本文選題：全國(guó)性碳交易市場(chǎng) + 邊際減排成本�。� 參考：《軟科學(xué)》2017年12期

【摘要】：基于國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略和減排政策目標(biāo),同時(shí)考慮到行業(yè)碳排放的異質(zhì)性,建立了非參數(shù)共同前沿DDF動(dòng)態(tài)分析模型;并以近三年的截面數(shù)據(jù)作為基期數(shù)據(jù),分別在共同前沿和群組前沿下對(duì)首批納入2017年全國(guó)性碳交易市場(chǎng)的39個(gè)細(xì)分行業(yè)的邊際碳減排成本進(jìn)行了測(cè)算,并對(duì)兩種前沿下的計(jì)算結(jié)果進(jìn)行了比較分析。結(jié)果顯示:兩種前沿下估測(cè)的減排成本有所不同,且差異程度與各行業(yè)的碳強(qiáng)度呈負(fù)相關(guān);計(jì)算所得的加權(quán)平均邊際減排成本分別為0.052和0.091萬(wàn)元/噸,存在顯著差異。最后,基于對(duì)行業(yè)異質(zhì)性的考慮,就碳價(jià)格和定價(jià)機(jī)制問(wèn)題提出相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:Based on the national economic development strategy and emission reduction policy objectives, and considering the heterogeneity of carbon emissions in the industry, a non-parametric common frontier DDF dynamic analysis model is established, and the cross-section data of nearly three years are taken as the base period data. The marginal carbon emission reduction costs of the first batch of 39 subsectors incorporated into the national carbon trading market in 2017 are measured under the common frontier and the group frontier respectively, and the calculated results under the two fronts are compared and analyzed. The results show that the cost of emission reduction estimated under the two frontier conditions is different, and the degree of difference is negatively correlated with the carbon intensity of different industries, and the weighted average marginal emission reduction cost is 0.052 yuan / ton and 910 yuan / ton respectively, which has significant difference. Finally, based on the consideration of industry heterogeneity, the paper puts forward some suggestions on carbon price and pricing mechanism.
【作者單位】： 河海大學(xué)商學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目(41471457) 中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目(2016B09414)
【分類號(hào)】：F832.5;X196
，

本文編號(hào)：2040855