發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-06 19:38

  本文選題：集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度 + 農(nóng)民權(quán)利　； 參考：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：集體產(chǎn)權(quán)是國家治理農(nóng)村基層社會(huì)的重要經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ),集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度背后體現(xiàn)著“國家—社區(qū)—農(nóng)民”的關(guān)系。前者所包含的村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)實(shí)現(xiàn)了廣大農(nóng)村社區(qū)居民經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的增值,后者則明確規(guī)定著土地的所有權(quán)、經(jīng)營權(quán)、承包權(quán)等權(quán)利束的歸屬,以及農(nóng)民個(gè)人其他資產(chǎn)、村集體資產(chǎn)的劃分、配置與經(jīng)營,兩者也由此構(gòu)成了農(nóng)民生存與發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)。計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代,國家通過建立高度集中封閉的農(nóng)村集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度實(shí)現(xiàn)了國家對農(nóng)民行為自由與發(fā)展空間的高度控制。改革開放后,隨著體制性變遷,國家向鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)賦權(quán)與放權(quán),“國家—社區(qū)—農(nóng)民”之間的關(guān)系變得更為彈性與靈活,鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)獲得了對農(nóng)村集體產(chǎn)權(quán)的實(shí)際運(yùn)行權(quán)利,廣大農(nóng)民經(jīng)濟(jì)自由發(fā)展空間迅速擴(kuò)展。在現(xiàn)代社會(huì),原有產(chǎn)權(quán)制度改革釋放的能量發(fā)揮達(dá)到極限,廣大農(nóng)民的自由發(fā)展再一次受到制約。進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)展廣大農(nóng)民的自由發(fā)展空間,保障新時(shí)期廣大農(nóng)民的各項(xiàng)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展權(quán)利及權(quán)益,需要國家再次向鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)賦權(quán)與放權(quán),推動(dòng)集體產(chǎn)權(quán)的深度分離與開放,以自由、權(quán)利保障及服務(wù)供給獲得基層社會(huì)的認(rèn)同與支持,增強(qiáng)基層社會(huì)的凝聚力與向心力,推動(dòng)基層治理的現(xiàn)代化,促進(jìn)社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。在農(nóng)民權(quán)利及自由發(fā)展能夠得到保障的集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度安排下,農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展態(tài)勢一般是正面大于負(fù)面;而在農(nóng)民權(quán)利及自由發(fā)展受到束縛的集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度安排下,農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展一般會(huì)出現(xiàn)較多的問題。因此,對于當(dāng)下農(nóng)村集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度改革,我們應(yīng)繼續(xù)延續(xù)改革開放以來農(nóng)村集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度變革趨勢,保障農(nóng)民權(quán)利,進(jìn)而實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)民群體更高層次的自由發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Collective property right is an important economic foundation for the country to govern the rural grass-roots society, and the collective property right system embodies the relationship between "state, community and peasants". The village collective economic production activities included in the former have realized the increment of the economic interests of the majority of rural community residents, while the latter has clearly defined the ownership of the land, the right of management, the right to contract, and the ownership of the right bundle of rights, as well as the other assets of the individual peasants. The division, allocation and management of village collective assets form the economic foundation of farmers' survival and development. In the era of planned economy, the state realized the high control of peasants' behavior freedom and development space by establishing a highly centralized and closed system of rural collective property rights. After the reform and opening up, with the institutional changes, the state has empowered and delegated power to the rural society, and the relationship between "state-community-farmer" has become more flexible and flexible, and the rural society has obtained the practical operation right to the rural collective property right. Broad farmer economy free development space expands rapidly. In modern society, the energy released by the reform of the original property right system has reached its limit, and the free development of the peasants has been restricted once again. To further expand the free development space of the broad masses of peasants and to safeguard the rights and interests of all kinds of economic and social development of the broad masses of peasants in the new period, it is necessary for the state to empower and decentralize the rural society again, and to promote the deep separation and opening of collective property rights so as to be free. The rights guarantee and service supply are recognized and supported by the grassroots society, strengthen the cohesion and centripetal force of the grass-roots society, promote the modernization of grass-roots governance, and promote the harmonious and stable development of the society. Under the arrangement of collective property right system in which the rights and free development of peasants can be guaranteed, the situation of rural economic and social development is generally more positive than negative, but under the arrangement of collective property right system in which the rights and free development of peasants are restricted, Rural economic and social development will generally appear more problems. Therefore, for the current reform of the rural collective property rights system, we should continue the reform trend of the rural collective property rights system since the reform and opening up, protect the rights of farmers, and then achieve a higher level of free development of peasant groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.32;D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋洪遠(yuǎn);高強(qiáng);;農(nóng)村集體產(chǎn)權(quán)制度改革軌跡及其困境擺脫[J];改革;2015年02期

2 李增元;;開放、流動(dòng)社會(huì)中的農(nóng)村社區(qū)治理改革與創(chuàng)新[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2014年02期

3 張曉山;;關(guān)于賦予農(nóng)民更多財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年01期

4 葉興慶;;從四個(gè)方面賦予農(nóng)民更多財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2013年12期

5 袁方成;;治理集體產(chǎn)權(quán):農(nóng)村社區(qū)建設(shè)中的政府與農(nóng)民[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

6 關(guān)銳捷;;加快農(nóng)村社區(qū)集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織立法進(jìn)程的調(diào)研思考[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;2012年05期

7 戴威;陳小君;;論農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織成員權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)——基于法律的角度[J];人民論壇;2012年02期

8 曲福田;田光明;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌與農(nóng)村集體土地產(chǎn)權(quán)制度改革[J];管理世界;2011年06期

9 肖衛(wèi);朱有志;肖琳子;;從家庭承包責(zé)任制到集體林權(quán)改革看農(nóng)村產(chǎn)權(quán)制度完善[J];調(diào)研世界;2010年02期

10 歐巧云;;從產(chǎn)權(quán)的視角看我國農(nóng)村土地制度的變遷[J];農(nóng)業(yè)考古;2009年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李增元;分離與融合：轉(zhuǎn)變社會(huì)中的農(nóng)民流動(dòng)與社區(qū)融合[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2103880