本文選題：集聚 + 城市集聚��； 參考：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)在空間上的變遷表現(xiàn)為集聚或分散,經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)在時(shí)間上的變化表現(xiàn)為增長(zhǎng)或衰退。集聚和增長(zhǎng)是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展在時(shí)空演化過(guò)程中最顯著的特征,二者緊密聯(lián)系,相互促進(jìn)、相互影響。然而,長(zhǎng)時(shí)間以來(lái),經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)界一直將集聚和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的研究相分離,沒(méi)有形成一個(gè)系統(tǒng)的理論,關(guān)于集聚的研究缺乏經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的背景而顯得單薄,關(guān)于增長(zhǎng)的研究缺乏集聚的貢獻(xiàn)而顯得缺憾。直到新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)的出現(xiàn),才打破了二者長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)的獨(dú)立分析的狀態(tài),集聚和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)開始納入同一分析框架和體系當(dāng)中。在此之后,眾多學(xué)者開始從理論和實(shí)證角度對(duì)集聚和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了廣泛而深入的研究,絕大部分研究成果表明:集聚與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間存在正相關(guān)的關(guān)系,即集聚能夠促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)。城市是人口和經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)集聚的某個(gè)空間范圍和載體,城市集聚是所有集聚類型中的最高形態(tài),因?yàn)槌鞘屑郯巳丝诩�、要素集聚、產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚等等。當(dāng)城市集聚產(chǎn)生之后,又是什么機(jī)制在推動(dòng)著城市經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展或者是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng)。通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和理論進(jìn)行梳理,厘清城市化、城市集聚、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間聯(lián)系,試圖從市場(chǎng)機(jī)制和非市場(chǎng)機(jī)制兩個(gè)層面來(lái)推導(dǎo)城市集聚促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的作用路徑。市場(chǎng)機(jī)制主要是指城市集聚通過(guò)范圍經(jīng)濟(jì)和規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)報(bào)酬遞增,非市場(chǎng)機(jī)制主要是指城市集聚通過(guò)知識(shí)溢出效應(yīng)和消費(fèi)偏好溢出效應(yīng)來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)報(bào)酬遞增,在二者的共同作用下,城市集聚促進(jìn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng)。長(zhǎng)江中游城市群是2015年國(guó)務(wù)院批復(fù)的跨區(qū)域國(guó)家級(jí)城市群,作為中部崛起戰(zhàn)略的重要支撐,國(guó)家明確對(duì)其戰(zhàn)略定位為:中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)新增長(zhǎng)極。但是,通過(guò)對(duì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的描述發(fā)現(xiàn):與我國(guó)長(zhǎng)三角、珠三角、京津冀城市群相比,長(zhǎng)江中游城市群的城市集聚水平和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平整體較低。在實(shí)證研究中,以勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率和就業(yè)密度分別作為經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)和城市集聚的代理變量,利用城市群內(nèi)31個(gè)城市的10年面板數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行多元回歸,實(shí)證結(jié)果表明:長(zhǎng)江中游城市群城市集聚能夠促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),但整體集聚水平不高,對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的促進(jìn)作用不明顯。
[Abstract]:The change of economic activity in space is agglomeration or dispersion, and the change of economic activity in time is growth or decline.Agglomeration and growth are the most remarkable characteristics of economic development in the evolution of time and space. They are closely related, promote and influence each other.However, for a long time, the economic circles have separated the study of agglomeration from the study of economic growth, and have not formed a systematic theory. The research on agglomeration lacks the background of economic growth and appears to be thin.The research on growth lacks the contribution of agglomeration.It was not until the appearance of new economic geography that they broke the state of independent analysis for a long time. Agglomeration and economic growth began to be brought into the same analytical framework and system.After that, many scholars began to conduct extensive and in-depth research on the relationship between agglomeration and economic growth from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Most of the research results show that there is a positive correlation between agglomeration and economic growth.Namely agglomeration can promote economic growth.Urban agglomeration is the spatial range and carrier of population and economic agglomeration, and urban agglomeration is the highest form of all agglomeration types, because urban agglomeration includes population agglomeration, factor agglomeration, industrial agglomeration and so on.When urban agglomeration comes into being, what mechanism is promoting the development of urban economy or the growth of regional economy.Through combing the relevant literature and theory to clarify the relationship among urbanization, urban agglomeration and economic growth, this paper tries to deduce the role of urban agglomeration in promoting economic growth from the two aspects of market mechanism and non-market mechanism.Market mechanism mainly refers to urban agglomeration through scope economy and economies of scale to achieve increasing returns, non-market mechanism mainly refers to urban agglomeration through knowledge spillover effect and consumption preference spillover effect to achieve increasing returns.Under the joint action of both, urban agglomeration promotes the growth of economy.Urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is a cross-regional state-level urban agglomeration approved by the State Council in 2015. As an important support of the strategy of rising up of the middle part of the Yangtze River, the state has clearly defined its strategic position as: the new economic growth pole of China.However, it is found that compared with the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, the urban agglomeration level and the economic development level in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River are lower.In the empirical study, the labor productivity and employment density are taken as the proxy variables of economic growth and urban agglomeration, respectively, using the 10-year panel data of 31 cities in the urban agglomeration to carry out multivariate regression.The empirical results show that urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River can promote economic growth, but the overall agglomeration level is not high, and the promoting effect on economic growth is not obvious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F127;F299.27

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇紅鍵;魏后凱;鄧明;;城市集聚經(jīng)濟(jì)的多維性及其實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年05期

2 張?jiān)骑w;;城市群內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2014年01期

3 陳利鋒;范紅忠;李伊涵;;生產(chǎn)與人口的集中促進(jìn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)嗎?——來(lái)自日本的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn)[J];人口與經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年06期

4 洪娟;谷永芬;;城市群內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展——基于長(zhǎng)三角25市動(dòng)態(tài)面板數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年03期

5 張宗慶;張寅;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚、知識(shí)溢出與區(qū)域增長(zhǎng)——基于長(zhǎng)三角區(qū)域的實(shí)證研究[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

6 潘文卿;劉慶;;中國(guó)制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——基于中國(guó)工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

7 李偉軍;孫彥驪;;城市群內(nèi)金融集聚及其空間演進(jìn):以長(zhǎng)三角為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2011年06期

8 黃永興;徐鵬;孫彥驪;;金融集聚影響因素及其溢出效應(yīng)——基于長(zhǎng)三角的實(shí)證分析[J];投資研究;2011年08期

9 雷鵬;;制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證研究[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年01期

10 陳立泰;張祖妞;;服務(wù)業(yè)集聚與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證研究[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 陶永亮;經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化進(jìn)程中的空間集聚與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

2 潘輝;城市集聚、外部性與地區(qū)工資差距研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

3 李金滟;城市集聚：理論與證據(jù)[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 楊友維;集聚對(duì)云南省經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響研究[D];云南大學(xué);2016年

2 段大玲;基于城市群視角的城市集聚效應(yīng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系研究[D];蘭州商學(xué)院;2013年

3 汲曉艷;環(huán)渤海地區(qū)FDI集聚研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1771637