【摘要】：生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)理論是馬克思政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論體系中的一個(gè)重要組成部分。由于馬克思的生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)觀點(diǎn)是在借鑒和批判前人的觀點(diǎn)時(shí)創(chuàng)造性地提出的,而后世的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家們?cè)陬I(lǐng)會(huì)這一理論實(shí)質(zhì)時(shí)分歧較大,致使生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)理論成為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)界長期爭論不休的主要問題之一。 本文對(duì)古典政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和近些年來國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析和總結(jié),深入分析了馬克思關(guān)于生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)的一般性界定和特殊性界定,同時(shí)針對(duì)目前學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)和價(jià)值創(chuàng)造關(guān)系的理解存在一定的分歧,本文對(duì)生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)和創(chuàng)造價(jià)值的勞動(dòng)之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)論述。在上述分析的基礎(chǔ)之上,結(jié)合生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)一般和生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)特殊,重新認(rèn)識(shí)了社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn),認(rèn)為社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下的生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)應(yīng)具有物質(zhì)規(guī)定性和增值性兩大特征。同時(shí)鑒于近幾年來國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)的生產(chǎn)性問題一直爭論不休,本文又對(duì)服務(wù)業(yè)各個(gè)部門的生產(chǎn)性進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析,在總結(jié)外國服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)的前提之下,結(jié)合生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)理論擬對(duì)我國服務(wù)業(yè)的健康發(fā)展提出政策性的建議。認(rèn)為服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展應(yīng)該以第一、第二產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展為依托,同時(shí)強(qiáng)調(diào)由于服務(wù)業(yè)內(nèi)部的各個(gè)部門的生產(chǎn)性存在很大的差異,在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的過程中他們的作用及重要性是不同的,在發(fā)展的過程中要注意服務(wù)業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)的合理性。
[Abstract]:Production labor theory is an important part of Marx's political economy theory system. Because Marx's viewpoint of productive labor was creatively put forward when drawing lessons from and criticizing the former's views, the economists of later generations were quite different in understanding the essence of this theory. As a result, the theory of productive labor has become one of the main problems in the economic circles. This paper makes a systematic analysis and summary of the classical political economy and the views of domestic and foreign scholars in recent years, and deeply analyzes Marx's general definition and particularity definition of productive labor. At the same time, there are some differences in the understanding of the relationship between productive labor and value creation in the academic circles at present, and the relationship between productive labor and value-creating labor is discussed in detail in this paper. On the basis of the above analysis, combined with the general and special productive labor, we have reunderstood the criteria for the division of productive labor under the conditions of socialist market economy. Under the condition of socialist market economy, the productive labor should have two characteristics: material stipulation and increment. At the same time, in recent years, scholars at home and abroad have been arguing over the productive problems of service industry, and this paper makes a detailed analysis of the production of various sectors of the service industry, and on the premise of summarizing the experience and lessons of the development of foreign service industry, Combined with the theory of productive labor, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions for the healthy development of our service industry. It is believed that the development of the service industry should be based on the development of the first and second industries. At the same time, it is emphasized that their roles and importance in the process of economic development are different because of the great differences in the production of various sectors within the service industry. In the process of development, attention should be paid to the rationality of the internal structure of the service industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：F014.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白暴力;馬克思生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)范疇的兩重性及其統(tǒng)一——兼論社會(huì)主義生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年05期

2 王成稼;關(guān)于生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)和非生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)問題[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年01期

3 趙東安;楊春;;制造業(yè)鏈條上的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的傳導(dǎo)路徑研究——韓國現(xiàn)代化經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)我國的啟示[J];高科技與產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2008年10期

4 尹明善;請(qǐng)關(guān)注“離制造業(yè)”現(xiàn)象[J];中國機(jī)電工業(yè);2003年06期

5 蔣學(xué)模;如何堅(jiān)持和發(fā)展勞動(dòng)價(jià)值學(xué)說[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;1996年Z6期

6 程恩富,汪桂進(jìn);價(jià)值、財(cái)富與分配“新四說”[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2003年05期

7 謝富勝;論生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)和非生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2003年02期

8 胡代光;深化對(duì)勞動(dòng)和勞動(dòng)價(jià)值理論的研究和認(rèn)識(shí)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2002年01期

9 孫冶方;;關(guān)于生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)和非生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng);國民收入和國民生產(chǎn)總值的討論——兼論第三次產(chǎn)業(yè)這個(gè)資產(chǎn)階級(jí)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)范疇以及社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的性質(zhì)問題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1981年08期

10 林略;楊俊萍;但斌;;面向制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)專業(yè)化集聚發(fā)展研究[J];科技管理研究;2007年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 寇雅玲;馬克思生產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)理論研究[D];西北大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張國豐;美國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)發(fā)展研究與我國的對(duì)策選擇[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2168384