科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)視域中的曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2018-03-01 13:25
本文關(guān)鍵詞： 科學(xué)知識社會學(xué) 科學(xué)爭論 曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇?利益 出處：《河南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】：20世紀(jì)70年代以來，科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)（SSK）是在繼默頓范式之后于STS研究領(lǐng)域處于主流地位的理論流派。SSK強調(diào)科學(xué)知識的建構(gòu)是一個社會過程，尤其關(guān)注科學(xué)知識與其社會文化和背景之間的相互關(guān)系，它的全部工作的旨趣在于說明科學(xué)的認(rèn)識因素與社會因素的結(jié)合，在于說明科學(xué)知識的形成過程以及科學(xué)知識成果包含著社會的內(nèi)容�？茖W(xué)知識社會學(xué)用建構(gòu)論的思想解釋科學(xué)知識的形成。英國SSK學(xué)者最早以科學(xué)爭論研究作為他們的研究場點，這些研究視野非常開闊，便于觀察科學(xué)知識的形成過程，并且易于揭示科學(xué)的社會本性。SSK以科學(xué)爭論作為它重要的研究場點，用以表述其相對主義和社會建構(gòu)論的知識主張�？茖W(xué)爭論研究是科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)實現(xiàn)其研究目標(biāo)的不可或缺的途徑。 2009年底，“發(fā)現(xiàn)曹操墓”的消息引發(fā)了一場關(guān)于考古科學(xué)的爭論，眾多學(xué)者、專家卷入這場爭論中。從時間上看曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幙梢苑譃槿齻�階段，反映了爭論的逐步深入。在對西高穴大墓長期的爭論中，對“魏武王”稱謂的質(zhì)疑是貫穿爭論始末的問題。而這一問題的實質(zhì)還是曹操墓的真與假的問題。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇帍摹笆桥c否”的爭論熱潮最后上升到學(xué)術(shù)真假問題的爭論，，而學(xué)術(shù)真假問題是涉及學(xué)術(shù)規(guī)范和專家的學(xué)術(shù)道德的社會問題。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幖仁顷P(guān)于科學(xué)事實爭論也包括關(guān)于科學(xué)理論的爭論。本文利用SSK積累的豐富的案例研究成果，針對曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幍膬?nèi)容、特征以及爭論的過程進(jìn)行探析，思考爭論帶給我們的啟示。在曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幹�，可以看到諸多的爭論集團(tuán)。通過爭論集團(tuán)的顯現(xiàn)，用科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)的利益理論闡釋曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幍膭右虮泔@得非常自洽。把“利益”當(dāng)作一種解釋源泉，對科學(xué)知識的延展和應(yīng)用及其與科學(xué)主體的目標(biāo)之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行社會學(xué)的因果說明，以揭示社會因素對知識形成過程的重要影響。 以SSK的視角看曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇帋Ыo我們深深的啟發(fā)。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幷摷日蔑@了科學(xué)的內(nèi)在價值與社會價值的統(tǒng)一；也體現(xiàn)了在科學(xué)與社會互動以及學(xué)術(shù)交流過程中個人利益的消解，促進(jìn)客觀理論成果的生成。在科學(xué)廣泛地應(yīng)用于當(dāng)今社會的背景下，實現(xiàn)科學(xué)家精神氣質(zhì)的內(nèi)化是其有效地進(jìn)行自我約束的應(yīng)然。要盡可能地凈化科學(xué)研究環(huán)境，避免和減少各種利益對科學(xué)活動的負(fù)面影響，讓科學(xué)更好地服務(wù)于社會。
[Abstract]:Since 1970s, the Sociology of Scientific knowledge (SSK) has been a mainstream school of theory in the field of STS after Merton's paradigm. SSK emphasizes that the construction of scientific knowledge is a social process. Paying particular attention to the interrelationship between scientific knowledge and its sociocultural and background, the whole purpose of its work is to illustrate the combination of scientific cognitive and social factors, The purpose is to explain the forming process of scientific knowledge and the social content of scientific knowledge. The sociology of scientific knowledge explains the formation of scientific knowledge with the idea of constructivism. SSK scholars in England first used scientific debate as the. Their research site, These studies have very broad horizons, facilitate observation of the formation of scientific knowledge, and are easy to reveal the social nature of science. SSK uses scientific debate as its important research site. The scientific argument is an indispensable way for the sociology of scientific knowledge to achieve its research goal. In end of 2009, the news of "the discovery of Cao Cao's Tomb" triggered a debate about archaeological science, in which many scholars and experts were involved. In time, the dispute over the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb can be divided into three stages. Reflecting the gradual deepening of the debate. In the long debate over the Great Tomb of the West Gaocao Cave, The question of the title of "King of Wei Wu" is a question running through the beginning and end of the debate. The essence of this question is still the question of the truth or falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb. The controversy over the authenticity and falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb has finally risen from the "yes or not" debate to the debate on academic truth and falsehood. The problem of academic truth and falsehood is a social problem involving academic norms and experts' academic morality. The controversy over Cao Cao's tomb is not only about scientific facts but also about scientific theory. This paper makes use of the rich case study results accumulated by SSK. Based on the analysis of the contents, characteristics and the process of the dispute over Cao Cao's tomb authenticity, the author thinks about the enlightenment brought to us by the controversy. In the dispute over the tomb authenticity of Cao Cao, we can see many debate groups. Through the emergence of the controversy group, Using the interest theory of sociology of scientific knowledge to explain the motive of the dispute over Cao Cao's tomb is very self-consistent. "interest" is regarded as a source of explanation. In order to reveal the important influence of social factors on the process of knowledge formation, the relationship between the extension and application of scientific knowledge and the objective of scientific subject is explained by sociology. From the perspective of SSK, the controversy over the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb brings us deep inspiration. The controversy over the truth and falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb not only reveals the unity of the intrinsic value of science and the value of society; It also reflects the elimination of personal interests in the process of interaction between science and society and academic exchange, and promotes the formation of objective theoretical achievements. To realize the internalization of scientists' spiritual temperament is the necessary way for them to effectively restrict themselves. It is necessary to purify the scientific research environment as much as possible, to avoid and reduce the negative effects of various interests on scientific activities, and to make science serve the society better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K878.8
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 余顯斌;;曹操和許褚的雙簧[J];雜文月刊(原創(chuàng)版);2011年08期
2 賈若豪;張亞凌;;亂世英雄——我眼里的曹操[J];童話世界(A版);2011年10期
3 仲偉;;曹操:“智”與“力”的完美交融[J];人才資源開發(fā);2011年07期
4 李光斗;;罵了曹操,卻受重用的那些人[J];中外文摘;2011年15期
5 李光斗;;罵了曹操,卻受重用的那些人[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)文萃;2011年13期
6 王宏春;;“用才能人”曹操[J];中國人才;2011年17期
7 葉東;;跟曹操學(xué)用人[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(中旬刊);2010年07期
8 王佳偉;;曹操垂淚為幾人?[J];芳草(經(jīng)典閱讀);2011年06期
9 沈乃o
本文編號：1552146
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/lyjj/1552146.html
本文關(guān)鍵詞： 科學(xué)知識社會學(xué) 科學(xué)爭論 曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇?利益 出處：《河南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型：學(xué)位論文
【摘要】：20世紀(jì)70年代以來，科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)（SSK）是在繼默頓范式之后于STS研究領(lǐng)域處于主流地位的理論流派。SSK強調(diào)科學(xué)知識的建構(gòu)是一個社會過程，尤其關(guān)注科學(xué)知識與其社會文化和背景之間的相互關(guān)系，它的全部工作的旨趣在于說明科學(xué)的認(rèn)識因素與社會因素的結(jié)合，在于說明科學(xué)知識的形成過程以及科學(xué)知識成果包含著社會的內(nèi)容�？茖W(xué)知識社會學(xué)用建構(gòu)論的思想解釋科學(xué)知識的形成。英國SSK學(xué)者最早以科學(xué)爭論研究作為他們的研究場點，這些研究視野非常開闊，便于觀察科學(xué)知識的形成過程，并且易于揭示科學(xué)的社會本性。SSK以科學(xué)爭論作為它重要的研究場點，用以表述其相對主義和社會建構(gòu)論的知識主張�？茖W(xué)爭論研究是科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)實現(xiàn)其研究目標(biāo)的不可或缺的途徑。 2009年底，“發(fā)現(xiàn)曹操墓”的消息引發(fā)了一場關(guān)于考古科學(xué)的爭論，眾多學(xué)者、專家卷入這場爭論中。從時間上看曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幙梢苑譃槿齻�階段，反映了爭論的逐步深入。在對西高穴大墓長期的爭論中，對“魏武王”稱謂的質(zhì)疑是貫穿爭論始末的問題。而這一問題的實質(zhì)還是曹操墓的真與假的問題。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇帍摹笆桥c否”的爭論熱潮最后上升到學(xué)術(shù)真假問題的爭論，，而學(xué)術(shù)真假問題是涉及學(xué)術(shù)規(guī)范和專家的學(xué)術(shù)道德的社會問題。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幖仁顷P(guān)于科學(xué)事實爭論也包括關(guān)于科學(xué)理論的爭論。本文利用SSK積累的豐富的案例研究成果，針對曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幍膬?nèi)容、特征以及爭論的過程進(jìn)行探析，思考爭論帶給我們的啟示。在曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幹�，可以看到諸多的爭論集團(tuán)。通過爭論集團(tuán)的顯現(xiàn)，用科學(xué)知識社會學(xué)的利益理論闡釋曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幍膭右虮泔@得非常自洽。把“利益”當(dāng)作一種解釋源泉，對科學(xué)知識的延展和應(yīng)用及其與科學(xué)主體的目標(biāo)之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行社會學(xué)的因果說明，以揭示社會因素對知識形成過程的重要影響。 以SSK的視角看曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇帋Ыo我們深深的啟發(fā)。曹操墓真?zhèn)沃疇幷摷日蔑@了科學(xué)的內(nèi)在價值與社會價值的統(tǒng)一；也體現(xiàn)了在科學(xué)與社會互動以及學(xué)術(shù)交流過程中個人利益的消解，促進(jìn)客觀理論成果的生成。在科學(xué)廣泛地應(yīng)用于當(dāng)今社會的背景下，實現(xiàn)科學(xué)家精神氣質(zhì)的內(nèi)化是其有效地進(jìn)行自我約束的應(yīng)然。要盡可能地凈化科學(xué)研究環(huán)境，避免和減少各種利益對科學(xué)活動的負(fù)面影響，讓科學(xué)更好地服務(wù)于社會。
[Abstract]:Since 1970s, the Sociology of Scientific knowledge (SSK) has been a mainstream school of theory in the field of STS after Merton's paradigm. SSK emphasizes that the construction of scientific knowledge is a social process. Paying particular attention to the interrelationship between scientific knowledge and its sociocultural and background, the whole purpose of its work is to illustrate the combination of scientific cognitive and social factors, The purpose is to explain the forming process of scientific knowledge and the social content of scientific knowledge. The sociology of scientific knowledge explains the formation of scientific knowledge with the idea of constructivism. SSK scholars in England first used scientific debate as the. Their research site, These studies have very broad horizons, facilitate observation of the formation of scientific knowledge, and are easy to reveal the social nature of science. SSK uses scientific debate as its important research site. The scientific argument is an indispensable way for the sociology of scientific knowledge to achieve its research goal. In end of 2009, the news of "the discovery of Cao Cao's Tomb" triggered a debate about archaeological science, in which many scholars and experts were involved. In time, the dispute over the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb can be divided into three stages. Reflecting the gradual deepening of the debate. In the long debate over the Great Tomb of the West Gaocao Cave, The question of the title of "King of Wei Wu" is a question running through the beginning and end of the debate. The essence of this question is still the question of the truth or falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb. The controversy over the authenticity and falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb has finally risen from the "yes or not" debate to the debate on academic truth and falsehood. The problem of academic truth and falsehood is a social problem involving academic norms and experts' academic morality. The controversy over Cao Cao's tomb is not only about scientific facts but also about scientific theory. This paper makes use of the rich case study results accumulated by SSK. Based on the analysis of the contents, characteristics and the process of the dispute over Cao Cao's tomb authenticity, the author thinks about the enlightenment brought to us by the controversy. In the dispute over the tomb authenticity of Cao Cao, we can see many debate groups. Through the emergence of the controversy group, Using the interest theory of sociology of scientific knowledge to explain the motive of the dispute over Cao Cao's tomb is very self-consistent. "interest" is regarded as a source of explanation. In order to reveal the important influence of social factors on the process of knowledge formation, the relationship between the extension and application of scientific knowledge and the objective of scientific subject is explained by sociology. From the perspective of SSK, the controversy over the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb brings us deep inspiration. The controversy over the truth and falsehood of Cao Cao's tomb not only reveals the unity of the intrinsic value of science and the value of society; It also reflects the elimination of personal interests in the process of interaction between science and society and academic exchange, and promotes the formation of objective theoretical achievements. To realize the internalization of scientists' spiritual temperament is the necessary way for them to effectively restrict themselves. It is necessary to purify the scientific research environment as much as possible, to avoid and reduce the negative effects of various interests on scientific activities, and to make science serve the society better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K878.8
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 余顯斌;;曹操和許褚的雙簧[J];雜文月刊(原創(chuàng)版);2011年08期
2 賈若豪;張亞凌;;亂世英雄——我眼里的曹操[J];童話世界(A版);2011年10期
3 仲偉;;曹操:“智”與“力”的完美交融[J];人才資源開發(fā);2011年07期
4 李光斗;;罵了曹操,卻受重用的那些人[J];中外文摘;2011年15期
5 李光斗;;罵了曹操,卻受重用的那些人[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)文萃;2011年13期
6 王宏春;;“用才能人”曹操[J];中國人才;2011年17期
7 葉東;;跟曹操學(xué)用人[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(中旬刊);2010年07期
8 王佳偉;;曹操垂淚為幾人?[J];芳草(經(jīng)典閱讀);2011年06期
9 沈乃o
本文編號：1552146
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/lyjj/1552146.html
最近更新
教材專著
