地方公共品供給的理論研究
[Abstract]:With the development of finance to public economics, public goods theory, as the main body of public expenditure theory, is becoming more and more important.
At the same time, due to the transformation of government functions, the government is gradually becoming an economic entity.
From the field of general competition, the focus shifted to the provision of high-quality public goods and services for the whole society.
With the gradual deepening of decentralization reform marked by the devolution of financial and administrative power, most of these public goods and services
It is provided by local governments. Therefore, in this macro context, we should study the supply of local public goods.
It is particularly urgent and necessary.
The traditional theory of public goods focuses on putting forward Pareto's condition for effective supply of public goods, such as Samuel.
The rule of "Er son" and its extended form. But for local public goods, because of its regional characteristics,
The diversity of government and the mobility of various factors in different regions are analyzed only from the perspective of normative research.
The development of modern theories shows that most of the theoretical researches on local public goods are
This paper focuses on the empirical problem of whether local public goods are insufficient under various assumptions.
One of the innovations is to comprehensively grasp the existing research and develop it.
A neoclassical general equilibrium model with liquidity, tax competition and other factors is not only theoretically illustrative.
The problem of insufficient supply of public goods and the flow of factors are clarified by revising relevant assumptions such as liquidity.
The importance of sex and intergovernmental competition to overcome the problem of insufficient supply of local public goods.
This article examines the current situation of the supply of local public goods in China, which shows that local governments in China are providing local public services.
There is systematic selectivity bias, i.e. over-supply of public goods in some places and over-supply of public goods in others.
The total supply is insufficient. This is not a special phenomenon of insufficient aggregate but a structural imbalance.
Therefore, as the main innovation of this article, we divide local public goods into
Dominant local public goods (such as development zones, city squares, etc.) that are easy to convey performance information are long and effective.
Slow, "100 year old" hidden local public goods (such as education, medical treatment, etc.), and abandoned the neoclassical model.
China's assumption of a "good" government has shifted to re-examining local government officials in the context of China's special national conditions
Behavioral Goals and Restriction Mechanisms. The main viewpoints are as follows: the central and higher-level-centered objective function and the government-centered objective function
The cadre assessment mechanism, which is the main performance criterion, makes local governments (officials) more inclined to supply dominant places.
Public goods result in selective bias in the supply of local public goods.
One obvious logical problem is that the supply of dominant local public goods is costly.
Even local governments have incentives to supply large quantities of dominant public goods (e.g. big jobs and quick successes).
But constrained by its own financial and budgetary resources, this phenomenon should not be a universal national phenomenon.
I
WP=4
Otherwise, the local finance of some poorer areas will not have gone bankrupt long ago. Another innovation of this paper lies in the proposed land
The concept of cost soft constraints of local governments, pointing out that welfare losses caused by selective bias are not caused by local governments at all
The local government, which is responsible for its own position, is in various forms and means, such as chaos.
From the point of view, we can easily understand that in China
Sometimes the poorer the place, the more likely it is to be "superficial." In contrast, we use it
The signaling model in information economics, illustrated in formal language, is competing for prominence among local governments.
The score predicted by the general theory in the process of transferring performance information to the central government from local public goods
De-equilibrium does not exist, and local governments are in fact in a "prisoner's dilemma" of mixed equilibrium.
The paper further points out that the fundamental reason for the soft constraint of local government cost lies in the pressure of local public on local government.
The lack of force mechanism, in the final analysis, is the problem of democratic system, especially the democratic system at the grassroots level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2004
【分類號】:F062.6
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 韓建;;優(yōu)化我國地方公共品供給結(jié)構(gòu)的財政政策研究[J];河南財政稅務(wù)高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2012年01期
2 李郁芳;孫海婧;;代際公平與代際公共品供給[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2009年03期
3 彭正波;;地方公共產(chǎn)品供給決策中的公眾參與研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2009年03期
4 襲著燕;鄭波;;地方綜合科研機(jī)構(gòu)存在與發(fā)展的理論解釋[J];科學(xué)與管理;2010年04期
5 黃華;楊永均;;政府行為的一種經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)解釋[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2008年12期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王紅巖;公共項目經(jīng)濟(jì)評價體系研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年
2 儲祖旺;中國高;I資問題研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年
3 余璐;生態(tài)補(bǔ)償?shù)恼g供給議價[D];暨南大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 郭旭姣;區(qū)域間公共品利益外溢的財政分析[D];云南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年
2 黃信恒;我國獨立學(xué)院籌資問題與對策研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2011年
3 樓靜;改進(jìn)財政支出方式:理論分析與政策建議[D];浙江大學(xué);2007年
4 孫海婧;代際公共品供給與地方政府競爭的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2007年
5 丁春玲;我國地方政府無序競爭行為的制度分析[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2008年
6 黃河?xùn)|;廣西城市公共物品有效供給評價與對策研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2008年
7 劉擎;農(nóng)村公共文化服務(wù)供給存在問題的對策研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2012年
8 張鳳彪;天津市全民健身公共支出研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號:2200260
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2200260.html