本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)保投資 環(huán)境效應(yīng) 經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng) 面板效應(yīng)模型　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,環(huán)境問題日益凸顯,我國(guó)對(duì)環(huán)境保護(hù)愈發(fā)重視。我國(guó)環(huán)保投資規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大,環(huán)境保護(hù)的投資總額占GDP的比重逐年增高。通過對(duì)環(huán)保投資現(xiàn)狀分析發(fā)現(xiàn),我國(guó)環(huán)保投資規(guī)模跟發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家相比仍然不足,環(huán)保投資結(jié)構(gòu)存在著不合理之處�！丁笆濉鄙鷳B(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)規(guī)劃》強(qiáng)調(diào)“十三五”期間,我國(guó)環(huán)境質(zhì)量將實(shí)現(xiàn)總體改善,并將環(huán)境治理作為我國(guó)各級(jí)政府的重要任務(wù),實(shí)現(xiàn)中央環(huán)保督查工作的全覆蓋。環(huán)境保護(hù)投資是為保護(hù)環(huán)境進(jìn)行的投資行為,環(huán)保投資的規(guī)模和結(jié)構(gòu)分配決定了環(huán)保投資的效應(yīng)大小,環(huán)保投資效果又直接影響到我國(guó)的環(huán)境質(zhì)量的改善,為測(cè)度我國(guó)環(huán)保投資的環(huán)境效應(yīng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng),論文選取2004-2014年全國(guó)30個(gè)省市(除西藏、港澳臺(tái)外)的面板數(shù)據(jù),將環(huán)保投資總額及其結(jié)構(gòu)分項(xiàng)分別作為自變量,運(yùn)用計(jì)量分析軟件EVIEWS 9.0,對(duì)我國(guó)30個(gè)省市環(huán)保投資的環(huán)境效應(yīng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)進(jìn)行綜合考慮,運(yùn)用面板效應(yīng)模型進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,得出30省市的環(huán)保投資對(duì)環(huán)境質(zhì)量與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響程度,比較各省市間的環(huán)保投資影響程度差異。研究結(jié)果表明,環(huán)保投資對(duì)環(huán)境治理及經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展均具有正效應(yīng)。環(huán)保投資能夠提升我國(guó)30個(gè)省市能源利用率、垃圾處理能力。這兩個(gè)指標(biāo)的平均影響程度分別為0.716、0.770。這說明環(huán)保投資對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境改善具有促進(jìn)作用。環(huán)保投資能夠拉動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)總量的提升、就業(yè)總量的增長(zhǎng)。環(huán)保投資總額對(duì)我國(guó)30省市的國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值、從業(yè)人員數(shù)的平均影響程度均為正值,分別為1.344、0.169。其中,環(huán)保投資對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)總量的拉動(dòng)作用貢獻(xiàn)較為明顯,相對(duì)而言環(huán)保投資對(duì)就業(yè)情況促進(jìn)作用不強(qiáng)。環(huán)保投資結(jié)構(gòu)分項(xiàng)作用程度不同。在環(huán)保投資結(jié)構(gòu)中,城鎮(zhèn)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)投資的綜合影響程度為0.238,建設(shè)項(xiàng)目“三同時(shí)”項(xiàng)目投資的綜合影響程度為0.130,工業(yè)污染源治理投資的綜合影響程度為0.060,由此可見城鎮(zhèn)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)投資對(duì)環(huán)境質(zhì)量的改善和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的推動(dòng)起到了較強(qiáng)的促進(jìn)作用。我國(guó)各省市的環(huán)保投資效應(yīng)存在地區(qū)差異性。青海、黑龍江、山東這三個(gè)省市的環(huán)保投資對(duì)其環(huán)境和經(jīng)濟(jì)的效應(yīng)較差,而山西、上海、安徽的環(huán)保投資對(duì)其經(jīng)濟(jì)和環(huán)境的促進(jìn)效果最好,綜合影響程度為1.039、0.908、0.906,位居30個(gè)省市的前三名。綜合來看,上海市的環(huán)保投資效應(yīng)發(fā)揮作用最大,其中城鎮(zhèn)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)投資影響程度是全國(guó)均值的2倍多。通過對(duì)我國(guó)30個(gè)省市的環(huán)保投資現(xiàn)狀分析及實(shí)證進(jìn)行分析,針對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)保投資總量不足、投資結(jié)構(gòu)配置不合理、地區(qū)差異較大等問題,最后提出拓寬環(huán)保投資的融資渠道、合理配置環(huán)保投資的流向等一系列相關(guān)的對(duì)策建議,以期優(yōu)化我國(guó)的環(huán)保投資的決策支持,提高我國(guó)環(huán)保投資的環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng),最終實(shí)現(xiàn)環(huán)境質(zhì)量改善的同時(shí),促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of our country's economy, environmental problems become increasingly prominent, and our country pays more and more attention to environmental protection. The proportion of total investment in environmental protection in GDP is increasing year by year. Through the analysis of the current situation of environmental protection investment, it is found that the scale of environmental protection investment in China is still insufficient compared with developed countries. There is irrationality in the structure of environmental protection investment. The "13th Five-Year Plan" emphasizes that during the "13th Five-Year Plan", environmental quality in China will achieve overall improvement, and environmental governance will be regarded as an important task of our governments at all levels. Environmental protection investment is an investment behavior to protect the environment. The scale and structure of environmental protection investment determines the effect of environmental protection investment. In order to measure the environmental and economic effects of environmental protection investment in China, the panel data of 30 provinces and cities (except Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) from 2004 to 2014 are selected. Taking the total amount of environmental protection investment and its structural sub-items as independent variables, using the econometric analysis software EVIEWS 9.0, the environmental and economic effects of environmental protection investment in 30 provinces and cities in China are comprehensively considered, and the panel effect model is used to carry out empirical analysis. The influence degree of environmental protection investment on environmental quality and economic development of 30 provinces and cities is obtained, and the difference of environmental protection investment between different provinces and cities is compared. Environmental protection investment has a positive effect on environmental governance and economic development. Environmental protection investment can improve the energy efficiency of 30 provinces and cities in China. The average influence degree of these two indexes is 0.716 ~ 0.770. This shows that environmental protection investment can promote the environment improvement of our country. The growth of total employment. The average impact of the total investment in environmental protection on the GDP and the number of employees of 30 provinces and cities in China is positive, which is 1.344 or 0.169 respectively. Among them, the contribution of environmental protection investment to the pulling effect of the total economic output is more obvious. Relatively speaking, environmental protection investment does not promote employment situation strongly. The effect of environmental protection investment structure is different. In the structure of environmental protection investment, The comprehensive influence degree of urban infrastructure construction investment is 0.238, that of construction project "three simultaneous" project investment is 0.130, and that of industrial pollution source treatment investment is 0.060. It can be seen from this that urban infrastructure construction can be seen. Investment has played a strong role in promoting the improvement of environmental quality and economic development. There are regional differences in the effects of environmental protection investment in various provinces and cities in China. Environmental protection investment in Heilongjiang and Shandong provinces and cities has a poor impact on their environment and economy, while environmental protection investment in Shanxi, Shanghai, and Anhui has the best impact on their economy and environment. The comprehensive influence degree is 1.039% 0.908% 0.906, ranking the top three of 30 provinces and cities. In a word, the environmental protection investment effect in Shanghai is the most effective. The influence degree of urban infrastructure investment is more than 2 times of the national average. Through analyzing the present situation of environmental protection investment in 30 provinces and cities in China, the paper analyzes the total amount of environmental protection investment in our country is insufficient, and the investment structure allocation is unreasonable. Finally, this paper puts forward a series of relevant countermeasures and suggestions, such as widening the financing channels of environmental protection investment and rationally allocating the flow of environmental protection investment, in order to optimize the decision support of environmental protection investment in China. To improve the environmental and economic effects of environmental protection investment in China, and finally to improve the environmental quality, and promote the coordinated development of the economy at the same time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F124;X196

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳揚(yáng);;我國(guó)環(huán)保投資面臨的問題及對(duì)策[J];環(huán)境;2001年12期

2 ;中國(guó)5800億元環(huán)保投資已見成效[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2003年03期

3 丹丹;;“十一五”環(huán)保投資預(yù)計(jì)達(dá)13750億元[J];給水排水;2005年12期

4 胡玉忠;;濰坊三年環(huán)保投資69．2億元[J];山東農(nóng)藥信息;2005年11期

5 王s，

本文編號(hào)：1542609