公允價(jià)值會計(jì)的順周期效應(yīng)研究
[Abstract]:Fair value accounting has attracted much attention because of its pro-cyclical effect. This paper verifies the transmission mechanism of the pro-cycle effect of fair value accounting, mainly aiming at the transmission mechanism of capital supervision. The financial market experienced relatively large market fluctuations in 2007-2008, which provides data for verifying the pro-cyclical behavior of fair value accounting. Therefore, this paper analyzes the impact of fair value accounting on core capital and whether fair value accounting leads to the fire selling behavior of banks under the crisis condition by using the data of Chinese listed banks in 2007-2008. In order to verify the pro-cyclical effect of fair value accounting. Through the analysis, we find that: (1) transaction financial assets, which can be sold financial assets and hold maturing investment accounting treatment (including fair value changes and loss of assets impairment) have little impact on core capital; (2) among the four types of financial assets, the loan impairment provision has the greatest impact on the core capital, but the loan impairment provision is not measured by fair value, but based on the estimation and judgment of the management; (3) under the condition of crisis, fair value accounting did not lead to fire selling. The data show that most banks have a positive investment in selling financial assets and holding maturing investments, that is, buying related assets. And of the assets sold, most banks had positive investment returns on two financial assets. Therefore, we conclude that fair value accounting does not transmit its pro-cyclical effect through capital supervision mechanism in Chinese listed banks. Finally, we believe that because accounting objectives are inconsistent with those of bank regulation, the goal of accounting is to provide useful information for other information users, such as investors, creditors, and so on. The aim of bank supervision is to maintain the stability of the financial system. While it is important to coordinate the two goals, it is important to stress that maintaining the stability of the financial system is the responsibility of banking regulators and not of standard-setting agencies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:集美大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F233
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 葛家澍;;公允價(jià)值的定義問題——基于美國財(cái)務(wù)會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則157號《公允價(jià)值計(jì)量》[J];財(cái)會學(xué)習(xí);2009年01期
2 孫敏慧;孫楊清;徐詩奕;朱朝暉;;中國金融業(yè)公允價(jià)值會計(jì)順周期效應(yīng)研究——基于上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)[J];中國管理信息化;2010年17期
3 謝平;鄒傳偉;;金融危機(jī)后有關(guān)金融監(jiān)管改革的理論綜述[J];金融研究;2010年02期
4 易憲容;王國剛;;美國次貸危機(jī)的流動性傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制的金融分析[J];金融研究;2010年05期
5 周小川;;金融政策對金融危機(jī)的響應(yīng)——宏觀審慎政策框架的形成背景、內(nèi)在邏輯和主要內(nèi)容[J];金融研究;2011年01期
6 劉紅忠;趙玉潔;周冬華;;公允價(jià)值會計(jì)能否放大銀行體系的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];金融研究;2011年04期
7 羅勝強(qiáng);;公允價(jià)值計(jì)量對我國銀行業(yè)的影響分析[J];會計(jì)研究;2006年12期
8 李紅霞;;公允價(jià)值計(jì)量問題的國際進(jìn)展及其在中國應(yīng)用的思考[J];會計(jì)研究;2008年10期
9 潘秀麗;;非活躍市場條件下金融工具計(jì)量問題研究[J];會計(jì)研究;2009年03期
10 徐晟;;金融穩(wěn)定性與公允價(jià)值會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的優(yōu)化——基于動態(tài)減值準(zhǔn)備的思考[J];會計(jì)研究;2009年05期
本文編號:2363751
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/kuaiji/2363751.html