本文關(guān)鍵詞： 歐洲 對(duì)外直接投資 區(qū)位選擇　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著近年來(lái)“走出去”戰(zhàn)略的不斷實(shí)施,越來(lái)越多的中國(guó)企業(yè)開(kāi)始走出國(guó)門,在海外投資建廠。中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的規(guī)模呈現(xiàn)快速增長(zhǎng)的勢(shì)頭,這其中,近年來(lái)飽受債務(wù)危機(jī)影響的歐洲國(guó)家成為了中國(guó)投資者的重要目的地,低廉的資產(chǎn)價(jià)格、卓越的國(guó)際品牌以及先進(jìn)的生產(chǎn)技術(shù)都是吸引中國(guó)投資者前往的理由。但歐洲國(guó)家眾多,且經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平、比較優(yōu)勢(shì)各異,選擇在哪些國(guó)家投資,即所謂區(qū)位選擇問(wèn)題,便成了中國(guó)企業(yè)赴歐投資的首要難題。本文就是旨在通過(guò)理論模型、實(shí)證研究等方法,結(jié)合數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)比、擬合等途徑,從中國(guó)企業(yè)在歐洲的地理分布現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),來(lái)研究影響中國(guó)企業(yè)在歐洲分布的主要區(qū)位因素,即究竟是哪些區(qū)位條件的存在使得中國(guó)企業(yè)傾向于投資某國(guó)而不是其他國(guó)家。本文首先在第二章回顧了相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的理論及過(guò)往的研究情況,接著在第三章,文章從宏觀、微觀兩個(gè)層面以及行業(yè)分布、所有權(quán)分布、區(qū)位分布等多個(gè)角度展現(xiàn)了中國(guó)對(duì)歐洲直接投資的現(xiàn)狀。在第四章,文章承上啟下,從前文描述的現(xiàn)狀出發(fā),逐一通過(guò)對(duì)比分析的方法來(lái)初步獲得影響企業(yè)區(qū)位分布的區(qū)位因素,接著又借用波特的鉆石模型為全文的理論分析搭建了框架,最后再通過(guò)區(qū)位因素的量化和實(shí)證分析來(lái)驗(yàn)證前文得出的區(qū)位因素對(duì)直接投資影響的顯著性,進(jìn)而從理論與實(shí)證兩方面的結(jié)合中得出了全文最后的結(jié)論。結(jié)論表明,對(duì)于從事不同行業(yè)類型、不同所有制成分的中國(guó)企業(yè),影響它們對(duì)歐直接投資的具體區(qū)位因素有著明顯的區(qū)別,但從大類上的實(shí)證研究結(jié)果來(lái)看,需求條件、國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略,結(jié)構(gòu)及對(duì)抗、政府政策三大類要素對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)赴歐直接投資的區(qū)位影響都較為顯著；而生產(chǎn)要素、相關(guān)及支撐產(chǎn)業(yè)這兩類要素對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)赴歐直接投資的區(qū)位影響都較不顯著。本文在分析過(guò)程中不但注重經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)據(jù),也重視政府政策、國(guó)家歷史、文化等眾多非經(jīng)濟(jì)因素,因?yàn)檫@些因素對(duì)于外國(guó)直接投資,特別是中國(guó)這樣的發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的所謂“逆向投資”顯得十分重要。
[Abstract]:With the continuous implementation of the "going out" strategy in recent years, more and more Chinese enterprises have begun to go abroad to invest in factories abroad. The scale of China's foreign direct investment has shown a rapid growth momentum, among which, European countries affected by the debt crisis in recent years have become an important destination for Chinese investors, with low asset prices. Excellent international brands and advanced production technology are the reasons for attracting Chinese investors. But European countries have a large number of countries with different levels of economic development and comparative advantages, so they choose which countries to invest in, that is, the so-called location choice problem. This paper aims at analyzing the geographical distribution of Chinese enterprises in Europe by means of theoretical model, empirical research, data comparison, fitting and so on. To study the main location factors that affect the distribution of Chinese enterprises in Europe, That is, which location conditions make Chinese enterprises tend to invest in one country rather than other countries. In the second chapter, this paper reviews the theory and past research in related fields, and then in the third chapter, from the macro perspective, The microcosmic two levels as well as the industry distribution, ownership distribution, location distribution and so on show the present situation of China's direct investment in Europe. One by one through comparative analysis to obtain the location factors that affect the location distribution of enterprises, and then use Porter's diamond model to build a framework for the theoretical analysis of the full text. Finally, through the quantitative and empirical analysis of location factors to verify the significance of the location factors to direct investment, and then from the theoretical and empirical two aspects of the final conclusion. For Chinese enterprises engaged in different industry types and different ownership components, there are obvious differences in the specific location factors that affect their direct investment in Europe. However, from the empirical results of the broad categories of empirical research, demand conditions, national strategies, Structure and confrontation, the three main factors of government policy have significant influence on the location of Chinese enterprises' direct investment to Europe, and the factors of production, The impact of the related and supporting industries on the location of Chinese enterprises' direct investment to Europe is not significant. In the process of analysis, this paper not only pays attention to economic data, but also attaches importance to many non-economic factors, such as government policy, national history, culture and so on. These factors are important for foreign direct investment (FDI), especially for the so-called "reverse investment" of developed countries by developing countries such as China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F279.2;F125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 盧進(jìn)勇,閆實(shí)強(qiáng);中國(guó)企業(yè)海外投資模式比較分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2005年03期

2 柴慶春;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2008年01期

3 王曉紅;李自杰;李耀輝;;改革開(kāi)放30年我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的回顧與展望[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2008年09期

4 吳彬,黃韜;二階段理論:外商直接投資新的分析模型[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1997年07期

5 冼國(guó)明,楊銳;技術(shù)累積、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)策略與發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)外直接投資[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1998年11期

6 項(xiàng)本武;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的貿(mào)易效應(yīng)研究——基于Panel Data的地區(qū)差異檢驗(yàn)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2007年24期

7 張仁開(kāi),杜德斌;跨國(guó)R&D投資的區(qū)位選擇與我國(guó)對(duì)外R&D投資的區(qū)位戰(zhàn)略[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1507383