本文選題：“一帶一路”　切入點(diǎn)：對外直接投資　出處：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：投資合作是“一帶一路”建設(shè)發(fā)展的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容和關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域,如何擴(kuò)大與“一帶一路”國家的投資合作,探索新的合作方式與新領(lǐng)域,對中國進(jìn)一步深入“走出去”戰(zhàn)略十分關(guān)鍵。因此本文從中國對“一帶一路”國家的投資問題作為主要研究內(nèi)容,從中國對“一帶一路”國家的投資業(yè)績與投資潛力作為出發(fā)點(diǎn),研究當(dāng)前中國對主要“一帶一路”國家的投資現(xiàn)狀以及投資業(yè)績與投資潛力水平,以期為中國政府企業(yè)赴“一帶一路”國家進(jìn)行投資提供決策參考和依據(jù)。本文主要按照以下的研究框架進(jìn)行展開,第一章,主要介紹本研究的背景與目的意義,對當(dāng)前國內(nèi)外相關(guān)學(xué)者已有的研究進(jìn)行回顧與評價(jià);第二章,介紹當(dāng)前關(guān)于投資研究的相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ),對傳統(tǒng)投資理論、發(fā)展中國家投資理論做系統(tǒng)的梳理與總結(jié);第三章,對中國“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略進(jìn)行簡要的介紹,并在此背景下,分析近年來中國對“一帶一路”國家的發(fā)展歷程、特征等;第四章,將聯(lián)合國貿(mào)發(fā)會(huì)(UNCTAD)提出的對外直接投資業(yè)績指數(shù)與潛力指數(shù)進(jìn)行修正,構(gòu)建中國對“一帶一路”國家對外直接投資業(yè)績與潛力指數(shù)并進(jìn)行測算比較;第五章得出研究結(jié)論并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出相應(yīng)的對策建議。在研究方法的選取上,本文主要運(yùn)用對比分析的方法,考慮到“一帶一路”作為兩個(gè)發(fā)展方向不同的地域特征,本文將兩個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶的問題分別進(jìn)行考慮研究,就中國對兩者的投資問題分別進(jìn)行測算研究,并作出兩者的對比,以期發(fā)現(xiàn)中國對兩個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶投資問題的異同點(diǎn),以便提出更有針對性的對策建議。分析中國對“一帶”、“一路”國家的投資現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)中國對“一帶”、“一路”兩個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶的投資現(xiàn)狀特征基本相同,總量較少且地區(qū)間差異較大;分析業(yè)績指數(shù),發(fā)現(xiàn)中國對兩個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶的投資業(yè)績指數(shù)10年間波動(dòng)不大,都只有少數(shù)國家的業(yè)績水平超過該經(jīng)濟(jì)帶業(yè)績的平均水平,其余國家的業(yè)績水平均有緩慢上升;從潛力指數(shù)來看,中國對“一帶”、“一路”國家的投資潛力較為穩(wěn)定,投資潛力在短時(shí)間內(nèi)沒有發(fā)生較大變化,部分經(jīng)濟(jì)較為發(fā)達(dá)的國家綜合投資潛力優(yōu)勢明顯,大多數(shù)國家僅在某領(lǐng)域內(nèi)具有較高的潛力;交叉分析投資業(yè)績與潛力,所選國家中屬于的“領(lǐng)先國家”的數(shù)量較少,大部分國家屬于“超潛力發(fā)揮國家”與“未發(fā)揮潛力國家”,投資業(yè)績與投資潛力不相匹配�？傮w而言,通過對“一帶”、“一路”的對比研究,由于兩經(jīng)濟(jì)帶大都由發(fā)展中國家組成,國家經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)環(huán)境具有一定的相似性,因此,中國對兩經(jīng)濟(jì)帶的投資現(xiàn)狀、投資業(yè)績與投資潛力均有很大的相似性。
[Abstract]:Investment cooperation is the key content and key area of Belt and Road's construction and development. It is very important for China to go further into the "going out" strategy. Therefore, this paper focuses on China's investment in "Belt and Road" countries as its main research content. From the perspective of China's investment performance and investment potential in "Belt and Road" countries, this paper studies the current investment situation and investment performance and investment potential level of China in the major "Belt and Road" countries. In order to provide a reference and basis for Chinese government enterprises to invest in "Belt and Road" country, this paper is mainly carried out according to the following research framework. The first chapter mainly introduces the background and purpose significance of this study. Review and evaluation of the current domestic and foreign scholars; chapter two, introduce the current investment research on the relevant theoretical basis, traditional investment theory, developing countries investment theory to do a systematic review and summary; chapter three, This paper gives a brief introduction to China's "Belt and Road" strategy and, against this background, analyzes China's development history and characteristics of the country in recent years. Chapter 4th, The performance index and potential index of FDI proposed by UNCTAD are revised, and the index of performance and potential of China's foreign direct investment (FDI) of "Belt and Road" is constructed and compared. Chapter 5th draws the conclusion of the research and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions on this basis. In the selection of research methods, this paper mainly uses the method of comparative analysis, taking into account "Belt and Road" as two regional characteristics with different development directions. In this paper, the problems of the two economic zones are considered and studied separately, and the problems of Chinese investment in the two economic zones are measured and studied separately, and the comparison between the two is made in order to find the similarities and differences between China and the investment problems of the two economic zones. In order to put forward more targeted countermeasures and suggestions, this paper analyzes the present situation of China's investment in the "Belt" and "one Road" countries, and finds out that the present investment status of the "Belt" and "one Road" economic zones in China is basically the same, the total amount of which is relatively small and the difference between regions is great; By analyzing the performance index, it is found that China's investment performance index for the two economic zones has not fluctuated in the past 10 years. Only a few countries' performance level is higher than the average performance level of the economic belt, while the performance level of the other countries has increased slowly. Judging from the potential index, China's investment potential in the "belt" and "one road" countries is relatively stable, and the investment potential has not changed much in a short period of time, and some countries with relatively developed economies have obvious advantages in comprehensive investment potential. Most countries have higher potential in only one area; a cross-analysis of investment performance and potential, and fewer "leading countries" in the selected countries, Most countries are "super-potential countries" and "non-potential countries", and investment performance does not match investment potential. Overall, through comparative studies of "Belt" and "Road", Because most of the two economic belts are composed of developing countries and the national economic and social environment is similar to each other, China's investment status, investment performance and investment potential of the two economic zones are very similar.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周五七;;“一帶一路”沿線直接投資分布與挑戰(zhàn)應(yīng)對[J];改革;2015年08期

2 劉衛(wèi)東;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵與科學(xué)問題[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年05期

3 鄭蕾;劉志高;;中國對“一帶一路”沿線直接投資空間格局[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年05期

4 鄒嘉齡;劉春臘;尹國慶;唐志鵬;;中國與“一帶一路”沿線國家貿(mào)易格局及其經(jīng)濟(jì)貢獻(xiàn)[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年05期

5 鐘書琰;;“21世紀(jì)海上絲綢之路”背景下中國對東盟基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資研究[J];東南亞縱橫;2015年04期

6 譚秀杰;周茂榮;;21世紀(jì)“海上絲綢之路”貿(mào)易潛力及其影響因素——基于隨機(jī)前沿引力模型的實(shí)證研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年02期

7 申現(xiàn)杰;肖金成;;國際區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)合作新形勢與我國“一帶一路”合作戰(zhàn)略[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年11期

8 袁新濤;;“一帶一路”建設(shè)的國家戰(zhàn)略分析[J];理論月刊;2014年11期

9 李富有;王鍵;孫敏;;基于業(yè)績指數(shù)和潛力指數(shù)的西部地區(qū)民間投資績效研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與信息論壇;2013年05期

10 佘雪鋒;;中國15個(gè)副省級城市利用外資業(yè)績與潛力比較研究[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 梁瑩瑩;中國對外直接投資決定因素與戰(zhàn)略研究[D];南開大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙曉敏;中國對外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀與問題研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1615905