【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)在人類活動中的廣泛應(yīng)用,農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率雖然是大大提高了,但有些現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)卻產(chǎn)生了人類歷史上從未出現(xiàn)的環(huán)境和社會問題,并愈演愈烈,成為危及人類生存的困境。隨著人類對自然界改造的不斷深入,人與自然之間的矛盾也越來越多,現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)的負面效應(yīng)逐步被關(guān)注。異化是客觀存在的,現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化也是客觀存在的。本文堅持馬克思主義的科學方法和立場,運用系統(tǒng)分析、交叉研究的方法,從技術(shù)哲學的角度,探索了現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的根源,并提出了一些應(yīng)對現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的策略。第一章是緒論。簡要說明了本文的研究的目的、意義,對國內(nèi)外的相關(guān)研究成果進行了歸納和總結(jié),并介紹了本文的研究方法和創(chuàng)新點。第二章是異化及現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的涵義。通過對黑格爾的客觀精神異化、費爾巴哈的宗教異化以及馬克思的勞動異化思想的梳理,從中得出異化和技術(shù)異化的涵義。馬克思的技術(shù)異化思想是本文研究的理論基礎(chǔ),現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化就是技術(shù)異化在農(nóng)業(yè)方面的體現(xiàn)。第三章是現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的表現(xiàn)。主要體現(xiàn)在對自然生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的破壞(農(nóng)業(yè)資源與能量的過度消耗和破壞農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)環(huán)境)、威脅農(nóng)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量安全和人類健康,以及引發(fā)社會倫理問題(環(huán)境倫理問題、網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息倫理問題和生物技術(shù)倫理問題)這三個方面。第四章是現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的根源。第一個根源是客體根源,包括現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)的雙面性、復雜性以及技術(shù)實施的干預性。第二個根源是主體根源,包括人與自然關(guān)系的割裂、人類主體性認識的有限性以及主體價值觀中的個人主義和享樂主義。第三個是社會層面的根源,包括農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展目標的片面性、法律法規(guī)的不健全以及發(fā)展觀念的不科學。第五章是應(yīng)對現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化的策略。一是要改變主體觀念,以新的發(fā)展理念發(fā)展農(nóng)業(yè)。二是要合理使用技術(shù),努力消除技術(shù)自身的缺陷,實現(xiàn)農(nóng)業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。三是要完善相應(yīng)法律制度,充分發(fā)揮政府職能,為現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)的發(fā)展創(chuàng)造有利的外部環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:With the wide application of modern agricultural technology in human activities, although the efficiency of agricultural production has been greatly improved, some modern agricultural technologies have produced environmental and social problems that have never occurred in the history of human beings, and become more and more serious. Become a dilemma that endangers the survival of mankind. With the deepening of the transformation of nature, there are more and more contradictions between man and nature, and the negative effects of modern agricultural technology have been paid more and more attention. Alienation is an objective existence, and modern agricultural technology alienation is also an objective existence. This paper adheres to the scientific methods and stand of Marxism, applies the methods of systematic analysis and cross-study, explores the origin of the alienation of modern agricultural technology from the angle of philosophy of technology, and puts forward some strategies to deal with the alienation of modern agricultural technology. The first chapter is the introduction. This paper briefly explains the purpose and significance of this study, summarizes the relevant research results at home and abroad, and introduces the research methods and innovations of this paper. The second chapter is the meaning of alienation and modern agricultural technology alienation. Through the analysis of Hegel's objective spirit alienation, Feuerbach's religious alienation and Marx's thought of labor alienation, the meaning of alienation and technology alienation is obtained. Marx's thought of technology alienation is the theoretical basis of this study. Modern agricultural technology alienation is the embodiment of technology alienation in agriculture. The third chapter is the manifestation of the alienation of modern agricultural technology. Mainly reflected in the destruction of natural ecosystems (excessive consumption of agricultural resources and energy and destruction of the agro-ecological environment), threats to the quality and safety of agricultural products and human health, as well as social ethical issues (environmental ethics issues, Network information ethics and biotechnology ethics) these three aspects. The fourth chapter is the root of the alienation of modern agricultural technology. The first one is the object root, including the two sides of modern agricultural technology, the complexity and the intervention of technology implementation. The second one is the subjective root, including the separation of the relationship between man and nature, the limitation of human subjective cognition and individualism and hedonism in subjective values. The third is the root of the social level, including the one-sidedness of the agricultural development goal, the imperfect laws and regulations and the unscientific development concept. The fifth chapter is the strategy to deal with the alienation of modern agricultural technology. First, it is necessary to change the concept of subject and develop agriculture with a new concept of development. Second, we should make rational use of technology, strive to eliminate the defects of technology itself, and realize the sustainable development of agriculture. Third, it is necessary to perfect the corresponding legal system, give full play to the functions of the government, and create a favorable external environment for the development of modern agricultural technology.
【學位授予單位】：江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F323.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐安來;黃國勤;吳登飛;王禮獻;;綠色生態(tài)農(nóng)業(yè)——江西綠色崛起的必然選擇[J];農(nóng)林經(jīng)濟管理學報;2015年05期

2 聞文;林美卿;;我國農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展中的技術(shù)異化問題探析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2014年04期

3 聞文;林美卿;;農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)文明建設(shè)視域下的技術(shù)異化問題探析[J];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2014年07期

4 翁伯琦;張偉利;;試論生態(tài)文明建設(shè)與綠色農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];福建農(nóng)林大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年04期

5 毛牧然;陳凡;;論馬克思的技術(shù)異化觀及其現(xiàn)實意義[J];科學技術(shù)哲學研究;2013年01期

6 陳熠;高盼;;馬克思技術(shù)異化思想探析[J];宿州教育學院學報;2012年06期

7 樊青青;;吉登斯風險社會理論批判——基于資本增值的視角[J];蘭州學刊;2012年06期

8 谷少杰;;馬克思技術(shù)思想探析[J];理論界;2012年01期

9 姜春云;;以生態(tài)文明引領(lǐng)農(nóng)業(yè)農(nóng)村可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];求是;2011年22期

10 王庭芳;;發(fā)展綠色農(nóng)業(yè)與建設(shè)生態(tài)文明[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2010年30期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 聞文;我國現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)技術(shù)異化問題研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2015年

2 趙晶晶;馬克思技術(shù)異化思想及當代啟示研究[D];沈陽師范大學;2014年

，

本文編號：2444443