本文關(guān)鍵詞： 價(jià)值創(chuàng)造活動(dòng) 價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果 價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)的目標(biāo)是價(jià)值最大化,這也是企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)管理的目標(biāo)。對(duì)于企業(yè)本身而言,在資本市場(chǎng)上最基本的價(jià)值創(chuàng)造方式是提高核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,提升業(yè)務(wù)的盈利能力。企業(yè)在價(jià)值創(chuàng)造過(guò)程中涉及多方(實(shí)際控制人、機(jī)構(gòu)投資者、中小權(quán)益投資者和戰(zhàn)略投資者等)利益。不同利益相關(guān)者關(guān)注的是企業(yè)價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的不同方面,不同的企業(yè)行為為不同的利益相關(guān)者帶來(lái)的價(jià)值不同的。因此,無(wú)論在理論上還是現(xiàn)實(shí)中,研究企業(yè)及其利益相關(guān)方的價(jià)值創(chuàng)造和價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文試圖從財(cái)務(wù)角度對(duì)價(jià)值創(chuàng)造活動(dòng)、價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果、價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑三者關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究,得出可供實(shí)踐借鑒的啟示。 本文以三一重工為研究對(duì)象,采用最新的財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù),從財(cái)務(wù)視角運(yùn)用案例研究方法,在文獻(xiàn)綜述和理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上,圍繞“價(jià)值創(chuàng)造和價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)”的主題,分析研究了價(jià)值創(chuàng)造行為、價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果及價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑等三方面問(wèn)題。在價(jià)值創(chuàng)造行為方面,本文研究了資本運(yùn)作和內(nèi)部財(cái)務(wù)資源整合對(duì)企業(yè)的貢獻(xiàn)；在價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果方面,本文通過(guò)傳統(tǒng)財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)計(jì)量和經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值計(jì)量對(duì)價(jià)值創(chuàng)造行為效果進(jìn)行分析；在價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑方面,本文針對(duì)企業(yè)不同利益相關(guān)方研究了實(shí)現(xiàn)方式和效果。 經(jīng)過(guò)研究,本文得到了下列結(jié)論：(1)良好價(jià)值創(chuàng)造須與價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)結(jié)合得當(dāng)；(2)有效配合不同類(lèi)型財(cái)務(wù)活動(dòng)有助于價(jià)值創(chuàng)造和實(shí)現(xiàn)；(3)EVA和傳統(tǒng)財(cái)務(wù)指標(biāo)相結(jié)合是良好價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果衡量方式；(4)不同利益相關(guān)方擁有不同價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)方式。根據(jù)結(jié)論,本文得到的啟示有：(1)注重價(jià)值創(chuàng)造和價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)的傳導(dǎo)對(duì)接；(2)注重資本運(yùn)作和財(cái)務(wù)資源整合的配合作用；(3)價(jià)值創(chuàng)造要以更好的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)；(4)區(qū)分不同利益相關(guān)方的價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)方式有利于價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑的暢通。 本文的研究視角較新穎。本文將價(jià)值活動(dòng)置于公司不同的利益相關(guān)者的多重角度下進(jìn)行分析,突破了簡(jiǎn)單基于某類(lèi)利益相關(guān)者的角度立場(chǎng)分析價(jià)值創(chuàng)造實(shí)現(xiàn)的框架；從研究?jī)?nèi)容上看,本文提出了價(jià)值創(chuàng)造實(shí)現(xiàn)的路線圖,充實(shí)了公司價(jià)值活動(dòng)的邏輯鏈,優(yōu)化了價(jià)值創(chuàng)造活動(dòng)、價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果、價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑的銜接模型；本文也得出較新穎結(jié)論,辯證了一個(gè)銜接良好的“價(jià)值創(chuàng)造活動(dòng)——價(jià)值創(chuàng)造成果——價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑”的價(jià)值循環(huán)模式,并在該模式內(nèi)嵌入資本運(yùn)作、財(cái)務(wù)資源整合兩個(gè)維度的價(jià)值活動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:The goal of the enterprise is to maximize the value, which is also the goal of the financial management of the enterprise. For the enterprise itself, the most basic way to create value in the capital market is to improve the core competitiveness. Enhance the profitability of business. Enterprises in the process of value creation involved in a number of (actual controllers, institutional investors). Different stakeholders focus on different aspects of enterprise value creation, different enterprise behavior brings different value to different stakeholders. Whether in theory or in reality, it is of practical significance to study the value creation and value realization of enterprises and their stakeholders. The relationship between the three ways of value realization is studied, and the enlightenment for practice is obtained. This article takes Sany heavy Industry as the research object, adopts the latest financial data, uses the case study method from the financial angle of view, on the basis of literature review and theoretical analysis, revolves around the theme of "value creation and value realization". In the aspect of value creation behavior, the contribution of capital operation and the integration of internal financial resources to the enterprise, this paper analyzes and studies the value creation behavior, the value creation achievement and the value realization way. In the aspect of value creation results, this paper analyzes the effect of value creation behavior through traditional financial index measurement and economic added value measurement. In the aspect of value realization, this paper studies the realization method and effect for different stakeholders. Through research, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) good value creation must be combined with value realization; 2) effective coordination of different types of financial activities contributes to the creation and realization of value; The combination of EVA and traditional financial indicators is a good measure of value creation. (4) different stakeholders have different ways of value realization. According to the conclusion, the enlightenment of this paper is: 1) focus on value creation and value realization; (2) pay attention to the coordination of capital operation and financial resources integration; (3) value creation should be evaluated by better standards; 4) differentiating the way of value realization among different stakeholders is beneficial to the unimpeded way of value realization. The research perspective of this paper is relatively novel. This paper puts the value activities under the multiple angles of different stakeholders of the company to carry on the analysis. It breaks through the framework of simply analyzing the realization of value creation based on the viewpoint of some kind of stakeholders. From the point of view of the research content, this paper puts forward the road map of value creation realization, enriches the logic chain of company value activity, and optimizes the linking model of value creation activity, value creation achievement and value realization approach. This paper also draws a relatively new conclusion, dialectical a "value creation activity-value creation achievement-value realization approach" value cycle model, and embed the capital operation in this model. Financial resources integration of two dimensions of value activities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F406.7;F426.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王麗南;;關(guān)于EVA、MVA指標(biāo)應(yīng)用的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2010年03期

2 赫然;謝運(yùn)思;;市值管理:從價(jià)值創(chuàng)造到價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)的統(tǒng)一[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2010年24期

3 張崢;徐信忠;;行為金融學(xué)研究綜述[J];管理世界;2006年09期

4 王晶;高建設(shè);寧宣熙;;企業(yè)價(jià)值評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建及評(píng)價(jià)方法實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2009年02期

5 凌文;;央企控股上市公司九大熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究[J];管理世界;2012年01期

6 蔣東生;;過(guò)度投資與企業(yè)價(jià)值[J];管理世界;2011年01期

7 杜江;史天雄;;基于市值管理理論的選股模型應(yīng)用[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

8 黃登仕,周應(yīng)峰;EVA的理論和實(shí)證研究:綜述及展望[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

9 劉安兵;;EVA在公司治理中的激勵(lì)作用[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年10期

10 劉圻;;經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值與企業(yè)價(jià)值管理創(chuàng)新流程模式研究——基于國(guó)資委第22號(hào)令中EVA考核指標(biāo)的應(yīng)用視角[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1471150