發(fā)布時間：2018-03-15 03:30

  本文選題：《資本論》　切入點：資本轉(zhuǎn)型理論的發(fā)展邏輯　出處：《華僑大學》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 對于《資本論》的解讀,歷來國內(nèi)大多相關文獻的研究和傳統(tǒng)政治經(jīng)濟學教科書存在著四大方面的缺陷:一是對自由資本主義沒有做歷史階段的細分,二是沒有區(qū)分內(nèi)外規(guī)定的兩個層面,三是沒有區(qū)分一般過程和特殊過程兩類不同性質(zhì)的過程;四是沒有突出主體方面的研究。針對上述情況,筆者提出并試圖論證《資本論》存在著理論的轉(zhuǎn)型,而且轉(zhuǎn)型的理論邏輯是嚴格按照四個方面展開的:一是,三個研究階段的遞進和兩次重大的轉(zhuǎn)型;二是,資本運動過程是兩類過程的區(qū)別和統(tǒng)一,即一般過程和特殊過程相互促進、影響;三是,理論內(nèi)容包含兩個層面,即內(nèi)在規(guī)定和外在表現(xiàn),隨著研究階段的遞進,內(nèi)外規(guī)定都發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)型;四是,區(qū)分兩大主體,即主導主體資本家階級和從屬主體工人階級,主要考察主導主體的觀念、行為、需要、能力等方面的變化、發(fā)展。 論文包括五個部分:第一部分,根據(jù)客觀的歷史事實,在《資本論》中把自由資本主義階段劃分為“初級階段”和“比較發(fā)達階段”,并在此基礎上結(jié)合資本理論具體化的三個邏輯階段,即資本主義起點的簡單商品、資本主義初級階段的單個資本運動、資本主義比較發(fā)展階段的社會總資本運動,提出并論證邏輯發(fā)展階段是歷史發(fā)展階段的理論反映,而且隨著階段的上升,理論規(guī)定也必然會發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)型;第二部分,根據(jù)客觀經(jīng)濟過程的歷史性質(zhì),區(qū)分為一般過程和特殊過程兩類性質(zhì)不同的過程,研究并闡發(fā)《資本論》中兩類過程是相互促進、影響的,并隨著研究階段的上升而轉(zhuǎn)型;第三部分,根據(jù)客觀對象的“二重性”存在,即直接性層面和間接性層面的統(tǒng)一,提出《資本論》資本理論也是區(qū)分為兩大層面,一是內(nèi)在規(guī)定,二是外在表現(xiàn),并且通過“直接性——間接性——直接性和間接性統(tǒng)一”的方法,研究并論證了隨著邏輯發(fā)展階段的遞進,內(nèi)外規(guī)定都發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)型;第四部分,提出并闡發(fā)了馬克思在《資本論》中主體方面的研究,主要是主導主體資本家階級的需要、能力的發(fā)展,以及觀念、行為等方面內(nèi)容隨著邏輯發(fā)展階段的遞進而變化、轉(zhuǎn)型。第五部分,從四大方面分別闡述了“資本轉(zhuǎn)型理論的發(fā)展邏輯”研究的價值。
[Abstract]:As for the interpretation of Capital, there are four major defects in the study of most relevant literature and the traditional political economy textbooks in China: first, there is no division of the historical stage of liberal capitalism. The second is that there is no distinction between the two levels of internal and external provisions, the third is that there is no distinction between the general process and the special process, the other is that there is no research on the subject. The author puts forward and attempts to prove that there exists a theoretical transformation in Capital, and the theoretical logic of the transition is strictly carried out according to four aspects: first, the progression of the three stages of research and two major transformations; second, The process of capital movement is the difference and unity of the two kinds of processes, that is, the general process and the special process promote each other and influence each other; third, the theoretical content includes two levels, namely, the internal regulation and the external performance, with the gradual development of the research stage. The fourth is to distinguish the two main bodies, that is, the leading subject, capitalist class and subordinate subject working class, and mainly investigate the change and development of the dominant subject's concept, behavior, need, ability and so on. The paper includes five parts: the first part, according to the objective historical facts, In Capital, the stage of free capitalism is divided into "primary stage" and "relatively developed stage", and on this basis, three logical stages of concretization of capital theory are combined, that is, simple commodities at the beginning of capitalism. The single capital movement in the primary stage of capitalism and the total social capital movement in the comparative development stage of capitalism put forward and demonstrated that the logical development stage is the theoretical reflection of the historical development stage, and with the rise of the stage, The second part, according to the historical nature of the objective economic process, is divided into two kinds of processes: general process and special process. The study and analysis of the two kinds of processes in Capital promote each other. The third part, according to the existence of "duality" of objective object, that is, the unification of directness and indirectness, the capital theory of Capital is divided into two levels. The first is the internal regulation, the second is the external performance, and through the method of "directness, directness, directness and indirectness", the author studies and demonstrates that with the gradual development of logic, both internal and external regulations are transformed; part 4th, This paper puts forward and expounds Marx's research on the subject in Capital, which is mainly about the needs of leading subject capitalist class, the development of ability, the concept and behavior, and so on, which changes with the development of logic. Part 5th expounds the value of the development logic of capital transformation theory from four aspects.
【學位授予單位】：華僑大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：F091.91

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王瑜曉;;從《資本論》看歸納與演繹的辯證關系[J];西華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年S1期

2 李雪蓮;欒蘭;;論“從抽象上升到具體”與“分析和綜合”的統(tǒng)一[J];重慶工學院學報(社會科學版);2008年04期

3 郭華,劉清紀;《資本論》的邏輯及其方法論原理的普適性[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2000年09期

4 于金富,王勝利;從《資本論》結(jié)構重新認識政治經(jīng)濟學研究對象[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2001年03期

5 衛(wèi)興華;《資本論》的研究對象、結(jié)構和學習的意義[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2002年11期

6 石晶瑩;《資本論》是以勞動價值論為基礎的邏輯嚴密的理論體系[J];當代經(jīng)濟研究;2004年08期

7 陳俊明;;《資本論》:客體與主體統(tǒng)一[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學版);2006年10期

8 蔡志剛,陳承明;《資本論》與西方經(jīng)濟學的價值理論比較[J];經(jīng)濟學家;2001年04期

9 唐正東;《資本論》:馬克思新唯物主義哲學發(fā)展的第四個階段[J];江蘇行政學院學報;2005年04期

10 馬衛(wèi)剛;關于《資本論》范疇分析方法論的系統(tǒng)性原則研究[J];理論學刊;2002年05期

，

本文編號：1614259