本文選題：耕地多功能 + 社會經(jīng)濟(jì)�。� 參考：《中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于我國工業(yè)化、城市化進(jìn)程不斷加速，人口持續(xù)增長、生態(tài)環(huán)境質(zhì)量日益下降等原因，導(dǎo)致我國耕地資源的數(shù)量減少和質(zhì)量降低。尤其在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)，伴隨經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的快速推進(jìn)，土地利用需求的多元化、層次性逐漸顯化，人地矛盾更加突出，促使人們突破對耕地傳統(tǒng)功能認(rèn)識的局限性，對耕地重新審視，賦予其新的地位和作用。因此，開展耕地功能的分析與社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系研究，通過耕地資源的多功能利用來兼顧城市土地開發(fā)與自然資源保存，以實(shí)現(xiàn)城市的可持續(xù)發(fā)展，就顯得尤為重要。 文章基于耕地多功能既有研究，分析耕地多功能內(nèi)涵及功能發(fā)揮影響因素，在此基礎(chǔ)上建立了耕地功能系統(tǒng)評價指標(biāo)體系；采用動態(tài)耦合模型法、綜合指數(shù)法和相關(guān)分析法定量研究耕地多功能與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展耦合機(jī)理和耕地功能的空間分異特征，提出促進(jìn)耕地多功能發(fā)揮和利用的建議和措施。以北京市為例，對1998-2012年北京市耕地功能與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展水平時間耦合態(tài)勢進(jìn)行分析，結(jié)果表明，研究期內(nèi)，北京市耕地功能與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展系統(tǒng)經(jīng)歷了低級共生和良性協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展階段；社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平越高，耕地多功能性越明顯。通過北京市各區(qū)縣2004、2006和2009年耕地功能評價，得到各區(qū)縣耕地的生產(chǎn)、生態(tài)服務(wù)、社會保障功能變化不一，其中以耕地資源條件較好的大興、順義、通州、延慶、房山、平谷六個區(qū)域耕地多功能的值最大，且生態(tài)服務(wù)和社會保障功能發(fā)展?jié)摿^大。通過相關(guān)分析則發(fā)現(xiàn)，耕地生產(chǎn)功能與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展水平有較顯著的相關(guān)性；生態(tài)服務(wù)功能與農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平呈正相關(guān)，與城市居民收入和人口密度呈負(fù)相關(guān)；社會保障功能與農(nóng)林牧漁業(yè)總產(chǎn)值、農(nóng)村投資存在相關(guān)性，與人口密度、居民生活水平并不相關(guān)；基于此，在區(qū)域社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的同時，應(yīng)該增加農(nóng)村地區(qū)和耕地的投入產(chǎn)出，加強(qiáng)生態(tài)保護(hù)，減小化肥施用量，有計劃的促進(jìn)耕地多功能利用，優(yōu)化耕地利用布局，并使地區(qū)人口保持在一個合理范圍內(nèi)，減小對耕地的壓力。 定性和定量化研究耕地的生產(chǎn)功能、生態(tài)服務(wù)功能、社會功能及其與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展水平的關(guān)系,不僅可以為耕地保護(hù)和優(yōu)化耕地利用布局提供理論依據(jù),而且可以為確定相關(guān)政策優(yōu)先干預(yù)區(qū)域及相應(yīng)投資機(jī)會的選擇，，為規(guī)劃和確定目前及未來一段時期內(nèi)最適合的政策干預(yù)策略以及促進(jìn)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展提供實(shí)踐參考。
[Abstract]:As a result of our country industrialization, the urbanization process unceasingly accelerates, the population continues to increase, the ecological environment quality drops day by day and so on, causes our country cultivated land resources quantity reduction and the quality to reduce. Especially in the economically developed areas, with the rapid development of the economy, the diversification of land use demand, the gradual manifestation of hierarchy, and the more prominent contradiction between man and land, people break through the limitations of traditional functions of cultivated land. To reexamine cultivated land, endow it with new status and function. Therefore, the research on the relationship between the function of cultivated land and the development of social economy should be carried out to realize the sustainable development of the city by taking into account the development of urban land and the preservation of natural resources through the multifunctional utilization of cultivated land resources. Based on the existing research of cultivated land multi-function, this paper analyzes the connotation of cultivated land multi-function and the influencing factors of function, and then establishes the evaluation index system of cultivated land function system, adopts the dynamic coupling model method, and establishes the evaluation index system of cultivated land function system. The coupling mechanism of multi-function of cultivated land with economic and social development and the spatial differentiation characteristics of cultivated land function were studied quantitatively by comprehensive index method and correlation analysis method. Suggestions and measures were put forward to promote the development and utilization of multi-function cultivated land. Taking Beijing as an example, this paper analyzes the temporal coupling situation between the function of cultivated land and the level of economic and social development in Beijing from 1998 to 2012. The results show that, during the period of study, The function of cultivated land and the system of economic and social development in Beijing have gone through the stage of low level symbiosis and benign harmonious development, and the higher the level of social and economic development, the more obvious the multifunction of cultivated land. Based on the functional evaluation of cultivated land in 2004 / 04 and 2009 in Beijing, it is found that the production, ecological services and social security functions of cultivated land vary from district to county. Among them, Daxing, Shunyi, Tongzhou, Yanqing and Fangshan have better cultivated land resources. The multifunction of cultivated land in Pinggu six regions is the largest, and the development potential of ecological service and social security function is great. Through correlation analysis, it was found that cultivated land production function was significantly correlated with the level of economic and social development, ecological service function was positively correlated with the level of rural economic development, and it was negatively correlated with urban residents' income and population density. The function of social security is related to the total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, rural investment, but not to the population density and the living standard of the residents. Therefore, the input and output of rural areas and cultivated land should be increased while the regional social and economic development. Strengthening ecological protection, reducing the amount of chemical fertilizer, promoting the multifunctional utilization of cultivated land, optimizing the distribution of cultivated land, and keeping the population of the region within a reasonable range, The qualitative and quantitative study on the production function, ecological service function, social function and its relationship with the level of economic and social development of cultivated land can not only provide a theoretical basis for the protection of cultivated land and the optimization of the distribution of cultivated land utilization, but also reduce the pressure on cultivated land. Moreover, it can provide practical reference for the selection of priority intervention regions and corresponding investment opportunities, for planning and determining the most suitable policy intervention strategies for the present and for a period of time to come, and for promoting the development of rural economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F323.211;F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王舒曼,譚榮,吳麗梅;農(nóng)地資源舒適性價值評估——以江蘇省為例[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2005年06期

2 宋敏;張安錄;;湖北省農(nóng)地資源正外部性價值量估算——基于對農(nóng)地社會與生態(tài)之功能和價值分類的分析[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2009年04期

3 宋小青;歐陽竹;;耕地多功能內(nèi)涵及其對耕地保護(hù)的啟示[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年07期

4 蔡運(yùn)龍;中國農(nóng)村轉(zhuǎn)型與耕地保護(hù)機(jī)制[J];地理科學(xué);2001年01期

5 蔡運(yùn)龍;霍雅勤;;中國耕地價值重建方法與案例研究[J];地理學(xué)報;2006年10期

6 李翠珍;孔祥斌;孫憲海;;北京市耕地資源價值體系及價值估算方法[J];地理學(xué)報;2008年03期

7 李廣東;邱道持;王平;;三峽生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)耕地非市場價值評估[J];地理學(xué)報;2011年04期

8 劉衛(wèi)東;;耕地多功能保護(hù)問題研究[J];國土資源科技管理;2008年01期

9 袁弘;蔣芳;劉盛和;蔡建明;;城市化進(jìn)程中北京市多功能農(nóng)地利用[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2007年10期

10 曹志宏;郝晉珉;梁流濤;;黃淮海地區(qū)耕地資源價值核算[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2009年09期

本文編號：2002488