【摘要】：韭農(nóng)的經(jīng)營效益是多少?各地的韭農(nóng)在實(shí)踐中摸索出了多種多樣的經(jīng)營模式,但何種韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營模式最適應(yīng)韭農(nóng)的需要?對韭農(nóng)來說經(jīng)營規(guī)模為多少才最為適宜?這幾個(gè)問題關(guān)系到韭農(nóng)的切身利益,解決好這幾個(gè)問題對于廣大韭農(nóng)更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)自身利益意義重大。本文首先運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法對國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究成果與理論基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行了梳理,并對相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定;然后運(yùn)用描述性分析法對鄒平縣韭菜生產(chǎn)情況進(jìn)行了分析;運(yùn)用描述性分析法與定量分析法對鄒平縣韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營效益進(jìn)行了分析;運(yùn)用描述性分析法和比較分析法對韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營模式進(jìn)行了分析;最后運(yùn)用定量分析法對鄒平縣韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營規(guī)模進(jìn)行了分析。得出以下結(jié)論:(1)鄒平縣韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營歷程可分為小規(guī)模分散經(jīng)營(2000年之前)、規(guī)模緩慢擴(kuò)大經(jīng)營(2000-2005年)和規(guī)�；�(jīng)營(2005年至今)三個(gè)階段。調(diào)查分析表明鄒平縣韭菜種植總面積占蔬菜種植總面積呈現(xiàn)出明顯的增長的趨勢,2015年韭菜種植面積已達(dá)2837.70畝,韭菜種植業(yè)穩(wěn)步發(fā)展。鄒平縣韭菜種植業(yè)的空間分布呈現(xiàn)出聚集于少數(shù)幾個(gè)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的特點(diǎn),目前鄒平縣已經(jīng)形成韓店鎮(zhèn)、碼頭鎮(zhèn)、西董鎮(zhèn)和高新區(qū)四大韭菜核心產(chǎn)區(qū)。(2)2011年至2015年鄒平縣韭農(nóng)每畝總經(jīng)營成本分別為5888.91元、6413.18元、6882.42元、7061.93元、7140.87元,畝產(chǎn)值分別為8363.26元、8774.52元、9350.69元、9693.03元、10086.04元。2011年至2015年鄒平縣韭農(nóng)每畝總經(jīng)營成本增速放緩,畝收益呈現(xiàn)出上升趨勢,能夠?yàn)榫罗r(nóng)增收致富提供有利條件。(3)運(yùn)用logit多元回歸分析找出了鄒平縣韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營效益的影響因素,在韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營效益影響因素當(dāng)中,土地?cái)?shù)量、銷售市場的穩(wěn)定性、戶毛收入和戶現(xiàn)金成本投入這些解釋變量對韭農(nóng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益存在很顯著影響,雇傭勞動(dòng)力是否充足這一解釋變量對韭農(nóng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益存在顯著影響,自身經(jīng)營能力這一解釋變量對韭農(nóng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益存在比較顯著的影響;土地?cái)?shù)量、銷售市場的穩(wěn)定性、戶毛收入、外部技術(shù)服務(wù)力度這些解釋變量對韭農(nóng)的社會(huì)效益存在著很顯著的影響。(4)目前鄒平縣的韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營模式可分為三種,即家庭分散經(jīng)營模式、專業(yè)大戶經(jīng)營模式和專業(yè)合作社經(jīng)營模式。從運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀來看,家庭分散經(jīng)營模式下的韭農(nóng)年齡偏大,文化程度偏低,韭農(nóng)綜合素質(zhì)提高途徑有限,畝效益最高,但總收益有限,市場銷售渠道不穩(wěn)定,帶動(dòng)能力弱;專業(yè)大戶經(jīng)營模式下的韭農(nóng)平均年齡是三種模式中最低的,整體文化程度最高,平均經(jīng)營規(guī)模最大,但畝效益是三種模式中最低的,韭農(nóng)綜合素質(zhì)提高途徑多樣,帶動(dòng)能力較強(qiáng);專業(yè)合作社經(jīng)營模式下的韭農(nóng)平均年齡相對較低,整體文化水平相對較高,韭農(nóng)綜合素質(zhì)提高途徑多樣,銷售市場非常穩(wěn)定,畝效益和總收益均十分可觀,帶動(dòng)能力強(qiáng)。(5)通過比較分析可知,在家庭分散經(jīng)營模式、專業(yè)大戶經(jīng)營模式和專業(yè)合作社經(jīng)營模式中專業(yè)合作社經(jīng)營模式能夠?yàn)楦嗑罗r(nóng)提供穩(wěn)定的市場,為韭農(nóng)提供多樣化的綜合素質(zhì)提高途徑,使韭農(nóng)獲得更多社會(huì)化的服務(wù),保障更多的韭農(nóng)獲得更高的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,同時(shí)也有利于保障韭菜的質(zhì)量安全。鄒平縣三種韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營模式當(dāng)中專業(yè)合作社經(jīng)營模式最具優(yōu)勢,應(yīng)當(dāng)作為鄒平縣現(xiàn)階段重點(diǎn)推廣的韭農(nóng)經(jīng)營模式。(6)鄒平縣韭農(nóng)的經(jīng)營規(guī)模最低不能夠低于6畝,適宜的經(jīng)營規(guī)模為12-26畝,其中最適宜的經(jīng)營規(guī)模為26畝。
[Abstract]:What is the operating benefit of the grower? In practice, a variety of business models have been groped out by the farmers in various parts of the country, but what kind of non-agricultural operation mode is the most suitable for the farmers' needs? How much is the scale of business to the grower? These problems are related to the vital interests of the farmers, and the solution of these problems is of great significance to the large-scale farmers to better realize their own interests. In this paper, the literature research is used to sort out the relevant research results and the theoretical basis at home and abroad, and the relevant concepts are defined; then the production situation of the leek in Zouping County is analyzed by means of descriptive analysis. By means of descriptive analysis and quantitative analysis, the efficiency of agricultural operation in Zouping county was analyzed, and the model of agricultural operation in Zouping county was analyzed by means of descriptive analysis method and comparative analysis method, and the scale of agricultural operation in Zouping county was analyzed by quantitative analysis. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The process of the agricultural operation in Zouping County can be divided into three stages: small-scale decentralized operation (before 2000), slow scale expansion (2000-2005) and large-scale operation (since 2005). The results show that the total area of the Chinese chive in Zouping County is the trend of the increase of the total area of the vegetable. In 2015, the planting area of the chive leek has reached 2837.70 mu, and the cultivation of the leek has been developed steadily. The spatial distribution of the Chinese chive planting in Zouping County is characterized by a few villages and towns, and in present, Zouping County has formed the core production areas of the four leeks in the town of Handian, the town of code, the West Dong and the Hi-tech Zone. (2) The total operating cost per mu in Zouping County, Zouping County,2011 to 2015 is 5888.91 yuan, 6413.18 yuan, 6882.42 yuan, 7061.93 yuan and 7140.87 yuan. The output value per mu is 8363.26 yuan, 8774.52 yuan, 9350.69 yuan, 9693.03 yuan, and 10086.04 yuan. In 2011 to 2015, the total operating cost of the agricultural and agricultural per mu in Zouping County is slowing, and the income of the mu shows a rising trend. And can provide favorable conditions for increasing the income of the farmers and farmers. (3) Using the logit multiple regression analysis to find out the influencing factors of the efficiency of the agricultural operation in Zouping County, and the stability of the land quantity and the sales market among the factors affecting the benefit of the agricultural operation. The input of these explanatory variables to the household gross income and the household cash cost has a significant impact on the economic benefit of the farmers, and whether the employment force is sufficient and the explanation variable has a significant effect on the economic benefit of the farmers, The explanation variable of the self-operating ability has a significant effect on the economic benefit of the grower; the number of land, the stability of the sales market, the gross income of the household and the strength of external technical services have a significant effect on the social benefit of the grower. (4) The current agricultural operation model of Zouping County can be divided into three types, namely, the family dispersed operation mode, the professional large-door operation mode and the professional cooperative operation mode. From the current situation of operation, the farmer's age in the family's decentralized operation mode is too large, the degree of culture is low, the comprehensive quality of the grower is limited, the benefit of the mu is the highest, but the total income is limited, the marketing channel of the market is not stable, and the driving capability is weak; The average age of the farmers in the major business mode is the lowest among the three modes, with the highest overall culture level and the largest average operation scale, but the benefit of the mu is the lowest in the three modes, and the comprehensive quality of the tenant farmers is diversified and the driving capability is strong; The average age of the grower in the operation mode of the professional cooperative is relatively low, the overall cultural level is relatively high, the comprehensive quality of the agricultural and non-agricultural products is improved, the sales market is very stable, the benefit of the mu and the total income are both very significant, and the driving capacity is strong. (5) Through comparative analysis, it can be found that the professional cooperative management model of the professional cooperative management model and the professional cooperative management mode can provide a stable market for the more rural farmers in the home-dispersed operation mode, the professional large-door operation mode and the professional cooperative operation mode, and provides a diversified comprehensive quality improvement way for the farmers, It is also beneficial to guarantee the quality and safety of the Chinese chives. In the three kinds of agricultural and non-agricultural operating modes of Zouping County, the operation mode of the professional cooperative is the most important, and should be used as the primary agricultural operation mode of the key promotion in the present stage of Zouping County. (6) The operation scale of the tenant farmers in Zouping County is not less than 6 mu, and the proper operation scale is 12-26 mu, and the most suitable operation scale is 26 mu.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F327

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓慶齡;;農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營模式的路徑選擇:基于村莊基礎(chǔ)與農(nóng)民訴求的雙重視角——以江漢平原P村為個(gè)案[J];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

2 趙X澎;;小韭菜一畝多掙兩千元[J];農(nóng)村新技術(shù);2015年08期

3 徐大佑;萬文倩;;我國西部傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化經(jīng)營的制度保障研究[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2015年18期

4 邵再立;許作鵬;趙茉;;2014年天津市東麗區(qū)農(nóng)產(chǎn)品成本收益調(diào)查分析報(bào)告[J];天津經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年06期

5 蔡榮;馬旺林;王舒娟;;小農(nóng)戶參與大市場的集體行動(dòng):合作社社員承諾及其影響因素[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年04期

6 劉霞;李宗洙;;諸城市家庭農(nóng)場現(xiàn)狀問題及對策[J];南方農(nóng)業(yè);2015年09期

7 張海鵬;;中國農(nóng)業(yè)家庭經(jīng)營模式創(chuàng)新的基本思路[J];南開學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

8 王永峰;;我國農(nóng)村建立精準(zhǔn)農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營模式的探索[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年03期

9 尹成林;胡衛(wèi);;耕地流轉(zhuǎn)“非糧化”趨勢應(yīng)引起重視[J];中國糧食經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年02期

10 朱萌;齊振宏;鄔蘭婭;李欣蕊;唐素云;;新型農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營主體農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)需求影響因素的實(shí)證分析——以江蘇省南部395戶種稻大戶為例[J];中國農(nóng)村觀察;2015年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 于金富;;構(gòu)建現(xiàn)代中國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的科學(xué)范式[A];社會(huì)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究集萃——全國高校社會(huì)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與實(shí)踐研討會(huì)第21次會(huì)議論文（2007）[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張學(xué)會(huì);農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社縱向一體化研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

2 余滌非;我國農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化龍頭企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王桂彩;上海市農(nóng)戶規(guī)模經(jīng)營意愿的影響因素與適度規(guī)模值研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2015年

2 包祖達(dá);臺(tái)州市椒江區(qū)種糧大戶發(fā)展對策研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

3 武威志;我國農(nóng)村雙層經(jīng)營體制研究[D];浙江理工大學(xué);2010年

4 于明麗;建國以來農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營模式變遷及發(fā)展趨勢探析[D];哈爾濱師范大學(xué);2009年

5 戴媛媛;中國特色農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化經(jīng)營模式研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2465552