發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-17 04:11

【摘要】：遵循創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略,高舉自主創(chuàng)新大旗,是中國(guó)在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代背景下謀求國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力持續(xù)提升的必然選擇。人才是創(chuàng)新的主體,是一個(gè)國(guó)家或地區(qū)最重要的核心資源,哪里能集聚數(shù)量多、質(zhì)量高的人才形成人才集聚高地,哪里就能成為創(chuàng)新的制高點(diǎn),就能積累更強(qiáng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)。因此,準(zhǔn)確把握我國(guó)人才集聚的現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展情況,并探索集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的互動(dòng)關(guān)系和影響程度,不僅能為各地政府調(diào)整人才政策提供有益參考,而且能為國(guó)家和區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的持續(xù)提升以及經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定、協(xié)調(diào)地發(fā)展提供行之有效的政策建議。本研究將我國(guó)大陸31個(gè)省市區(qū)按經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r分為東、中、西三個(gè)區(qū)域進(jìn)行分析討論,主要通過理論分析與實(shí)證分析相結(jié)合的研究方法,創(chuàng)新性地從數(shù)量和質(zhì)量?jī)蓚�(gè)層面出發(fā),詳盡解析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段的區(qū)域人才集聚發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,并探索了人才集聚與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的互動(dòng)關(guān)系及相關(guān)關(guān)系。具體而言,本研究首先界定了人才、人才集聚、區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)這3個(gè)關(guān)鍵概念,給出了人才的統(tǒng)計(jì)口徑,并以人才集聚相關(guān)理論、區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)相關(guān)理論以及人才集聚與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的研究綜述為研究開展奠定了充分的理論基礎(chǔ)。隨即,本研究創(chuàng)新性地從數(shù)量和質(zhì)量?jī)蓚�(gè)層面出發(fā),詳細(xì)解析了 2001至2014年期間我國(guó)三大經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)域和31個(gè)省市區(qū)的人才集聚水平以及動(dòng)態(tài)發(fā)展情況,并與其對(duì)應(yīng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)水平進(jìn)行比較,判定發(fā)展的協(xié)調(diào)程度。接著,在對(duì)人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量以及區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)指標(biāo)分別進(jìn)行面板單位根檢驗(yàn)、面板協(xié)整檢驗(yàn)以及格蘭杰因果檢驗(yàn)后,本研究科學(xué)驗(yàn)證了集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間的互動(dòng)關(guān)系。最后,在通過F檢驗(yàn)和Hausman檢驗(yàn)確定了適宜的面板數(shù)據(jù)回歸模型類型和影響形式后,本研究還納入了4項(xiàng)關(guān)鍵的經(jīng)濟(jì)要素指標(biāo)作為控制變量,分別定量測(cè)度了人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響程度,并進(jìn)行比較分析。研究得出以下幾點(diǎn)重要結(jié)論:(1)我國(guó)區(qū)域人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量水平始終是不斷提高的,但近些年來提升速度減緩。人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量水平存在較大的區(qū)域性差異,且與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的發(fā)展協(xié)調(diào)度低。(2)人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)均是相互影響、互為因果的關(guān)系。(3)人才集聚數(shù)量、質(zhì)量均與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,集聚質(zhì)量對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響程度高于集聚數(shù)量。(4)人才集聚尚未成為我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的最主要驅(qū)動(dòng)力,固定資產(chǎn)投資、城市化率、創(chuàng)業(yè)環(huán)境等其他經(jīng)濟(jì)要素對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)同樣具有重要影響作用。
[Abstract]:Following the strategy of innovation-driven development and holding high the banner of independent innovation is an inevitable choice for China to continue to improve its international competitiveness under the background of knowledge economy. Talent is the main body of innovation and the most important core resource of a country or region. Where can the person with high quality form the highland of talent gathering, where he can become the commanding point of innovation, he can accumulate a stronger competitive advantage. Therefore, to accurately grasp the actual development of talent agglomeration in China, and to explore the interactive relationship and influence of quantity and quality of agglomeration on economic growth, can not only provide a useful reference for local governments to adjust their talent policies. Moreover, it can provide effective policy advice for the sustainable improvement of national and regional competitive advantage, economic stability and coordinated development. In this study, 31 provinces and municipalities in mainland China are divided into three regions according to their economic development status: east, middle and west, mainly through the research method of combining theoretical analysis with empirical analysis, and innovatively starting from the two aspects of quantity and quality. This paper analyzes in detail the present situation of regional talent agglomeration in China, and probes into the interactive relationship between talent agglomeration and regional economic growth as well as the correlation between talent agglomeration and regional economic growth. Specifically, this study first defines the three key concepts of talent, talent agglomeration, regional economic growth, gives the statistical caliber of talent, and takes the relevant theory of talent agglomeration. The related theories of regional economic growth and the relationship between talent gathering and regional economic growth have laid a sufficient theoretical foundation for the research. Then, from the aspects of quantity and quality, this study analyzes the level and dynamic development of talent concentration in three economic regions and 31 provinces and municipalities in China from 2001 to 2014. And its corresponding level of economic growth is compared to determine the degree of coordination of development. Then, after carrying out panel unit root test, panel cointegration test and Granger causality test respectively to the quantity, quality and regional economic growth index of talent agglomeration, this study scientifically verifies the agglomeration quantity. The interaction between quality and regional economic growth. Finally, after determining the appropriate regression model type and influence form of panel data through F test and Hausman test, four key economic factors are included as control variables, and the quantity of talent gathering is quantitatively measured. The impact of quality on regional economic growth, and comparative analysis. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the quantity and quality level of regional talent agglomeration in China has always been improving, but in recent years the speed of upgrading has slowed down. There are great regional differences in the quantity and quality of talent agglomeration, and the degree of coordination with the development of regional economic growth is low. (2) the quantity of talent agglomeration, the quality and the regional economic growth all influence each other and cause and effect each other. (3) the quantity of talent agglomeration. The influence of agglomeration quality on regional economic growth is higher than that of agglomeration quantity. (4) talent agglomeration has not become the main driving force of economic growth in China at present, fixed asset investment and urbanization rate. Entrepreneurial environment and other economic factors also have an important impact on economic growth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：C964.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周勇;;江蘇地區(qū)創(chuàng)業(yè)環(huán)境對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展影響的實(shí)證分析[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年07期

2 孫金冬;韋羨玲;;人才聚集與產(chǎn)業(yè)聚集關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年01期

3 蔣曉光;李理;;經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平對(duì)人才聚集的影響分析——以中部和江浙滬地區(qū)為例[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年23期

4 田帆;方衛(wèi)華;;人才流失影響因素研究——基于中國(guó)、俄羅斯、巴西三國(guó)的比較分析[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2014年29期

5 余國(guó)忠;方圓圓;;我國(guó)人才分布現(xiàn)狀及主要影響因素[J];信陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年02期

6 何立華;楊崇琪;;人才環(huán)境及其影響因素——來自武漢的數(shù)據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理評(píng)論;2014年01期

7 李德煌;夏恩君;;人力資本對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響——基于擴(kuò)展Solow模型的研究[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2013年08期

8 沈國(guó)軍;;對(duì)外開放度與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證分析——以河南為例[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年04期

9 高順成;;區(qū)域創(chuàng)業(yè)環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2013年02期

10 朱杏珍;朱彩虹;;人才集聚效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析——以浙江省為例[J];紹興文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué));2012年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2128958