公允價(jià)值計(jì)量與上市公司價(jià)值實(shí)證研究
[Abstract]:The fair value of the assets and liabilities of the company is a reflection of its market value, while the change of the fair value reflects the fluctuation of the market value of the assets and liabilities, so that the fair value measurement model can reflect the value of the company in the changing market to a certain extent. For investors, the accounting information measured by fair value is more useful for decision-making than historical cost measurement. However, the financial crisis in 2008 shows that fair value measurement reflects the characteristics of market volatility in a timely manner, and may also distort the real value of companies and aggravate market volatility. Then, after the financial crisis, the application status of fair value measurement in China and its impact on the value of listed companies are of practical significance to continue to promote the application of fair value measurement in our country. This paper takes Tobin Q value as the index to measure the value of listed companies, selects the listed companies in financial industry as the research object, and expounds and discusses the relationship between fair value measurement and the value of listed companies in the current stage of our country. First of all, the relevant literature at home and abroad is sorted out and summarized, from which the research ideas are summarized. On the basis of the research results of previous scholars, the relevant theories about fair value measurement and corporate value are expounded respectively, and the internal relationship between fair value measurement and corporate value is expounded. Then the research hypothesis is deduced, the empirical model and related variables are designed, and the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share financial industry in China are selected as the research object, and the research period is determined as 2010 / 2012. The descriptive statistical analysis and empirical test of the research samples are carried out by using SPSS18.0 statistical software. Finally, based on the above theoretical basis and empirical test results, the research conclusions are drawn, and some suggestions are put forward for listed companies, regulators and investors in the financial industry. Although in theory, the profit and loss of fair value change affects the value of listed company through net profit, but its amount accounts for only a small part of the net profit, and there is no significant correlation between the change of fair value profit and loss and the value of listed company. The change of fair value of available financial assets affects the value of listed companies through net assets, and the recognized amount of fair value changes has a great influence on net assets. It is tested that the change of fair value of available financial assets is negatively correlated with the value of listed companies. The analysis results of model 2 show that there are obvious differences in the regression coefficients of earnings per share and net assets per share before and after excluding the influence of fair value measurement, and the regression coefficients of excluding the latter two become smaller, which indicates that the fair value measurement of profit and loss of comprehensive fair value change and fair value change of available financial assets does have an impact on the value of listed companies in the financial industry, but this effect is not very effective. Fair value measurement does not distort the value of listed companies in the financial industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:石家莊鐵道大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F233;F275;F276.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張先治;季侃;;公允價(jià)值計(jì)量與會(huì)計(jì)信息的可靠性及價(jià)值相關(guān)性——基于我國(guó)上市公司的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年06期
2 王志亮;寇超;;論公允價(jià)值與企業(yè)價(jià)值的關(guān)系[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2010年24期
3 鄧英;企業(yè)內(nèi)在價(jià)值界定新探[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2005年20期
4 管考磊;;公允價(jià)值順周期效應(yīng)的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2012年14期
5 余燕;;企業(yè)價(jià)值理論研究[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2013年06期
6 鄧雪雅;;淺談會(huì)計(jì)公允價(jià)值計(jì)量及美國(guó)金融危機(jī)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2009年05期
7 李立新;;上市公司價(jià)值理論及其影響因素分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2007年06期
8 鄧傳洲;;公允價(jià)值的價(jià)值相關(guān)性:B股公司的證據(jù)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2005年10期
9 姜國(guó)華;張然;;穩(wěn)健性與公允價(jià)值:基于股票價(jià)格反應(yīng)的規(guī)范性分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2007年06期
10 葛家澍;;關(guān)于在財(cái)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)中采用公允價(jià)值的探討[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2007年11期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張鳳元;上市公司價(jià)值與公允價(jià)值變動(dòng)的相關(guān)性實(shí)證研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年
本文編號(hào):2506225
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jiliangjingjilunwen/2506225.html