發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-04 06:04

  本文選題：高新區(qū)　切入點(diǎn)：產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚　出處：《深圳大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：建立國(guó)家高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)是我國(guó)黨中央、國(guó)務(wù)院為發(fā)展我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)、調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、推動(dòng)傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)改造、增強(qiáng)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力作出的重大戰(zhàn)略部署。我國(guó)高新區(qū)經(jīng)過(guò)將近三十年的發(fā)展,取得了令人振奮的發(fā)展成果,已經(jīng)成為支撐區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的增長(zhǎng)極,推動(dòng)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要力量。產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚作為一種普遍的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)象,在促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)過(guò)程中發(fā)揮著不可忽視的作用,因此受到了政府部門和相關(guān)學(xué)者的高度重視。而高新區(qū)作為高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的聚集區(qū),為產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的發(fā)揮創(chuàng)造了有利條件,產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚也成為推動(dòng)高新區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要?jiǎng)恿�。我�?guó)高新區(qū)的發(fā)展取得了不錯(cuò)的經(jīng)濟(jì)成果,但其產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)是否明顯,產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)是一個(gè)什么樣的水平,以及如何有效發(fā)揮產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)以促進(jìn)我國(guó)高新區(qū)的發(fā)展,是本文要研究的主要問(wèn)題。首先本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,從一般產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚理論出發(fā),結(jié)合高新區(qū)的特殊性,系統(tǒng)分析了高新區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)及其產(chǎn)生機(jī)理,構(gòu)建了高新區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的一個(gè)分析框架。然后在理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,實(shí)證研究分為三部分:第一部分是評(píng)價(jià)我國(guó)高新區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)是否明顯,通過(guò)與我國(guó)高新技術(shù)企業(yè)作對(duì)比,用樣本均值t檢驗(yàn)的方法,檢驗(yàn)兩者之間的差值變量是否顯著異于0,結(jié)果顯示我國(guó)高新區(qū)具有明顯的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)。第二部分是利用Segal模型和修正的Carlino模型去測(cè)度我國(guó)高新區(qū)總體的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng),兩個(gè)模型的結(jié)果均表明我國(guó)高新區(qū)具有明顯的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)。其中Segal模型的結(jié)果表明在1995-2015年間,高新區(qū)規(guī)模每翻一番,生產(chǎn)率提高54.5%,我國(guó)高新區(qū)總體的集聚彈性動(dòng)態(tài)變化是先上升后平穩(wěn)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。第三部分通過(guò)建立高新區(qū)對(duì)母城影響貢獻(xiàn)度的指標(biāo)體系,綜合評(píng)價(jià)了我國(guó)63家高新區(qū)對(duì)母城的影響,并采用灰色關(guān)聯(lián)分析的方法對(duì)63家高新區(qū)對(duì)母城的影響貢獻(xiàn)度進(jìn)行排序,結(jié)果表明老工業(yè)城市的高新區(qū)對(duì)母城的影響貢獻(xiàn)度較大,中西部地區(qū)高新區(qū)對(duì)母城的影響貢獻(xiàn)度普遍高于東部地區(qū)高新區(qū)對(duì)母城的影響貢獻(xiàn)度。最后根據(jù)我國(guó)高新區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀及存在問(wèn)題提出政策建議。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the National High-tech Industrial Development Zone is the Central Committee of the Party of China. The State Council, in order to develop our high-tech industries, readjust the industrial structure, and promote the transformation of traditional industries. After nearly 30 years of development, China's high-tech zones have achieved exciting development results and have become the growth poles that support regional economic development. Industrial agglomeration, as a universal economic phenomenon, plays an important role in promoting economic growth. Therefore, it has been highly valued by government departments and relevant scholars. As a gathering zone of high-tech industries, high-tech zones have created favorable conditions for industrial agglomeration. Industrial agglomeration has also become an important driving force in promoting the economic development of high-tech zones. The development of high-tech zones in China has achieved good economic results, but whether the industrial agglomeration effect is obvious or not, what is the level of industrial agglomeration effect? And how to effectively exert the effect of industrial agglomeration in order to promote the development of high-tech zones in China, is the main problem to be studied in this paper. Firstly, based on the previous studies, this paper starts from the general theory of industrial agglomeration and combines the particularity of high-tech zones. This paper systematically analyzes the industrial agglomeration effect and its production mechanism of high-tech zones, constructs an analytical framework of industrial agglomeration effect of high-tech zones, and then carries out empirical research on the basis of theoretical analysis. The empirical research is divided into three parts: the first part is to evaluate whether the industrial agglomeration effect of high-tech zones in China is obvious, by comparing with high-tech enterprises in China, using the method of sample average t test. The result shows that the industrial agglomeration effect of high-tech zones in China is obvious. The second part is to measure the economic effect of industrial agglomeration in China by using Segal model and modified Carlino model. The results of the two models show that China's high-tech zones have obvious economic effects of industrial agglomeration. The results of the Segal model show that the scale of high-tech zones has doubled from 1995 to 2015. The overall dynamic change of agglomeration elasticity of high and new technology zones in our country is the development trend of rising first and then steady. The third part establishes the index system of the contribution of high-tech zones to the mother city. This paper comprehensively evaluates the influence of 63 high and new technology zones on the mother city in China, and uses the method of grey relational analysis to rank the contribution of 63 new and high technology zones to the home city. The results show that the high and new technology zones of the old industrial cities have a great contribution to the mother city. The contribution of high-tech zones in the central and western regions to the mother city is generally higher than that of the eastern high-tech zones. Finally, some policy suggestions are put forward according to the present situation and existing problems of the industrial agglomeration of high-tech zones in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋洋;;基于勞動(dòng)生產(chǎn)率的中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)研究[J];遼寧工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 王雙;;基于向量誤差修正模型的城市產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)分析——以天津市為例[J];產(chǎn)經(jīng)評(píng)論;2012年05期

3 韓進(jìn)鋒;;基于政府視角的物流產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)探析[J];物流技術(shù);2013年17期

4 邱家學(xué);袁方;;我國(guó)部分省市醫(yī)藥產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)指標(biāo)分析[J];醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)報(bào);2006年11期

5 劉劍鋒;蔣瑞波;;浙江省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的測(cè)算與實(shí)證研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

6 張雪梅;;甘肅省產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2008年08期

7 池建宇;姚林青;;北京市文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[J];中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年08期

8 ;投資主陣地 發(fā)展大引擎——鄭州市依托產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)加大項(xiàng)目投資帶動(dòng)升級(jí)發(fā)展[J];硅谷;2012年03期

9 張敏;;嘉興市浙商回歸投資作用下產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)分析[J];市場(chǎng)研究;2014年01期

10 吳方,李盛利,張輝;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)與區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)[J];農(nóng)機(jī)化研究;2005年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 特約記者 姜建明;瑞金產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)不斷顯現(xiàn)[N];贛南日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 記者 王征;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)凸顯 內(nèi)生發(fā)展動(dòng)力強(qiáng)勁[N];內(nèi)江日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

3 首席記者 賴有生;北斗基地產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)初顯[N];中山日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

4 江濤 汪碧云;歙縣經(jīng)濟(jì)開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)日顯[N];黃山日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

5 欣聞;高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)凸現(xiàn)[N];安徽經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2009年

6 黃興忠;引導(dǎo)擴(kuò)大產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)[N];廣西日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

7 郭光明　張倜;廣東：旅游產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)凸顯[N];中國(guó)旅游報(bào);2012年

8 記者 劉飛 通訊員 孫先銘;山東煤機(jī)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)凸顯[N];中國(guó)煤炭報(bào);2013年

9 李冰 本報(bào)記者 楊曉偉;開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)化工產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)凸顯[N];錦州日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

10 宋杰;沈丘縣產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚區(qū)：突顯產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)[N];河南日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 姬冬梅;FDI、對(duì)外貿(mào)易的臨城產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2014年

2 王瑞雪;區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)產(chǎn)生機(jī)理研究[D];河北工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

3 桑玉停;我國(guó)高新區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)研究[D];深圳大學(xué);2017年

4 孫建飛;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)的影響因素研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

5 王U，

本文編號(hào)：1564411