本文選題：制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué) + 老制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)　； 參考：《學(xué)海》2016年04期

【摘要】：制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)在中國有其特別重要的地位,這與中國作為轉(zhuǎn)型國家對轉(zhuǎn)型理論有著特別的需求有關(guān)。我們一般把制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分為老制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)。但是這種劃分只是后向的,難以涵括制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的新發(fā)展。演化制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)作為當(dāng)代演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的制度分析法,難以被簡單地歸屬到新老制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中去,體現(xiàn)了對兩者方法論的超越。本文通過界分新老制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與演化制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的不同特點(diǎn),對此作簡要論證。
[Abstract]:Institutional economics has a very important position in China, which is related to China's special demand for transition theory as a transition country. We generally divide institutional economics into old institutional economics and new institutional economics. But this kind of division is only backward, it is difficult to include the new development of institutional economics. As the institutional analysis method of contemporary evolutionary economics, evolutionary institutional economics is difficult to be simply attributed to the new and old institutional economics, which embodies the transcendence of the two methodologies. This paper makes a brief demonstration on the different characteristics of institutional economics and evolutionary institutional economics.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)院農(nóng)村發(fā)展研究所;
【分類號】：F091.349
，

本文編號：2045624