本文選題：農(nóng)村基層 + 監(jiān)督　； 參考：《重慶大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)目前行政村的數(shù)量大約超過(guò)68萬(wàn)個(gè),農(nóng)村人口約有9.4億,其中約有500萬(wàn)名包括村黨支部書(shū)記和村主任在內(nèi)的“村官”。“蒼蠅之腐不遜于老虎”。村官是群眾對(duì)干部形象最直接的認(rèn)知,是群眾透視政府公信和干部形象的窗口。農(nóng)村基層腐敗問(wèn)題是真正直入群眾眼簾的腐敗問(wèn)題,對(duì)群眾來(lái)說(shuō),這些看得見(jiàn)的腐敗問(wèn)題遠(yuǎn)比高官腐敗更印象深刻,也更容易激發(fā)民怨�！吧n蠅式”腐敗絕對(duì)不容輕視,這些腐敗問(wèn)題嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了干部形象,造成了極壞的社會(huì)影響。近年來(lái),懲治的基層干部腐敗案件數(shù)以萬(wàn)計(jì),若細(xì)細(xì)研究會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),每個(gè)都各有特點(diǎn),偏重更是各式各樣,甚至說(shuō)已經(jīng)滲透到了與群眾有關(guān)的各個(gè)角落。從惠民補(bǔ)貼、征地拆遷、政策落實(shí)等多方面截留,從行賄受賄、霸道鄉(xiāng)里、貪污公款等多種方式腐敗。如果說(shuō)“老虎”的腐敗是披著隱身衣的暗箱操作,那么“蒼蠅式腐敗”就是單刀直入的大膽妄為,純粹是簡(jiǎn)單直白的與民爭(zhēng)利。因此,探索怎樣更好的對(duì)村干部進(jìn)行有效的監(jiān)督和管理,對(duì)解決農(nóng)村基層腐敗問(wèn)題具有深遠(yuǎn)的影響。本人圍繞農(nóng)村基層“蒼蠅式”腐敗這一重要的社會(huì)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,以KZ區(qū)近年來(lái)的各種典型案件為例,在本人參與調(diào)查處理的案件上與實(shí)地調(diào)查研究的基礎(chǔ)上開(kāi)展論述。論文通過(guò)對(duì)本人從事案件查處工作以來(lái)的腐敗相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)的統(tǒng)計(jì)匯總分析,歸納出村干部“蒼蠅式”腐敗案件呈現(xiàn)出的具體特征。同時(shí),通過(guò)參與的一連串現(xiàn)實(shí)案例闡述了“村官"腐敗影響了社會(huì)穩(wěn)定、損害了村集體和村民利益、阻礙了農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、損害了黨和政府的形象、強(qiáng)危害了社會(huì)風(fēng)氣;論文經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)文獻(xiàn)資料進(jìn)行歸納整理和認(rèn)真進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析,從想腐敗、能腐敗、敢腐敗三個(gè)方面分析了“蒼蠅式”腐敗發(fā)生的原因,想腐敗的原因包括村干部文化素質(zhì)普遍偏低、部分村干部存在封建腐朽思想、金錢(qián)世俗文化和潛規(guī)則盛行、封建宗法思想嚴(yán)重、經(jīng)濟(jì)落差導(dǎo)致的心理失衡、貪腐成本和效益比較分析,能腐敗的原因包括“權(quán)力尋租”的現(xiàn)象、村干部擁有極大的尋租權(quán)力、對(duì)村干部的監(jiān)督?jīng)]有落到實(shí)處,敢腐敗的原因包括村民文化素質(zhì)偏低,維權(quán)意識(shí)較差、熟人社會(huì)村民舉報(bào)有顧慮、村民罷免村干部制度存在缺陷、查處基層貪污腐敗力量薄弱等。在此基礎(chǔ)上,論文從“不想腐、不能腐、不敢腐”三個(gè)角度提出了提高思想文化素質(zhì),筑牢思想道德防線、建設(shè)廉政文化,倡導(dǎo)社會(huì)新風(fēng)正氣、提高村干部待遇保障,解決后顧之憂;強(qiáng)化上級(jí)監(jiān)督、加強(qiáng)群眾監(jiān)督、注重同級(jí)監(jiān)督;強(qiáng)化村民維權(quán)意識(shí)和提高維權(quán)能力、完善法律法規(guī)、懲治腐敗不手軟等一系列治理對(duì)策,從而有效遏制農(nóng)村基層“蒼蠅式”腐敗蔓延。
[Abstract]:At present, the number of administrative villages in China is over 680000, and the rural population is about 940 million. Among them, there are about 5 million "village officials", including the secretary of the party branch and the chief of the village. Flies are as rotten as tigers. Village officials are the most direct cognition to the cadre image and the window for the masses to see through the government public trust and the cadre image. The problem of corruption at the grass-roots level in rural areas is a kind of corruption that really enters the eyes of the masses. To the masses, these visible problems of corruption are far more impressive than the corruption of senior officials, and they are also more likely to arouse people's grievances. "fly" corruption must not be ignored, these corruption seriously damaged the image of cadres, resulting in a very bad social impact. In recent years, tens of thousands of corruption cases have been punished at the grass-roots level. If we study them carefully, we will find that each has its own characteristics, and the emphasis is more and more varied, and it has even penetrated into every corner of the mass. From the benefits of subsidies, land removal, policy implementation and other aspects of interception, from bribery, domineering, embezzlement and other forms of corruption. If the corruption of "tiger" is a secret operation with hidden clothes, then "fly corruption" is a simple and straightforward way to fight for profit with the people. Therefore, exploring how to better supervise and manage the village cadres has a profound influence on solving the problem of rural grassroots corruption. Focusing on the important social hot issue of "fly type" corruption in rural areas, taking various typical cases in KZ district in recent years as an example, this paper discusses on the basis of the investigation and field investigation on the cases that I participated in the investigation and handling. Based on the statistics and analysis of the corruption-related data since I was engaged in the investigation and treatment of the case, the paper concludes the concrete characteristics of the village cadres'"fly type" corruption cases. At the same time, through the participation of a series of practical cases elaborated the "village official" corruption affected social stability, damaged the interests of the village collectives and villagers, hindered the development of rural economy, damaged the image of the party and the government, and strongly harmed the social atmosphere; The paper analyzes the reasons of "fly type" corruption from three aspects: thinking of corruption, being able to corrupt and daring to corrupt. The reasons for corruption include the low cultural quality of village cadres. Some village cadres have feudal decadent ideas, money, secular culture and hidden rules prevail, feudal patriarchal ideology is serious, psychological imbalance caused by economic disparity, comparative analysis of corruption costs and benefits. The reasons for corruption include the phenomenon of "power seeking for rent", the village cadres have great power of seeking rent, the supervision of village cadres has not been carried out, and the reasons of daring to corrupt include the low cultural quality of villagers and the poor consciousness of protecting their rights. Acquaintance society villagers report concerns, villagers recall village cadres system defects, corruption and corruption at the grass-roots level weak, and so on. On this basis, from the three angles of "do not want to rot, can't rot, dare not saproot", the paper proposes to improve the ideological and cultural quality, to build a solid ideological and moral defense, to build a clean and honest culture, to advocate a new style of society, and to improve the protection of the treatment of village cadres. To solve the problems at the back; to strengthen supervision by the superior, to strengthen supervision by the masses, to pay attention to supervision at the same level; to strengthen villagers' awareness of safeguarding their rights and to improve their ability to safeguard their rights; to improve laws and regulations; to punish corruption and not to be soft; and so on. Thus effectively curb the rural grassroots "fly" corruption spread.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D262.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟偉;;略論習(xí)近平黨建思想的三個(gè)基本維度[J];特區(qū)實(shí)踐與理論;2016年04期

2 趙秉志;彭新林;;習(xí)近平反腐倡廉思想研究[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

3 趙霞;;傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)村文化的秩序危機(jī)與價(jià)值重建[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村觀察;2011年03期

4 長(zhǎng)子中;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展背景下農(nóng)村社會(huì)穩(wěn)定面臨的問(wèn)題[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年23期

5 陳文芳;劉廣浩;;家族勢(shì)力對(duì)農(nóng)村社會(huì)的影響[J];中共山西省直機(jī)關(guān)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

6 胡躍;;村官腐敗的原因分析及其對(duì)策思考[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè);2010年05期

7 閆國(guó)強(qiáng);;誰(shuí)來(lái)給村官戴上“緊箍咒”[J];村委主任;2010年07期

8 劉文俊;;淺談“村官”職務(wù)犯罪[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年10期

9 高嵩;李波;;淺析當(dāng)前“村官”職務(wù)犯罪的特點(diǎn)、成因及預(yù)防對(duì)策[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年10期

10 郭少華;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)過(guò)程中村官腐敗的社會(huì)學(xué)思考[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1892325