本文選題：馬克思 + “資本積累”　； 參考：《現(xiàn)代哲學》2017年01期

【摘要】：根據《資本論》的相關論述,馬克思是基于一個完全的資本主義世界才提出資本積累概念的。但問題是,當馬克思將資本積累理解為雇傭工人以及所需的生產資料在數量上的增長時,他就不得不考慮資本主義對非資本主義的滲透所帶來的更多無產者,由此,“資本積累”被證明不可能在單一的、完全的資本主義世界中被理解。在馬克思身后,盧森堡、維克斯等人都回應了馬克思理論中的上述難題,盡管盧森堡側重于對非資本主義經濟模式的關切,而維克斯更注重完全的資本主義語境的前設與價值理論之間的矛盾。無論是哪一種思考,都至少說明馬克思的資本積累概念仍有進一步探討和闡釋的理論空間。
[Abstract]:According to the related exposition of Capital, Marx put forward the concept of capital accumulation based on a completely capitalist world. But the problem is, when Marx understood capital accumulation as an increase in the number of workers and the means of production he needed, he had to think about more proletarians from the infiltration of capitalism into non-capitalism. Capital accumulation has proved impossible to understand in a single, complete capitalist world. Behind Marx, Luxembourg, Vickers and others responded to the above difficulties in Marx's theory, although Luxembourg focused on its concerns about the non-capitalist economic model. Vickers pays more attention to the contradiction between the presupposition of complete capitalist context and the theory of value. No matter what kind of thinking, at least it shows that Marx's concept of capital accumulation still has further theoretical space to explore and explain.
【作者單位】： 美國紐約州立大學布法羅分校;中南財經政法大學哲學院;
【分類號】：F091.91
，

本文編號：2026728