本文關(guān)鍵詞： 創(chuàng)新集群 集群要素 集群結(jié)構(gòu)　出處：《華中科技大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：創(chuàng)新集群是以技術(shù)創(chuàng)新為核心，以新知識(shí)生產(chǎn)、新產(chǎn)品大量出現(xiàn)為本質(zhì)特征，通過組織之間各種正式和非正式連接互動(dòng)形成的復(fù)雜立體、動(dòng)態(tài)開放的技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)系統(tǒng)。創(chuàng)新集群的發(fā)展集聚了創(chuàng)新資源，提高了創(chuàng)新效益，實(shí)現(xiàn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)的急劇增長(zhǎng)，，同時(shí)也促成了產(chǎn)業(yè)的升級(jí)和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng)。隨著人們對(duì)創(chuàng)新集群發(fā)展優(yōu)勢(shì)的認(rèn)識(shí)不斷提高，創(chuàng)新集群的理論研究逐漸成為政府和學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注的重點(diǎn)。許多專家學(xué)者和科技政策制定者開始思考如何培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)新集群的問題。要培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)新集群，首先需要明確創(chuàng)新集群的內(nèi)部構(gòu)成及結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系。對(duì)創(chuàng)新集群內(nèi)部構(gòu)成及結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究，不僅完善了創(chuàng)新集群的理論體系，也為創(chuàng)新集群系統(tǒng)的協(xié)同演化研究奠定理論基礎(chǔ)，對(duì)培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)新集群具有重要的指導(dǎo)意義。 本文在對(duì)創(chuàng)新集群理論的研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外典型的集群案例，從地理和技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)兩個(gè)空間維度對(duì)創(chuàng)新集群的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了界定，對(duì)創(chuàng)新集群的特征和構(gòu)成要素進(jìn)行總結(jié)，然后以系統(tǒng)工程理論、網(wǎng)絡(luò)組織理論和協(xié)同論為指導(dǎo)，明確構(gòu)成要素的功能定位，形成創(chuàng)新集群的結(jié)構(gòu)模型。創(chuàng)新集群具有根植性、復(fù)雜多樣性的、動(dòng)態(tài)開放性的特征，主要由企業(yè)、高校與科研機(jī)構(gòu)、中介服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)、政府、金融機(jī)構(gòu)等主體要素，以及知識(shí)、技術(shù)、信息等資源要素構(gòu)成。在結(jié)構(gòu)模型中，企業(yè)、高校與科研機(jī)構(gòu)構(gòu)成集群的核心網(wǎng)絡(luò)層，它們之間主要以產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈和知識(shí)創(chuàng)新鏈為紐帶，存在不同環(huán)節(jié)主體之間縱向的協(xié)同關(guān)系、同一環(huán)節(jié)不同主體之間的橫向協(xié)作關(guān)系，以及同一環(huán)節(jié)同類主體之間的橫向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)系；中介服務(wù)、政府和金融機(jī)構(gòu)構(gòu)成服務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)層，與核心網(wǎng)絡(luò)層主體之間主要存在合作關(guān)系、交易關(guān)系、協(xié)調(diào)與被協(xié)調(diào)的關(guān)系。最后，以張江科技園為案例，證實(shí)文章形成的理論成果是符合實(shí)際的，并對(duì)其發(fā)展模式進(jìn)行總結(jié)，從管理體制、政府鼓勵(lì)扶持、產(chǎn)業(yè)培育、科研支撐、創(chuàng)新環(huán)境建設(shè)五個(gè)方面提出培養(yǎng)創(chuàng)新集群的措施建議。
[Abstract]:Innovation cluster is a complex three-dimensional system formed by the interaction of various formal and informal connections between organizations with the core of technological innovation, the production of new knowledge and the emergence of new products in large quantities. The development of innovation cluster gathers innovative resources, improves innovation efficiency, and realizes rapid economic growth. At the same time, it also contributed to the upgrading of industry and the growth of regional economy. The theoretical research of innovation cluster has gradually become the focus of government and academic circles. Many experts, scholars and science and technology policy makers begin to think about how to cultivate innovation cluster. First of all, it is necessary to make clear the internal structure and structural relationship of innovation cluster, which not only improves the theoretical system of innovation cluster, but also lays a theoretical foundation for the collaborative evolution of innovation cluster system. It has important guiding significance to cultivate innovative clusters. On the basis of combing the research literature of innovation cluster theory and combining the typical cluster cases at home and abroad, this paper defines the connotation of innovation cluster from the two spatial dimensions of geography and technology economy. This paper summarizes the characteristics and elements of innovation cluster, and then, under the guidance of system engineering theory, network organization theory and synergy theory, defines the functional orientation of component elements and forms the structural model of innovation cluster. The characteristics of complex diversity and dynamic openness are mainly composed of enterprises, universities and scientific research institutions, intermediary services, government, financial institutions and other main elements, as well as knowledge, technology, information and other resource elements. Enterprises, universities and scientific research institutions constitute the core network layer of the cluster. They are mainly linked by industrial chain and knowledge innovation chain. As well as the horizontal competition relationship between the same subject in the same link; intermediary service, government and financial institution constitute the service network layer, and there are mainly cooperative relations, transaction relations, coordination and coordinated relations between the core network layer and the main body of the core network layer. Finally, the relationship between the intermediary service, the government and the financial institution is coordinated. Taking Zhangjiang Science and Technology Park as a case, it is proved that the theoretical results formed by the article are in line with reality, and its development model is summarized, from the management system, government encouragement and support, industry cultivation, scientific research support, Five aspects of innovation environment construction proposed measures to cultivate innovative clusters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：F062.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龍果;;論技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的聚集和創(chuàng)新集群的形成[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年17期

2 倪外;曾剛;滕堂偉;;區(qū)域創(chuàng)新集群發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵要素及作用機(jī)制研究——以日本創(chuàng)新集群為例[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2010年02期

3 王緝慈;;創(chuàng)新集群 高新區(qū)未來之愿景與目標(biāo)[J];中國(guó)高新區(qū);2006年10期

4 魯遇;;張江高科技園區(qū):從“物理聚集”到“化學(xué)催化”——訪張江(集團(tuán))有限公司總經(jīng)理陳劍波教授[J];長(zhǎng)三角;2005年06期

5 莊謙漢;;“集群張江”的四大成果——張江高科技園區(qū)副總經(jīng)理陸方舟訪談[J];長(zhǎng)三角;2005年06期

6 耕夫;顧博;謝佳婷;;相約張江 共謀未來——“相約張江·國(guó)家高新區(qū)培育發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)主題論壇”側(cè)記[J];中國(guó)高新區(qū);2010年08期

7 余曉泓;;創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)集群模塊化網(wǎng)絡(luò)組織創(chuàng)新機(jī)制研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2010年08期

8 葉建亮;知識(shí)溢出與企業(yè)集群[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2001年03期

9 苑全馳;;從產(chǎn)業(yè)集群到創(chuàng)新集群——集群經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的方向和對(duì)策研究[J];江南論壇;2006年02期

10 曹健林;;加強(qiáng)創(chuàng)新載體建設(shè) 推動(dòng)創(chuàng)新集群發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)科技產(chǎn)業(yè);2007年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 盧軍;區(qū)域自主創(chuàng)新體系中政府角色研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1520952