本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)組織　切入點(diǎn)：分工與協(xié)作　出處：《吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的概念自改革開放之后被逐步地引入到我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)界。由于產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的概念是被西方學(xué)者提出來的,所以我國(guó)學(xué)者在研究產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的問題時(shí),大都是把西方的經(jīng)濟(jì)理論直接應(yīng)用到我國(guó)的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織問題的分析中。這種類型的文獻(xiàn)多如牛毛,這種形式是十分有害的。因此糾正這種西化的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織思想顯得尤為重要。因此,研究馬克思產(chǎn)業(yè)組織思想有利于改變現(xiàn)有的狀態(tài)。本文認(rèn)為馬克思雖然沒有直接提出產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的概念,但是在馬克思對(duì)資本主義社會(huì)生產(chǎn)變化的描述中暗含著產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的思想。本文認(rèn)為分工是產(chǎn)業(yè)組織演進(jìn)的重要內(nèi)容,分工是組織存在的原因,也是組織存在的基礎(chǔ)。分工的發(fā)展即代表著產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的發(fā)展,企業(yè)內(nèi)部的分工決定企業(yè)內(nèi)部的組織形式,社會(huì)分工決定產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)部的組織形式。因此本文首先針對(duì)分工理論的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展進(jìn)行了梳理,并對(duì)不同時(shí)期具有代表性的學(xué)者(亞當(dāng)·斯密、阿倫·楊格、斯蒂格勒和楊小凱)的分工理論進(jìn)行了評(píng)析,提出了對(duì)馬克思分工理論的繼承與發(fā)展。然后,本文分析了產(chǎn)業(yè)組織持續(xù)演進(jìn)的動(dòng)力。本文認(rèn)為技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是產(chǎn)業(yè)組織不斷演變的動(dòng)力,這是因?yàn)槿绻麤]有技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,在現(xiàn)有的條件下產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的發(fā)展總會(huì)達(dá)到一個(gè)臨界值,從而使得產(chǎn)業(yè)組織停止演進(jìn)。但是,現(xiàn)實(shí)世界產(chǎn)業(yè)組織始終是處于變化的過程中,本文認(rèn)為這是因?yàn)榧夹g(shù)進(jìn)步的不斷發(fā)展。本文對(duì)于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和科技創(chuàng)新做出了區(qū)別,認(rèn)為科技創(chuàng)新包含技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,同時(shí)還包括那些不是為了追求剩余價(jià)值最大化的創(chuàng)新,而技術(shù)創(chuàng)新則是服務(wù)于資本的創(chuàng)新。因此技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是推動(dòng)產(chǎn)業(yè)組織不斷演進(jìn)的重要力量,同時(shí)介紹了馬克思的壟斷和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)理論、企業(yè)規(guī)模理論對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)組織演進(jìn)的推動(dòng)作用。隨后,本文分析了產(chǎn)業(yè)組織演進(jìn)的內(nèi)在動(dòng)因,即資本為了獲取更多的剩余價(jià)值,不斷地?cái)U(kuò)大企業(yè)的規(guī)模。之后,通過分析馬克思對(duì)資本主義生產(chǎn)方式演變的過程的描述,即資本主義從簡(jiǎn)單的手工工廠到以分工為基礎(chǔ)的手工工廠再到機(jī)器大工業(yè)的工廠形式的演變過程,展示了資本主義產(chǎn)業(yè)組織是如何通過分工的形式進(jìn)行演進(jìn)的。機(jī)器大工業(yè)之后,資本主義形成了福特制,進(jìn)而形成以精益模式為主體的企業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)化組織形式,隨后形成了靈活雇傭組織形式。組織形式的改變使得資本剝削剩余價(jià)值的方法的得到了改變,但是并沒有改變資本的本性。本文全面系統(tǒng)地闡述了馬克思的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織思想,并著重分析了產(chǎn)業(yè)組織演進(jìn)的形式、動(dòng)因以及推動(dòng)力量。并分析了我國(guó)的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織現(xiàn)狀,提出了產(chǎn)業(yè)組織改進(jìn)的建議。
[Abstract]:The concept of industrial organization has been gradually introduced into Chinese economic circles since the reform and opening up. Since the concept of industrial organization has been put forward by western scholars, Chinese scholars are studying the problem of industrial organization. Most of the western economic theories are directly applied to the analysis of industrial organization problems in China. There are a lot of documents of this kind. This form is very harmful. Therefore, it is particularly important to correct this westernized idea of industrial organization. The study of Marx's thought of industrial organization is conducive to changing the existing state. Although Marx did not put forward the concept of industrial organization directly, However, in Marx's description of the changes in production in capitalist society, the idea of industrial organization is implied. This paper holds that the division of labor is an important part of the evolution of industrial organization, and the division of labor is the reason for the existence of the organization. The development of division of labor represents the development of industrial organization. The division of labor within the enterprise determines the internal organizational form of the enterprise. The social division of labor determines the internal organizational form of the industry, so this paper first combs the emergence and development of the division of labor theory, and presents a representative of scholars in different periods (Adam Smith, Allen Young. Stigler and Yang Xiaokai's theory of division of labor are analyzed, and the inheritance and development of Marx's theory of division of labor are put forward. This paper analyzes the motive force of the continuous evolution of industrial organization. This paper holds that technological innovation is the driving force of continuous evolution of industrial organization, which is because if there is no technological innovation, the development of industrial organization will always reach a critical value under the existing conditions. However, the real world industrial organization is always in the process of change, this paper believes that this is because of the continuous development of technological progress. This paper makes a distinction between technological innovation and scientific and technological innovation. It is considered that technological innovation includes technological innovation, which is not for the purpose of maximizing surplus value, and technological innovation is innovation that serves capital. Therefore, technological innovation is an important force to promote the continuous evolution of industrial organization. At the same time, it introduces Marx's theory of monopoly and competition, and the role of enterprise scale theory in promoting the evolution of industrial organization. Then, this paper analyzes the internal motivation of the evolution of industrial organization, that is, capital in order to obtain more surplus value. After that, by analyzing Marx's description of the evolution of the capitalist mode of production, That is, the evolution of capitalism from simple manual factories to handmade factories based on division of labour to factory forms in large machine industries, It shows how capitalist industrial organization evolves through the form of division of labor. After the big machine industry, capitalism formed the Ford system, and then formed the enterprise network organization form with lean mode as the main body. Then the flexible employment organization form was formed. The change of organization form changed the method of exploiting surplus value of capital, but it did not change the nature of capital. The paper mainly analyzes the form, motivation and driving force of the evolution of industrial organization, and analyzes the present situation of industrial organization in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of industrial organization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F091.91;F062.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王金秋;;資本積累體制、勞動(dòng)力商品化與靈活雇傭[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2017年01期

2 周建軍;;美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):從產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)政策到產(chǎn)業(yè)組織政策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2017年01期

3 楊銳;劉志彪;;新產(chǎn)業(yè)革命下產(chǎn)業(yè)組織變化的效率改進(jìn)與實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年06期

4 杜傳忠;寧朝山;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下產(chǎn)業(yè)組織變革探析[J];河北學(xué)刊;2016年04期

5 戚聿東;;產(chǎn)業(yè)組織優(yōu)化與企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力提升的創(chuàng)新之作——《產(chǎn)業(yè)組織與企業(yè)成長(zhǎng)》評(píng)介[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2016年05期

6 蘇秦;王潔;劉丹;;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和產(chǎn)業(yè)組織對(duì)重大裝備產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響[J];軟科學(xué);2016年02期

7 丁堡駿;魏旭;;馬克思價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)形視閾下的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移思想[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年09期

8 孟捷;馮金華;;部門內(nèi)企業(yè)的代謝競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與價(jià)值規(guī)律的實(shí)現(xiàn)形式——一個(gè)演化馬克思主義的解釋[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年01期

9 王思遠(yuǎn);余思勤;;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)組織研究綜述[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2014年10期

10 戚聿東;劉健;;第三次工業(yè)革命趨勢(shì)下產(chǎn)業(yè)組織轉(zhuǎn)型[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1629387