【摘要】：農(nóng)業(yè)作為國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的基礎(chǔ),改善農(nóng)業(yè)健康可持續(xù)發(fā)展程度、提高農(nóng)民收入水平、保障人民糧食安全,是我國政府一直以來的工作重點。但是由于農(nóng)業(yè)本身低效益、高風(fēng)險的特質(zhì),國家必須通過行政措施進(jìn)行干預(yù)以提高農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展水平,農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策也就應(yīng)運而生。農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的制定,本著解決農(nóng)產(chǎn)品有效供給、提高農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)者收益、拉動農(nóng)業(yè)的總體產(chǎn)出水平、促進(jìn)農(nóng)民持續(xù)增收的原則,農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼不僅可以推動農(nóng)民增收,還能促進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)又好又快發(fā)展。隨著市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼也在經(jīng)歷著改革。然而改革的目的、改革的方向、改革的方式,都是農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革中應(yīng)當(dāng)注意的首要問題,如何評價農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革的績效又成為了制約我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵。目前,關(guān)于農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革績效的評價有一定的局限性,一方面,對于農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策效果的研究評價主要是針對其所帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,而忽略掉了社會效益和政策本身對生態(tài)環(huán)境是否有利或是有害,然而自十八大以來,生態(tài)一直是政府重點強(qiáng)調(diào)的內(nèi)容,導(dǎo)致評價結(jié)果不夠客觀公正;另一方面,各地政府雖然在國家政策統(tǒng)一號召下制定相關(guān)政策,但由于地域文化、發(fā)展水平等方面存在差異,因此各地農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼也不盡相同,但是現(xiàn)存的研究缺乏對某一地區(qū)具體分析并提出針對性的建議對策。為了對沈陽市農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革效果得出更加綜合和客觀的評價,本文以沈陽市農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革為切入點,在閱讀了大量文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)行有目的性的實地調(diào)研,并結(jié)合相關(guān)專家的意見看法,設(shè)定評價指標(biāo),使用德爾菲法賦予上權(quán)重,通過模糊分析法將一些指標(biāo)定量分析。旨在建立一套適合沈陽市的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼改革效果的評價體系,從而使得到的評價結(jié)果更加準(zhǔn)確和客觀。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)沈陽市現(xiàn)行農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策所存在的問題,并針對這些問題提出相關(guān)的解決對策及建議,明確沈陽市今后的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的改革方向,以使農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策更好地服務(wù)于沈陽市農(nóng)業(yè)的發(fā)展,不僅在經(jīng)濟(jì)上取得更高效益,而且能夠平衡其對社會以及生態(tài)環(huán)境的效益影響。
[Abstract]:As the foundation of the national economy, improving the level of healthy and sustainable development of agriculture, raising the income level of farmers and ensuring the food security of the people has been the focus of our government all along. However, because of the low benefit and high risk of agriculture itself, the government must intervene through administrative measures to improve the level of agricultural development, and the agricultural subsidy policy emerges as the times require. The formulation of agricultural subsidy policy, in line with the principle of solving the effective supply of agricultural products, improving the income of agricultural producers, stimulating the overall output level of agriculture and promoting farmers' sustained income increase, agricultural subsidies can not only promote the increase of farmers' income, Also can promote the agricultural economy good and fast development. With the rapid development of market economy, agricultural subsidies are also undergoing reform. However, the aim, direction and way of reform are the most important problems in the reform of agricultural subsidy. How to evaluate the performance of the reform of agricultural subsidy has become the key to restrict the development of agricultural subsidy policy in China. At present, the evaluation of the performance of agricultural subsidy reform has some limitations. On the one hand, the research and evaluation of the effect of agricultural subsidy policy is mainly aimed at the economic benefits it brings. But neglected the social benefits and the policy itself to the ecological environment is advantageous or harmful, but since the 18th National Congress, the ecology has been emphasized by the government, resulting in the evaluation results are not objective and fair; On the other hand, although local governments formulate relevant policies under the unified call of national policies, due to differences in regional culture, development level, and so on, local agricultural subsidies are also different. However, the existing research is lack of specific analysis of a region and put forward targeted countermeasures. In order to get a more comprehensive and objective evaluation on the effect of the reform of agricultural subsidy in Shenyang, this paper takes the reform of agricultural subsidy in Shenyang as the breakthrough point, on the basis of reading a large number of documents, carries out a purposeful field investigation. Combined with the opinions of relevant experts, the evaluation index is set up, and the weight is given by Delphi method, and some indexes are quantitatively analyzed by fuzzy analysis method. The purpose of this paper is to establish an evaluation system for the effect of agricultural subsidy reform in Shenyang, so as to make the evaluation results more accurate and objective. This paper finds out the problems existing in the current agricultural subsidy policy in Shenyang, and puts forward some relevant countermeasures and suggestions to solve these problems, so as to clarify the direction of the reform of the agricultural subsidy policy in Shenyang in the future. In order to make the agricultural subsidy policy better serve the development of agriculture in Shenyang, we can not only obtain higher economic benefit, but also balance its effect on society and ecological environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F812.8;F327

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;2016年農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼全面改革[J];新農(nóng)業(yè);2016年10期

2 李登旺;仇煥廣;呂亞榮;韓煒;;歐美農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策改革的新動態(tài)及其對我國的啟示[J];中國軟科學(xué);2015年08期

3 蔡霞;;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的實施效果、問題及優(yōu)化對策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(上旬刊);2014年10期

4 羅維燕;;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的現(xiàn)狀、問題及建議——兼論歐美直接補(bǔ)貼的經(jīng)驗借鑒[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(上旬刊);2014年08期

5 錢靜斐;李寧輝;;美國有機(jī)農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策:發(fā)展、影響及啟示[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2014年07期

6 王歐;楊進(jìn);;農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼對中國農(nóng)戶糧食生產(chǎn)的影響[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年05期

7 李萬君;李艷軍;;美國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策演變及對我國的啟示[J];農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化研究;2014年03期

8 高玉強(qiáng);沈坤榮;;歐盟與美國的農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼制度及對我國的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2014年02期

9 李冬艷;;農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策應(yīng)適時調(diào)整與完善[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2014年03期

10 譚智心;周振;;農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼制度的歷史軌跡與農(nóng)民種糧積極性的關(guān)聯(lián)度[J];改革;2014年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 劉培生;我國糧食補(bǔ)貼政策的績效研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

2 張淑杰;農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策效果評價研究[D];河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

3 洪自同;農(nóng)機(jī)購置補(bǔ)貼政策實施效果研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2012年

4 占金剛;我國糧食補(bǔ)貼政策績效評價及體系構(gòu)建[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

5 高玉強(qiáng);農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼制度優(yōu)化研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

6 李維林;轉(zhuǎn)軌期中國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼及其效應(yīng)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 邱月壯;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的評價研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2014年

2 余磊;我國農(nóng)業(yè)保險財政補(bǔ)貼的績效評價[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

3 王鋒;我國現(xiàn)行農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2013年

4 黃迎;農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策對增加農(nóng)民收入影響的研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

5 申麗霞;遼寧省農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策效應(yīng)評價研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

6 王丹;江蘇省糧食補(bǔ)貼政策的效應(yīng)分析與改革研究[D];南京財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

7 王艷;美國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策演進(jìn)及其對中國的借鑒[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2011年

8 何澤軍;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策的效果分析與研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

9 周海霞;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼長效機(jī)制研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年

10 高健;我國農(nóng)業(yè)補(bǔ)貼政策改革研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2409502