本文選題：法律化　切入點(diǎn)：國際制度競爭　出處：《東南亞研究》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：作為推動(dòng)亞太經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的重要力量,中國和美國都著力在亞太地區(qū)打造自貿(mào)區(qū)網(wǎng)絡(luò),試圖整合亞太經(jīng)貿(mào)規(guī)則。由于兩國自貿(mào)區(qū)策略在義務(wù)性、精確性和授權(quán)性等法律化水平上存在顯著差別,客觀上形成了亞太經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的兩種路徑,其背后是美國和中國圍繞貿(mào)易規(guī)則的國際制度競爭。對(duì)不同路徑的選擇與中國和美國在國際貿(mào)易制度中的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)密切相關(guān)。作為在位者,美國傾向于通過較高法律化水平的方式鞏固自身的規(guī)則收益和治理話語權(quán)。作為進(jìn)入者,中國則主要通過較低的法律化水平降低締約過程的交易成本來獲得伙伴收益。
[Abstract]:As an important force in promoting economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region, both China and the United States are making efforts to build a free trade zone network in the Asia-Pacific region to try to integrate the Asia-Pacific economic and trade rules. There are significant differences in the level of legalization, such as accuracy and authoritarianism, which objectively form two paths of Asia-Pacific economic integration. The choice of different paths is closely related to the comparative advantage of China and China in the international trade system. The United States tends to consolidate its rules and governance rights through a higher level of legalization, while China, as an entrant, obtains the benefits of its partners mainly by lowering the transaction costs of the contracting process at a lower level of legalization.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)國際關(guān)系學(xué)院;中國—東盟區(qū)域發(fā)展協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【基金】：中國—東盟區(qū)域發(fā)展協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心科研專項(xiàng)和教育部長江學(xué)者和創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)發(fā)展計(jì)劃聯(lián)合資助(CW201516)
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;F114.46
，

本文編號(hào)：1617440