本文選題：廣東省 + 多層次��； 參考：《廣東外語外貿大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在傳統的區(qū)域發(fā)展理論框架下,區(qū)域經濟增長依賴于區(qū)域內部的要素積累能力和稟賦條件。因此,區(qū)域政策的核心是吸引和培育要素,改善投資環(huán)境、設立吸引高級要素的優(yōu)惠政策成為區(qū)域政府常用的政策手段。進入1980年代后,隨著經濟全球化的發(fā)展,全球價值鏈分工體系逐漸取代了原有的國家(區(qū)域)間產業(yè)間分工模式,全球生產網絡使得區(qū)域間的聯系更加緊密。在此背景下,現代區(qū)域發(fā)展理論認為,區(qū)域是根植于區(qū)域間的關系網絡中的,區(qū)域是相互依賴的,區(qū)域經濟增長還取決于區(qū)域與外部的網絡關系的密度、與“誰”建立了“何種”區(qū)域網絡關系。區(qū)域的發(fā)展既依賴于自身要素的稟賦也取決于其與更大更廣闊區(qū)域間建立的多層次的區(qū)域合作關系網絡。因此,多層次的區(qū)域經濟合作成為當前轉型時期推動地區(qū)發(fā)展的主要策略。本文以廣東省為例,通過事實梳理和實證檢驗廣東省在多層次區(qū)域經濟合作進程中的所作努力,分析廣東省是如何通過積極主動地實施區(qū)域經濟一體化戰(zhàn)略,構建區(qū)域經濟合作網絡進而推動區(qū)域經濟發(fā)展。本文歸納總結了廣東實施區(qū)域經濟一體化戰(zhàn)略的特點,利用貿易依存度檢驗、貿易密集度檢驗、產業(yè)集中度檢驗等評價分析上述區(qū)域經濟合作戰(zhàn)略在多大程度上推動了廣東經濟的發(fā)展。本文使用SU(2013)的分析框架,將廣東的區(qū)域經濟一體化戰(zhàn)略劃分為三個層次:國際、省際和省內的一體化,發(fā)現作為我國改革開放前沿的廣東省一直通過開展多層次區(qū)域經濟合作構建國際間、省級間的外部網絡關系,同時在區(qū)域內部通過實施省內的一體化戰(zhàn)略強化省內各城市間的網絡聯系強度,推動區(qū)域經濟發(fā)展。研究發(fā)現:國際層面,廣東省與東盟五國、韓國和港澳地區(qū)貿易往來密切,屬于關系緊密的貿易伙伴但近年來廣東與東盟貿易在整個中國東盟貿易中的相對低位下降,這引起了本文的重視并進一步測算廣東與東盟五國的貿易潛力。結果顯示廣東與馬來西亞、印度尼西亞的貿易潛力正在衰退,而新加坡和菲律賓屬于貿易潛力發(fā)掘型國家,仍有較大貿易空間。省際層面,廣東對泛珠三角其余8省(區(qū))的專業(yè)化指數先升后降,符合倒U型曲線理論,泛珠三角的區(qū)域經濟一體化不斷加深但由于廣東與毗鄰省份產業(yè)同構性較強,相互存在競爭關系,區(qū)域間經濟合作浮于表面不夠深入。省內層面,珠三角9市的專業(yè)化指數同樣滿足倒U型曲線,地區(qū)一體化程度較高,但三大經濟圈產業(yè)發(fā)展速度層次不齊,各地市之間協調機制不健全,經濟利益上很難達成一致共識,因而地市間政府合作難以深入開展。為推動以上問題能得到有效解決,本文提出廣東省在國際層面、省際層面和省內層面的多層次治理建議。國際層面,一是要發(fā)揮廣東省政府的主觀能動性并形成“決策-反饋”機制,促進中央政府完善對區(qū)域的整體規(guī)劃;二是廣東省要與貿易伙伴國的地方政府盡快建立和完善地方合作機制,推動形成多領域、多層次的合作交流體系;三是廣東省政府應完善政策引導體系,推進優(yōu)勢產業(yè)投資合作。省際層面,一是要推動完善利益協調機制,實現多贏局面;二是要引導產業(yè)有序轉移承接,從而推進產業(yè)鏈上下游的深度合作。省內層面,廣東省除了要建立有效的協調機制,還應明確各市的主體功能定位,達到增強區(qū)域整體競爭力的目的;另外,要制定有效的區(qū)域規(guī)劃績效評估體系,建立區(qū)域合作的實施保障機制。
[Abstract]:Under the framework of the traditional regional development theory, regional economic growth depends on the factor accumulation and endowment conditions within the region. Therefore, the core of the regional policy is to attract and cultivate the factors, improve the investment environment and establish preferential policies to attract the advanced elements to become the common policy means of regional government. After 1980s, the economy is with the economy. With the development of globalization, the global value chain division system has gradually replaced the original industrial division mode between countries (regions), and the global production network makes the interregional connections more closely. In this context, the modern regional development theory holds that the region is rooted in the interregional relations network, the region is interdependent, and the regional economy is interdependent. The growth also depends on the density of the network relations between the region and the outside, and the "who" has established "what" regional network relations. The development of the region depends on the endowment of its own elements as well as the multi-level network of regional cooperation relations with the larger and wider regions. Therefore, the multi-level regional economic cooperation has become the current transfer. The main strategy to promote regional development in the period of type. Taking Guangdong Province as an example, this paper examines and empirically tests Guangdong's efforts in the process of multi-layer regional economic cooperation, and analyzes how Guangdong province builds regional economic cooperation network to promote regional economy through active and active implementation of regional economic integration strategy. In this paper, the characteristics of Guangdong's implementation of regional economic integration strategy are summarized, and the evaluation of trade dependence degree, trade density test, industrial concentration test and so on to analyze the economic cooperation strategy of the above regional economic cooperation has promoted the economic development of Guangdong. This paper uses the analysis framework of SU (2013) to carry out the regional economy of Guangdong. The integration strategy of economic integration is divided into three levels: International, inter provincial and provincial integration. It is found that Guangdong Province, which is the frontier of China's reform and opening to the outside world, has been constructing international, inter provincial external network relations through multi-level regional economic cooperation, and strengthening the inter provincial cities through the integration strategy within the region. In the international level, Guangdong and the five ASEAN countries, South Korea and Hong Kong and Macao are close to the international level, and they are closely related trade partners, but in recent years, Guangdong and ASEAN trade in the whole China ASEAN trade have fallen relatively low, which has aroused the attention and further calculation of this article. The trade potential of Guangdong and the five ASEAN countries shows that the trade potential of Guangdong and Malaysia, Indonesia is declining, while Singapore and Philippines are trade potential countries and still have greater trade space. On the inter provincial level, Guangdong's specialization index of the remaining 8 provinces (regions) in the Pan Pearl River Delta is up and down, which is in line with the inverted U curve theory. On the other hand, the regional economic integration of the Pan Pearl River Delta is deepening, but because of the strong isomorphism between Guangdong and its adjacent provinces, there is a competitive relationship with each other, and the economic cooperation between regions is not deep enough. In the provincial level, the professional index of the 9 cities of the Pearl River Delta also meets the inverted U curve, and the degree of regional integration is high, but the three big economic circles are industry. With the uneven development speed level, the coordination mechanism between cities and cities is not sound, and it is difficult to reach consensus in economic interests. Therefore, the cooperation between cities is difficult to carry out in depth. In order to promote the above problems, it can be effectively solved. This paper puts forward the multi-level governance proposals at the international level, the inter provincial level and the provincial level in Guangdong province. We should give full play to the subjective initiative of the Guangdong provincial government and form the "decision feedback" mechanism to promote the central government to improve the overall planning of the region. Two, the local government of Guangdong province should establish and improve the local cooperation mechanism as soon as possible, and promote the formation of multi-disciplinary and multi-layer cooperation and exchange system, and the three is the Guangdong provincial government. Good policy guidance system, promote the advantage industry investment cooperation. Inter provincial level, one is to promote the improvement of the benefit coordination mechanism to achieve multi win situation; two is to guide the orderly transfer of industry to undertake, and promote the deep cooperation in the industrial chain downstream. In the provincial level, in addition to establish an effective coordination mechanism, Guangdong should also clear the main body of the city. The purpose of functional positioning is to enhance the overall competitiveness of the region. In addition, effective regional planning performance evaluation system should be formulated and the implementation guarantee mechanism of regional cooperation should be established.
【學位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F127

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊毅;;中國外交決策中的地方政府——以廣西推動“泛北部灣區(qū)域經濟合作”為例[J];理論月刊;2016年05期

2 樸光姬;;“一帶一路”與東亞“西擴”——從亞洲區(qū)域經濟增長機制構建的視角分析[J];當代亞太;2015年06期

3 孫久文;;區(qū)域經濟一體化:理論、意義與“十三五”時期發(fā)展思路[J];區(qū)域經濟評論;2015年06期

4 李丹;崔日明;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略與全球經貿格局重構[J];經濟學家;2015年08期

5 張曉靜;;亞太區(qū)域合作深度一體化與生產網絡的關聯性[J];亞太經濟;2015年01期

6 孫久文;姚鵬;;京津冀產業(yè)空間轉移、地區(qū)專業(yè)化與協同發(fā)展——基于新經濟地理學的分析框架[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2015年01期

7 全毅;;全球區(qū)域經濟一體化發(fā)展趨勢及中國的對策[J];經濟學家;2015年01期

8 劉志彪;;區(qū)域一體化發(fā)展的再思考——兼論促進長三角地區(qū)一體化發(fā)展的政策與手段[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2014年06期

9 李敬;陳澍;萬廣華;付陳梅;;中國區(qū)域經濟增長的空間關聯及其解釋——基于網絡分析方法[J];經濟研究;2014年11期

10 盛斌;果婷;;亞太區(qū)域經濟一體化博弈與中國的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];世界經濟與政治;2014年10期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 黃穎川;吳哲;南小渭;;廣東與東盟經貿合作規(guī)模全國最大[N];南方日報;2014年

相關博士學位論文 前9條

1 王建新;當代中國經濟圈政府合作研究[D];云南大學;2015年

2 谷松;建構與融合：區(qū)域一體化進程中的地方府際間利益協調研究[D];吉林大學;2014年

3 孫宇;中國區(qū)域經濟一體化戰(zhàn)略構建研究[D];首都經濟貿易大學;2013年

4 王勇;促進珠三角區(qū)域經濟一體化的財政政策研究[D];財政部財政科學研究所;2011年

5 張軍;“珠三角”區(qū)域經濟一體化發(fā)展研究[D];西南財經大學;2011年

6 陳光武;東亞區(qū)域經濟一體化研究[D];吉林大學;2009年

7 程艷;中國區(qū)域經濟整合：泛一體化視野的分析[D];浙江大學;2008年

8 王微微;區(qū)域經濟一體化的經濟增長效應及模式選擇研究[D];對外經濟貿易大學;2007年

9 李鐵立;邊界效應與跨邊界次區(qū)域經濟合作研究[D];東北師范大學;2004年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 王軍;廣東對東盟出口貿易的影響因素及潛力探究[D];廣東外語外貿大學;2016年

2 陳群;基于面板數據引力模型的廣東省貿易潛力分析[D];華南理工大學;2015年

，

本文編號：1898311