公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施政府投資效率的評(píng)價(jià)研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施政府投資效率的評(píng)價(jià)研究 出處:《重慶大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施 政府投資效率 系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)理論 霍爾三維結(jié)構(gòu)模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)
【摘要】:政府投資效率,經(jīng)常用于評(píng)價(jià)政府利用有限資源改善區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境和社會(huì)公眾生活水平的行為有效性,它是衡量政府績(jī)效的重要指標(biāo)。建立科學(xué)合理的政府投資效率評(píng)價(jià)體系,是關(guān)系到政府提高資源利用效果,提升區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展導(dǎo)向效力的核心問題。論文以公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目為切入點(diǎn),對(duì)我國(guó)公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施政府投資效率現(xiàn)狀分析,結(jié)合X效率理論、系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)理論、霍爾三維結(jié)構(gòu)模型、模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)等理論的運(yùn)用,構(gòu)建政府投資效率的評(píng)價(jià)體系,回答了誰來評(píng)價(jià)、評(píng)價(jià)什么、拿什么評(píng)價(jià)以及如何評(píng)價(jià)等一系列問題,并提出以下主要結(jié)論: ①通過采用宏觀、中觀、微觀三層次的分析結(jié)構(gòu),分別探討公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施政府投資的規(guī)模效率、結(jié)構(gòu)效率和組織效率,呈現(xiàn)出我國(guó)公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資雖規(guī)模效應(yīng)彰顯,投資結(jié)構(gòu)逐步優(yōu)化但投資項(xiàng)目微觀效率仍低下的現(xiàn)狀,并指明本文政府投資效率研究的重點(diǎn)在于微觀層次的項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià); ②通過比較與分析公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目中各利益相關(guān)者投入資本的專用性和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)大小,選擇政府和社會(huì)公眾為主要評(píng)價(jià)主體,并基于兩者的利益訴求博弈,,最終確立資金效率、時(shí)間效率、功能效率的三維評(píng)價(jià)目標(biāo); ③通過引入霍爾三維結(jié)構(gòu)模型,構(gòu)建政府投資效率評(píng)價(jià)的三維評(píng)價(jià)體系結(jié)構(gòu),并結(jié)合公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施全生命周期的建設(shè)過程,設(shè)計(jì)出具有12個(gè)初始指標(biāo)、42個(gè)終極指標(biāo)的多層次指標(biāo)體系。
[Abstract]:The efficiency of government investment is often used to evaluate the effectiveness of the government's use of limited resources to improve the regional economic environment and the living standards of the public. It is an important indicator to measure the performance of the government. The establishment of a scientific and reasonable evaluation system of government investment efficiency is related to the efficiency of the government to improve the use of resources. The paper takes the public infrastructure project as the breakthrough point, analyzes the present situation of our country's public infrastructure government investment efficiency, combines X efficiency theory, systematic evaluation theory. Hall three-dimensional structure model, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation theory, the construction of the evaluation system of the efficiency of government investment, answered a series of questions, such as who to evaluate, what to evaluate, what to take and how to evaluate. The main conclusions are as follows: 1. By adopting macro, meso and micro analysis structure, the paper discusses the scale efficiency, structure efficiency and organization efficiency of government investment in public infrastructure. Although the scale effect of public infrastructure investment in China is obvious, the investment structure is gradually optimized, but the micro-efficiency of investment projects is still low. It also points out that the emphasis of the research on the efficiency of government investment lies in the project evaluation at the micro level. (2) by comparing and analyzing the specificity and risk of the stakeholders in public infrastructure projects, selecting the government and the public as the main evaluation subjects, and based on the interests of the two game. Finally, the three-dimensional evaluation objectives of capital efficiency, time efficiency and function efficiency are established. 3 by introducing Hall three-dimensional structure model to construct the three-dimensional evaluation system structure of government investment efficiency evaluation, and combined with the construction process of the whole life cycle of public infrastructure, 12 initial indicators are designed. The multi-level index system of 42 ultimate indexes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F283
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馮蘭瑞;論基礎(chǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)市場(chǎng)化及股份制改造[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);1993年08期
2 周希賢,楊代貴;對(duì)我國(guó)服務(wù)型政府建設(shè)的理性探討[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期
3 劉漢屏,周謂兵;公共支出項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)方法初探[J];財(cái)政研究;2000年11期
4 張雷寶;地方政府公共投資研究[J];財(cái)政研究;2004年03期
5 陳學(xué)安;建立我國(guó)財(cái)政支出績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];財(cái)政研究;2004年08期
6 張曉紅;;構(gòu)建公共支出績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的理性思考[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2006年04期
7 馮英浚,高欣,魏松賢;生產(chǎn)有效性與管理有效性[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期
8 萬樂;;淺議我國(guó)政府投資對(duì)民間投資的引導(dǎo)作用[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2009年08期
9 吳建南;張萌;黃加偉;;基于ACSI的公眾滿意度測(cè)評(píng)模型與指標(biāo)體系研究[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期
10 范九利,白暴利,潘泉;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施資本與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)關(guān)系的研究文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年01期
本文編號(hào):1404868
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/quyujingjilunwen/1404868.html