本文選題：當(dāng)代中國(guó)特色　切入點(diǎn)：歐美資本主義　出處：《政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)評(píng)論》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正今天的題目是《兩個(gè)馬克思及其對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義》。這兩個(gè)馬克思不是強(qiáng)調(diào)老年馬克思和青年馬克思的矛盾,而是強(qiáng)調(diào)馬克思對(duì)《資本論》應(yīng)用價(jià)值的兩種角度、態(tài)度�！顿Y本論》的價(jià)值究竟在哪里?我們今天學(xué)《資本論》的價(jià)值是什么?這是我思考的問題。第一個(gè)馬克思是腳踏英國(guó)大地著眼于歐美資本主義生產(chǎn)方式的馬克思。大家都知道,《資本論》吸收、借鑒、發(fā)展了英國(guó)資產(chǎn)階級(jí)古典政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),《資本論》這部著作是與西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家交流交鋒批判繼承基礎(chǔ)上形成的思想理論體系,所以這個(gè)理論體
[Abstract]:Today's topic is "two Marx and its practical significance to Contemporary Socialism with Chinese characteristics". These two Marx do not emphasize the contradiction between old Marx and young Marx. Instead, it emphasizes Marx's attitude to the applied value of "Capital". Where is the value of "Capital"? What is the value of learning Capital today? This is the question I think about. The first Marx was Marx, who set his foot on the United Kingdom and focused on the capitalist production mode in Europe and the United States. As we all know, "Capital" is absorbed and used for reference. Has developed the British bourgeoisie classical political economy, "Capital" this work is exchanges with the western economist the criticism and the inheritance foundation forms the thought theory system, therefore this theory body
【分類號(hào)】：F091.91;F092.7
，

本文編號(hào)：1631005