發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-16 10:38

【摘要】：弗里德曼是新一代芝加哥學(xué)派的領(lǐng)軍人物,貨幣主義的主要倡導(dǎo)者。在新自由主義成為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)主流的今天,貨幣主義作為新自由主義的一支在中國(guó)有很深刻的影響,而弗里德曼為自由主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)做辯護(hù)的《實(shí)證經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論》是繼門(mén)格爾和施穆勒的方法論之爭(zhēng)以后最具代表性和爭(zhēng)議性的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論,并在一定程度上奠定了弗里德曼在西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)界的地位。本文從政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的角度切入,分析弗里德曼的方法論主張及其貨幣主義對(duì)其方法論的運(yùn)用,可以從一個(gè)新的視角理解新自由主義,揭示以“實(shí)證”、“科學(xué)”自稱(chēng)的新自由主義的偽科學(xué)性。本文主要分為四部分,第一部分是對(duì)弗里德曼方法論理論基礎(chǔ)和淵源的探討,按照歷史和邏輯相統(tǒng)一的原則分別介紹了弗里德曼《方法論》的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)——科學(xué)哲學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)——斯密以來(lái)的經(jīng)濟(jì)自由主義、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論來(lái)源——現(xiàn)象描述層面的“經(jīng)驗(yàn)歸納法”和“邏輯演繹法”。第二部分是本文的核心內(nèi)容,是對(duì)弗里德曼《實(shí)證經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論》的詳細(xì)解讀和定性分析,通過(guò)分析,本文提煉出了弗里德曼方法論的基本論點(diǎn)：理論的目的在于預(yù)測(cè),理論的檢驗(yàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也在于預(yù)測(cè)能力,假設(shè)條件的真實(shí)與否不能成為理論的檢驗(yàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；在此基礎(chǔ)上,分析了弗里德曼的《方法論》為主流經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)帶來(lái)的轉(zhuǎn)向。第三部分是本文的重要內(nèi)容,重點(diǎn)分析弗里德曼的貨幣主義理論對(duì)其經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的應(yīng)用程度,并得出結(jié)論：他的理論對(duì)其方法論的運(yùn)用經(jīng)歷了從遵循到背離的過(guò)程,并且他的方法論最終被證明徹底走向了失敗。第四部分是弗里德曼的方法論對(duì)中國(guó)政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的啟示和借鑒,但這種借鑒要在明確主體和主義的前提下進(jìn)行,因此這一部分首先分析了弗里德曼的主體和主義,隨后指明了中國(guó)政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的主體和主義,在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出了揚(yáng)棄其個(gè)人主義、借鑒其經(jīng)濟(jì)計(jì)量方法的主張。本文在運(yùn)用系統(tǒng)抽象法對(duì)弗里德曼的方法論進(jìn)行研究過(guò)程中,對(duì)于西方主流經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的“實(shí)證”和“抽象”進(jìn)行了新的概念規(guī)定,將“實(shí)證”規(guī)定為現(xiàn)象描述,將“抽象”規(guī)定為“抽取”,這是本文主要的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。另外,本文對(duì)弗里德曼本人及其方法論在西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)歷史和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論史上的地位給出了一個(gè)新的界定。
[Abstract]:Friedman was the leader of the new Chicago School and the leading monetarist. Today, when neoliberalism has become the mainstream of economics, monetarism, as a branch of neoliberalism, has a profound impact in China. Friedman's "empirical Economics Methodology", which defended liberal economics, is the most representative and controversial economic methodology after the controversy between Mengar and Schmueller. To a certain extent, Friedman's position in western economic circles was established. From the angle of political economics methodology, this paper analyzes Friedman's methodology and its application of monetarism, which can be understood from a new angle of view. Science calls itself the pseudo-scientific nature of neoliberalism. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the theoretical basis and origin of Friedman's methodology. According to the principle of the unity of history and logic, it introduces the philosophy foundation of Friedman's Methodology-philosophy of Science. The foundation of economics is the economic liberalism since Smith, the source of economics methodology, the empirical induction and the logical deduction at the level of phenomenon description. The second part is the core content of this paper, which is the detailed interpretation and qualitative analysis of Friedman's Methodology of empirical Economics. Through the analysis, this paper abstracts the basic arguments of Friedman's methodology: the purpose of the theory is to predict, The test criterion of theory also lies in the ability of prediction, and whether the hypothesis condition is true or not cannot become the test standard of theory. On this basis, the paper analyzes the turn of Friedman's methodology for mainstream economics. The third part is the important content of this paper, focusing on the application of Friedman's monetarist theory to its economic methodology, and draws a conclusion that his theory's application of his methodology has gone through a process from following to deviating. And his methodology turned out to be a complete failure. The fourth part is the enlightenment and reference of Friedman's methodology to China's political economy, but this kind of reference should be carried out on the premise of clear subject and doctrine, so this part first analyzes Friedman's subject and doctrine. Then it points out the subject and doctrine of Chinese political economy, and then puts forward the idea of sublation its individualism and using its econometric method for reference. In the course of studying Friedman's methodology with the method of system abstraction, this paper makes a new definition of "positivism" and "abstraction" in mainstream western economics, and defines "positivism" as a description of phenomenon. The main innovation of this paper is to define "abstraction" as "extraction". In addition, this paper gives a new definition of Friedman himself and his methodology in the history of western economics and economics methodology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F091.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 瓦迪·哈拉比;余蕊;;米爾頓·弗里德曼新自由主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的本質(zhì)[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);2007年03期

2 魏知;;米爾頓·弗里德曼：他贏了，他走了[J];名人傳記(財(cái)富人物);2007年01期

3 李和平;弗里德曼的科學(xué)哲學(xué)思想[J];自然辯證法研究;2002年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2335280