本文關(guān)鍵詞：泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)外資企業(yè)履行企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的認(rèn)知研究　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任 外資企業(yè) 泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者

【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)60年代開始,許多發(fā)展中國(guó)家為了改變落后的經(jīng)濟(jì)面貌,開始大量引進(jìn)外資。外資的進(jìn)入,給發(fā)展中國(guó)家?guī)砹速Y本、技術(shù)、管理和大量的就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),使一些發(fā)展中國(guó)家的工業(yè)化進(jìn)程大大加快。但是,與此同時(shí),發(fā)展中國(guó)家的環(huán)境問題也開始逐漸加重,從而引起了人們對(duì)外資企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的重視。 現(xiàn)有研究表明,企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的范疇很廣,是企業(yè)對(duì)利益相關(guān)者所承擔(dān)的經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任、法律責(zé)任、倫理責(zé)任、慈善責(zé)任的綜合。所以企業(yè)想要承擔(dān)所有的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任是比較困難的。但是,有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),并不是所有的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任都能影響消費(fèi)者的購(gòu)買行為,甚至企業(yè)的某些社會(huì)責(zé)任活動(dòng)還可能引起消費(fèi)者的反感,他們認(rèn)為這只是企業(yè)想要建立良好形象的一種手段。相關(guān)研究也發(fā)現(xiàn),不同文化背景的消費(fèi)者對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的認(rèn)知往往是不同的,每個(gè)國(guó)家的消費(fèi)者對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是有差異的。 從研究現(xiàn)狀來看,西方國(guó)家對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究已經(jīng)有了比較長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間,但是在發(fā)展中國(guó)家的研究還屬于初步階段,一般只有大概20年的時(shí)間,所以對(duì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家來說企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任研究還是比較新的領(lǐng)域,很多方面還有待進(jìn)行研究。尤其是在泰國(guó),企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究一直沒有受到足夠的重視,研究的數(shù)量比較少,而且比較集中在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)的研究,幾乎沒有進(jìn)行在泰外資企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的研究。因此,本文以泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者為樣本,以在泰國(guó)的美國(guó)、日本和中國(guó)企業(yè)為研究對(duì)象,研究泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)外資企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任履行的認(rèn)知,以豐富該領(lǐng)域的研究。 本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的相關(guān)理論,提出本文的研究模型和假設(shè),通過問卷調(diào)查的方法收集數(shù)據(jù),利用SPSS軟件對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,驗(yàn)證所提出的假設(shè),并為外資企業(yè)在泰國(guó)履行企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任提供建議和啟示。 本研究通過問卷調(diào)研收集了來自泰國(guó)全國(guó)的208份有效樣本。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)不同的泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)外資企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的認(rèn)知是有差異的；同時(shí),泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者認(rèn)為在企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任中經(jīng)濟(jì)責(zé)任最重要,其次是倫理責(zé)任,再次是法律責(zé)任,最后是慈善責(zé)任。此外,關(guān)于對(duì)在泰國(guó)投資的美國(guó)、日本和中國(guó)企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的認(rèn)知,泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)美國(guó)企業(yè)的評(píng)價(jià)最高,其次是日本企業(yè),最后是中國(guó)企業(yè)。 針對(duì)泰國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)外資企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的不同認(rèn)知,本文建議,外資企業(yè)在泰國(guó)應(yīng)重視消費(fèi)者對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任構(gòu)成要素的不同認(rèn)知,應(yīng)突出各個(gè)社會(huì)責(zé)任要素的重點(diǎn),尤其是中國(guó)企業(yè)在泰國(guó)投資時(shí)應(yīng)提高對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的重視程度。
[Abstract]:Since 1960s, in order to change the backward economic outlook, many developing countries have begun to introduce a large number of foreign capital. The entry of foreign capital has brought capital and technology to developing countries. Management and massive employment opportunities have significantly accelerated the industrialization process in some developing countries, but at the same time environmental problems in developing countries have begun to grow. As a result, people pay attention to the social responsibility of foreign-funded enterprises. The existing research shows that the scope of corporate social responsibility is very wide, which is the economic responsibility, legal responsibility and ethical responsibility of the enterprise to the stakeholders. Therefore, it is difficult for enterprises to assume all corporate social responsibility. However, some studies have found that not all corporate social responsibility can affect consumer buying behavior. Even some corporate social responsibility activities may cause disgust among consumers, who believe that this is just a means to create a good image of the business. Relevant research has also found. Consumers from different cultural backgrounds often have different perceptions of corporate social responsibility, and the evaluation criteria of corporate social responsibility are different in each country. From the point of view of the current research situation, the research on corporate social responsibility in western countries has been for a long time, but the research in developing countries is still a preliminary stage, generally only about 20 years. Therefore, for developing countries, corporate social responsibility research is still a relatively new field, many aspects still need to be studied. Especially in Thailand, the research of corporate social responsibility has not been paid enough attention to. The number of research is relatively small, and more focused on domestic enterprises, almost no research on the social responsibility of foreign-funded enterprises in Thailand. Therefore, this paper takes Thai consumers as samples, to the United States in Thailand. In order to enrich the research in this field, Japanese and Chinese enterprises studied the cognition of Thai consumers on the social responsibility performance of foreign companies. On the basis of previous studies, this paper puts forward the research model and hypothesis of this paper by using the theory of corporate social responsibility, collects the data by questionnaire, and analyzes the data by using SPSS software. Verify the hypotheses and provide suggestions and implications for foreign-funded enterprises to fulfill their corporate social responsibility in Thailand. This study collected 208 valid samples from Thailand through questionnaire survey. The study found that different Thai consumers have different perceptions of foreign corporate social responsibility; At the same time, Thai consumers believe that economic responsibility is the most important in corporate social responsibility, followed by ethical responsibility, legal responsibility again, and finally charitable liability. In addition, about the United States of America investing in Thailand. Japanese and Chinese enterprises are perceived to fulfill their social responsibility. Thai consumers have the highest evaluation of American enterprises, followed by Japanese enterprises and Chinese enterprises. In view of the different cognition of Thai consumers on the social responsibility of foreign-funded enterprises, this paper suggests that foreign-funded enterprises should attach importance to the different cognition of the components of CSR among consumers in Thailand. Emphasis should be placed on various elements of social responsibility, especially when Chinese enterprises invest in Thailand, they should pay more attention to corporate social responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F133.6;F270

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董進(jìn)才;黃瑋;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任理論研究綜述與展望[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢;2011年01期

2 何小洲;劉暉;;消費(fèi)者的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任認(rèn)知研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2011年08期

3 劉淑華;孫志梅;李呈;;國(guó)有企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年18期

4 陳祚;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任研究脈絡(luò)梳理與分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年22期

5 劉小霞;江炎駿;;產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、高管激勵(lì)與企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任水平——基于企業(yè)捐贈(zèng)視角[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2011年24期

6 沈洪濤;;現(xiàn)代公司社會(huì)責(zé)任概念的發(fā)端——讀Bowen《商人的社會(huì)責(zé)任》[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會(huì)計(jì);2007年18期

7 洪旭;楊錫懷;;中國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建——以滬深兩市上市公司為例[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2011年11期

8 劉良惠;;論企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的關(guān)系[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

9 朱文忠;;跨國(guó)公司企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任國(guó)別差異性的原因與對(duì)策[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2007年05期

10 姚憶江;郭麗萍;;倫敦怎樣告別“霧都”[J];共產(chǎn)黨員;2008年13期

，

本文編號(hào)：1356360