本文選題：馬克思 + 農(nóng)業(yè)公社　； 參考：《史學(xué)理論研究》2017年02期

【摘要】："農(nóng)業(yè)公社"是馬克思在給查蘇利奇《復(fù)信草稿》中提出的重要概念。本文在綜合考察法文手稿及相關(guān)原文資料后進(jìn)一步確認(rèn):"農(nóng)業(yè)公社"是馬克思在"農(nóng)村公社"這一當(dāng)時(shí)學(xué)界習(xí)用語基礎(chǔ)上的術(shù)語創(chuàng)新,兩者不可混同;由于有關(guān)日耳曼"農(nóng)業(yè)公社"的研究意味著馬克思在歐洲農(nóng)村公社發(fā)展譜系的認(rèn)識上已開始擺脫"亞細(xì)亞的"歷史觀,因此絕不可把"農(nóng)業(yè)公社"與所謂的"亞細(xì)亞公社"等同起來。盡管如此,因?yàn)?農(nóng)業(yè)公社"概念無論在現(xiàn)實(shí)中還是歷史上都可能與俄國公社的實(shí)際情況不符,所以馬克思最終放棄了對"農(nóng)業(yè)公社"概念的繼續(xù)探討。
[Abstract]:"Agricultural commune" is an important concept put forward by Marx in the draft of Charles sulich. After a comprehensive review of French manuscripts and relevant original documents, this article confirms that "agricultural commune" is an artistic innovation based on the idioms of the "rural commune", which is based on the idioms of the "rural commune" at that time. The study of commune "means that Marx has begun to get rid of the" Asian "view of history in the understanding of the development pedigree of the European commune. Therefore, it must not equate the" agricultural commune "with the so-called" Asian commune ". However, the concept of" agricultural commune "may be in reality or historically with the reality of the Russian commune. The situation is not consistent, so Marx finally abandoned the concept of "agricultural commune" to continue to explore.

【作者單位】： 長安大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院;
【分類號】：A81;F091.91
，

本文編號：1783303