本文選題：跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟 + 制度距離�。� 參考：《商業(yè)經(jīng)濟與管理》2017年05期

【摘要】：文章從制度理論指出在中國企業(yè)跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟中,不同控制方式與聯(lián)盟績效的關(guān)系存在差異,并基于我國境內(nèi)跨區(qū)域企業(yè)聯(lián)盟進行的實證分析,證實了在跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟中,關(guān)系控制比合同控制對聯(lián)盟績效產(chǎn)生的積極作用更強。進一步檢驗了企業(yè)聯(lián)盟伙伴所在區(qū)域間的制度距離對聯(lián)盟控制方式與聯(lián)盟績效之間的調(diào)節(jié)作用,發(fā)現(xiàn)關(guān)系控制對聯(lián)盟績效的影響沒有受到制度距離的調(diào)節(jié)作用,制度距離僅對合同控制與聯(lián)盟績效的關(guān)系產(chǎn)生負向的調(diào)節(jié)作用,即合同對聯(lián)盟績效的積極作用會因為制度距離的增加而削弱。
[Abstract]:This paper points out that there are differences in the relationship between different control methods and alliance performance in the cross-regional alliance of Chinese enterprises from the system theory. Based on the empirical analysis of cross-regional enterprise alliance in China, it is confirmed that there is a cross-regional alliance in China. Relationship control has more positive effect on alliance performance than contract control. Furthermore, the paper examines the regulatory effect of the institutional distance between the regions where the enterprise alliance partners are located on the alliance control mode and the alliance performance. It is found that the influence of the relationship control on the alliance performance is not affected by the regulatory effect of the institutional distance. Institutional distance only has a negative regulatory effect on the relationship between contract control and alliance performance, that is, the positive effect of contract on alliance performance will be weakened by the increase of institutional distance.
【作者單位】： 華南師范大學經(jīng)濟與管理學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金項目“戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟中的企業(yè)IT能力、聯(lián)盟能力與聯(lián)盟績效的關(guān)系研究”(13BGL053) 廣東省自然科學基金項目“市場分割條件下中國企業(yè)國內(nèi)跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟的控制方式與績效研究”(2014A030313442) 廣東省哲學社會科學規(guī)劃項目“國內(nèi)跨區(qū)域聯(lián)盟的合法性、制度距離對聯(lián)盟控制方式的影響研究”(GD14CGL06)
【分類號】：F125;F279.2
，

本文編號：1901271