本文選題：上市公司 + 經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展壯大，上市公司在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中的地位越來(lái)越重要，，其經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的好壞也被越來(lái)越多的利益相關(guān)者所關(guān)注。如何科學(xué)有效地評(píng)價(jià)上市公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)，一度成為投資領(lǐng)域和企業(yè)管理領(lǐng)域的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題之一。此外，由于我國(guó)區(qū)域發(fā)展的不均衡性，不同地區(qū)的上市公司所面臨的外部環(huán)境迥然不同，人們?cè)谔接懭绾慰茖W(xué)有效地評(píng)價(jià)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的同時(shí)，也對(duì)區(qū)域因素是否會(huì)影響上市公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)產(chǎn)生了興趣。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行初次選擇和二次篩選，構(gòu)建了上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)指綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型組合起來(lái)對(duì)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。在對(duì)原始數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)念A(yù)處理后，本文評(píng)價(jià)了滬深A(yù)股市場(chǎng)所有非金融類(lèi)上市公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)。然后根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果，對(duì)各地區(qū)的上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)水平進(jìn)行了衡量和比較，并對(duì)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)區(qū)域差異的統(tǒng)計(jì)顯著性進(jìn)行了檢驗(yàn)，最后對(duì)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)總體差異中區(qū)域差異的貢獻(xiàn)度進(jìn)行了衡量。研究結(jié)果表明，各地區(qū)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)水平的總體格局與當(dāng)前區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)格局較為相似，上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的區(qū)域差異在統(tǒng)計(jì)上顯著，表明區(qū)域因素確實(shí)對(duì)上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)有影響。但區(qū)域差異對(duì)上市公司營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)總體差異的貢獻(xiàn)度并不大，說(shuō)明區(qū)域因素并非是上市公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的決定性因素。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's securities market, the status of listed companies in the national economy is becoming more and more important, and the quality of their business performance has been concerned by more and more stakeholders. How to evaluate the performance of listed companies scientifically and effectively has once become one of the hot issues in the field of investment and enterprise management. In addition, due to the imbalance of regional development in China, the external environment of listed companies in different regions is very different. People are exploring how to evaluate the operating performance of listed companies scientifically and effectively at the same time. Also has an interest in whether regional factors will affect the operating performance of listed companies. Through the initial selection and secondary selection of the evaluation index, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the operating performance of listed companies. After proper pretreatment of raw data, this paper evaluates the operating performance of all non-financial listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets. Then, according to the evaluation results, the paper measures and compares the operating performance level of listed companies in various regions, and tests the statistical significance of the regional differences in operating performance of listed companies. Finally, the contribution of regional differences in the overall operating performance of listed companies is measured. The results show that the overall pattern of operating performance of listed companies in various regions is similar to the current regional economic pattern, and the regional differences in operating performance of listed companies are statistically significant. It shows that regional factors do have an impact on the operating performance of listed companies. However, the contribution of regional differences to the overall operating performance of listed companies is not great, which indicates that regional factors are not the decisive factors in the operating performance of listed companies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F224;F272.3;F276.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王沛英;業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法的貢獻(xiàn)與局限[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2003年23期

2 宋紅玉;;基于AHP的商業(yè)銀行經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2007年14期

3 朱順泉,張堯庭;上市公司財(cái)務(wù)狀況理想點(diǎn)評(píng)價(jià)模型的構(gòu)建及實(shí)證研究[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

4 舒波;郝美梅;;基于熵權(quán)TOPSIS法的旅游上市公司績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年09期

5 賈海濤;向洪金;邱長(zhǎng)溶;;粗糙集理論在銀行經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2009年01期

6 王昆,宋海洲;三種客觀權(quán)重賦權(quán)法的比較分析[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2003年06期

7 李圣梅;灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度分析法在企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];價(jià)值工程;2004年07期

8 邱桂賢;;基于模糊層次分析法和TOPSIS的商業(yè)銀行運(yùn)營(yíng)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)[J];寧波職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

9 王松;劉新民;閆春;;企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效動(dòng)態(tài)評(píng)價(jià)模型與應(yīng)用研究[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2012年05期

10 駱s

本文編號(hào)：2100116