移勞動密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)成為經(jīng)濟進一步發(fā)展的需要。并且,中國制造業(yè)現(xiàn)有的低技術和高技術行業(yè)所形成的多層次生產(chǎn)技術,符合湄公河國家經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的多層次需求。第四,中國對湄公河五國的直接投資存在產(chǎn)業(yè)分布過于集中,易受到東道國法律法規(guī)欠缺、政治文化沖突的不利影響,以及缺乏對環(huán)境的保護意識等問題。第五,中國到湄公河國家進行直接投資在產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇上應注意與各國需求相符。中國企業(yè)在“走出去”的時候,要補充更多“走出去”相關的知識,學習并遵守湄公河各國的法律法規(guī),避免同質(zhì)競爭、惡性競爭。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization, the pattern of international division of labor is changing from inter-industry division of labor to intra-product division of labor. As one of the fastest growing regions in the world, the regional cooperation of different scales and levels is advancing day by day in East Asia. China is also actively engaged in direct investment in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam in global production networks. Based on the present situation of international division of labor in the context of globalization and the new characteristics of the production network in East Asia, this paper studies the trade status and industrial development of China and the Mekong five countries in the world. Their respective positions in the global production network are analyzed. Furthermore, the paper makes a theoretical and empirical analysis of the scale of Chinese investment in the Mekong five countries, industrial selection and influencing factors, probes into the problems existing in China's direct investment in the Mekong five countries, and puts forward relevant policy recommendations on this basis. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, China plays the role of "world factory" in the global production network, and China's foreign trade structure is dominated by the import and export of manufactured goods. Moreover, China's manufactured goods have strong international competitiveness in world trade. In particular, the competitiveness of China's foreign trade products is mainly concentrated in low and medium technology manufactured goods such as clothing and textiles. Secondly, in general, the foreign trade structure of the Mekong five countries is mainly the import and export of manufactured goods, but there are some differences among different countries. The Mekong countries are still in the North-South division of primary product-manufactured goods and are marginalized in the current global production network, which is dominated by the division of manufactured goods value chains. Its participation in the international division of labor is still based on the traditional division of labor between industries. Third, with the transition of labor-intensive industries from comparative advantage to comparative disadvantage in Chinese manufacturing industry, the transfer of labor-intensive industries to Mekong countries with lower labor costs has become the need of further economic development. Moreover, the existing low-technology and high-tech industries in china's manufacturing industry have formed multi-level production technologies that meet the multi-level needs of the Mekong countries' economic development. Fourth, China's direct investment in the Mekong five countries has some problems, such as the concentration of industries, the lack of laws and regulations of the host country, the negative impact of political and cultural conflicts, and the lack of awareness of environmental protection. Fifth, China's direct investment in Mekong countries should be in line with the needs of various countries in industrial choice. When "going out", Chinese enterprises should add more knowledge about "going out", study and abide by the laws and regulations of the Mekong countries, and avoid homogenous and vicious competition.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F125

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周雪春;;中國對泰國直接投資行業(yè)分布研究[J];東南亞縱橫;2016年05期

2 吳崇伯;;“一帶一路”框架下中國與東盟產(chǎn)能合作研究[J];南洋問題研究;2016年03期

3 鄧洲;;泰國產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力現(xiàn)狀及中泰產(chǎn)業(yè)合作展望[J];東南亞南亞研究;2016年03期

4 全毅;;中國—東盟瀾湄合作機制建設背景及重要意義[J];國際貿(mào)易;2016年08期

5 宋濤;;中國對緬甸直接投資的發(fā)展特征及趨勢研究[J];世界地理研究;2016年04期

6 盧進勇;楊杰;郭凌威;;中國在全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中的角色變遷研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2016年07期

7 張鵬;王娟;;全球生產(chǎn)網(wǎng)絡中國產(chǎn)業(yè)升級結(jié)構(gòu)封鎖效應及突破[J];科學學研究;2016年04期

8 王紅茹;;專家:產(chǎn)能合作是瀾湄合作亮點[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2016年12期

9 李文宏;孫磊;;中國企業(yè)在柬埔寨投資存在的問題及投資對策分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2016年01期

10 薛紫臣;謝聞歌;;緬甸國際直接投資環(huán)境分析[J];現(xiàn)代國際關系;2015年06期

，

本文編號：2015033