【摘要】：古典學(xué)派中,圍繞經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題形成了許多典型的理論模型,為經(jīng)濟(jì)工作奠定了理論基礎(chǔ)和研究框架。然而,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不斷推進(jìn)理論的變革和完善,在古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論中許多假設(shè)條件距離經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)際本身較遠(yuǎn),特別是空間轉(zhuǎn)移和運(yùn)輸成本,既是實(shí)際問(wèn)題又是理論缺陷,為使經(jīng)濟(jì)理論更恰當(dāng)?shù)慕忉尳?jīng)濟(jì)事實(shí),不同的學(xué)者試圖以新的方法并從新的視角解決古典經(jīng)濟(jì)理論的缺陷,并增強(qiáng)理論解釋力�；诖�,文章選取古典理論的新古典增長(zhǎng)模型、AK模型、產(chǎn)品多樣化模型、熊彼特模型進(jìn)行比較,以更清晰地理解上述兩種理論的差別。
[Abstract]:In the classical school, many typical theoretical models have been formed around the problem of economic growth, which has laid a theoretical foundation and research framework for economic work. However, economic development is pushing forward the reform and perfection of the theory. In classical economic theory, many hypothetical conditions are far from the economic reality, especially the space transfer and transportation cost, which is both a practical problem and a theoretical defect. In order to make economic theory explain economic facts more appropriately, different scholars try to solve the defects of classical economic theory with new methods and from a new perspective, and strengthen the theoretical interpretation. Based on this, this paper selects the neoclassical growth model (AK), product diversification model and Schumpeter model of classical theory to compare and understand the difference between the two theories more clearly.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué);延邊大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)系;
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F061.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 易永錫;王培縣;;基于新古典增長(zhǎng)模型對(duì)中國(guó)二元經(jīng)濟(jì)的分析[J];荊門職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

2 黎德福;黃玖立;;新古典增長(zhǎng)模型:一個(gè)重新表述[J];南開(kāi)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年04期

3 郭志廣;;基于新古典增長(zhǎng)模型的中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)分析[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年01期

4 張煥明;;我國(guó)新古典增長(zhǎng)模型的選擇與分析——基于核算方法與技術(shù)中性假定下要素產(chǎn)出彈性約束的實(shí)證分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)教育;2007年06期

5 周密;;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)展望——基于新古典增長(zhǎng)模型的實(shí)證分析[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年01期

6 王文杰;劉俊峰;;新古典增長(zhǎng)模型:來(lái)自中國(guó)數(shù)據(jù)的驗(yàn)證[J];金融經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年08期

7 徐小飛;龔德恩;;新古典增長(zhǎng)模型與奧肯定律——理論研究與實(shí)證分析[J];嘉興學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

8 沈小波;;資源環(huán)境約束下的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與政策選擇——基于新古典增長(zhǎng)模型的理論分析[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題;2010年05期

9 賀秋碩;;勞動(dòng)力流動(dòng)與收入收斂——一個(gè)改進(jìn)的新古典增長(zhǎng)模型及對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2005年10期

10 霍影;;基于新古典增長(zhǎng)模型的中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)路徑分析[J];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2177103