本文選題：消費主義 + 符號象征意義��； 參考：《北京林業(yè)大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文重點引用鮑德里亞對消費社會的批判理論,將符號學引入消費,進一步對消費主義進行剖析。本文在研究消費主義的過程中發(fā)現(xiàn)消費主義有其存在的合理性及某些積極意義,并借鑒中西方對消費主義理論的研究基礎,發(fā)現(xiàn)消費主義是西方資本主義的產(chǎn)物——工業(yè)革命促進資本主義經(jīng)濟的飛速發(fā)展,資本的積累以及資本擴張都刺激了經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。然而,隨著人們生活水平的提高,物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)、生活的需求已無法滿足人日益增長的精神欲望的滿足,人們開始將注意力轉(zhuǎn)移到對“物”的符號意義追求上來,更加強調(diào)商品給人們帶來的精神價值需求。通過商品的符號意義彰顯個人的身份地位、社會財富等。那些擁有大量財富、具有消費能力的人為了獲得欲望的滿足而進行炫耀性、奢侈性、浪費性消費,在一定程度上獲得了虛榮心的滿足,促進了社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。然而,從本質(zhì)上講消費主義是一種與享樂主義、物質(zhì)主義、利己主義相關(guān)的。它將人們對消費欲望的追求當作幸福的實現(xiàn),以資源的浪費以及對自然環(huán)境的破壞作為代價,片面夸大消費對生產(chǎn)的反作用。這種錯誤的、歪曲的消費價值觀最終將會對我們賴以生存的家園造成不可逆的負作用,同時也將對人類的精神價值造成缺失。 本文結(jié)合對中西方國家擺脫消費主義誤區(qū)進行的理論與探索實踐,提出建立良好的符號消費價值觀是走出消費主義誤區(qū)的正確路徑。良好符號消費價值觀的建立需要我們重新賦予消費新的符號意義,以最少的物質(zhì)資源消耗,獲得最強的精神價值、最為豐富的符號意義。良好的符號消費價值觀是以真正的幸福作為人生的至高目標,是真實的、正當?shù)�、真誠的,要求我們走適度消費、綠色消費道路。良好的符號消費價值觀需要我們正確處理好人與自然、人與人、人自身物質(zhì)與精神之間的關(guān)系,通過建立一系列良好的消費價值觀引導人們進行正確消費,走可持續(xù)發(fā)展的道路。
[Abstract]:Based on Baudrillard's critical theory of consumer society, this paper introduces semiotics into consumption and further analyzes consumerism.In the course of studying consumerism, this paper finds that consumerism has its rationality and some positive meanings, and draws lessons from the research foundation of consumerism theory in China and the West.It is found that consumerism is the product of western capitalism-the industrial revolution promotes the rapid development of capitalist economy, and the accumulation and expansion of capital stimulate the economic development.However, with the improvement of people's living standard, the demand of material production and life can no longer satisfy the increasing spiritual desire, people begin to turn their attention to the pursuit of the symbolic meaning of "thing".More emphasis on the value of goods to people's spiritual needs.Through the symbolic significance of commodities, the status of the individual, social wealth and so on.Those who have a lot of wealth and consumption ability to obtain the gratification of desire, luxury, wasteful consumption, to a certain extent, to obtain the satisfaction of vanity, to promote the development of social economy.However, consumerism is essentially associated with hedonism, materialism and egoism.It regards people's pursuit of consumption desire as the realization of happiness and exaggerates the reaction of consumption to production at the cost of waste of resources and destruction of natural environment.This wrong and distorted consumption value will ultimately have an irreversible negative effect on the homeland on which we live and will also cause the loss of the spiritual value of mankind.Based on the theory and practice of getting rid of the misunderstandings of consumerism in China and western countries, this paper puts forward that establishing good symbolic consumption values is the correct way to get out of the misunderstandings of consumerism.The establishment of good symbolic consumption values requires us to re-endow consumption with new symbolic meaning, to consume the least material resources, to obtain the strongest spiritual value and the most abundant symbolic meaning.Good symbolic consumption values take true happiness as the highest goal of life, is true, just, sincere, requires us to take the road of moderate consumption, green consumption.Good symbolic consumption values require us to correctly handle the relationship between man and nature, between man and nature, between man and man, between man's own material and spirit, and to guide people to consume correctly by establishing a series of good consumption values.Follow the path of sustainable development.
【學位授予單位】：北京林業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F014.5;F091.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 尹世杰;關(guān)于生態(tài)消費的幾個問題[J];求索;2000年05期

2 鄒陸林;;走出消費主義的倫理誤區(qū)[J];企業(yè)導報;2010年04期

3 肖顯靜;消費主義文化的符號學解讀[J];人文雜志;2004年01期

4 萊斯利·斯克萊爾,田禾 ,黃平;全球化社會學的基礎[J];社會學研究;1994年02期

5 荊鈺婷;李程程;;消費主義產(chǎn)生的根源分析[J];社科縱橫;2010年10期

6 鄭紅娥;中國的消費主義及其超越[J];學術(shù)論壇;2005年11期

7 陳月明;;商品符號與符號消費[J];浙江社會科學;2006年06期

8 包慶德,張燕;關(guān)于綠色消費的生態(tài)哲學思考[J];自然辯證法研究;2004年02期

，

本文編號：1768217