【摘要】：中國(guó)、日本和韓國(guó)這三個(gè)國(guó)家的國(guó)際分工狀況和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變化可以非常形象而準(zhǔn)確的表現(xiàn)出東亞地區(qū)目前的一個(gè)整體狀況,如果能夠很好的把這三個(gè)國(guó)家的國(guó)際分工狀況和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變化進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的研究、總結(jié)和歸納,并加以借鑒和利用,那將會(huì)對(duì)整個(gè)東亞地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展合作都產(chǎn)生非常深遠(yuǎn)的重要意義。中國(guó)、韓國(guó)和日本在最開(kāi)始的東亞地區(qū)的雁行模式中都分別處于三個(gè)不同的階段層次,三國(guó)的優(yōu)劣勢(shì)互不相同,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)也不盡相同,三國(guó)之間在資源和結(jié)構(gòu)方面的互補(bǔ)性都比較明顯,存在著越來(lái)越緊密的經(jīng)貿(mào)合作關(guān)系。近年來(lái)隨著韓國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的騰飛,中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅猛追趕,中日韓三國(guó)之間產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的差距呈現(xiàn)出逐漸縮小的趨勢(shì),越來(lái)越多行業(yè)和產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展都在逐漸的向日本看齊。所以,三個(gè)國(guó)家現(xiàn)在在一些資本密集型和技術(shù)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)上也都形成了相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的形勢(shì)。本文從對(duì)外貿(mào)易的角度,研究了三國(guó)之間商品和貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)以及競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性、互補(bǔ)性和國(guó)際分工地位都發(fā)生了哪些變化。文中采用SITC 0-9標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分類,選取了2004年、2006年、2008年、2010年和2012年五個(gè)年份進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,主要用到了四種重要指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析,首先是運(yùn)用貿(mào)易結(jié)合度指數(shù)進(jìn)行對(duì)比,考察中、日、韓三邊貿(mào)易發(fā)展的具體情況,然后通過(guò)貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)指數(shù)判斷三個(gè)國(guó)家的優(yōu)勢(shì)產(chǎn)業(yè)所在以及各國(guó)的優(yōu)勢(shì)產(chǎn)業(yè)是否重合,同時(shí)還要考察三個(gè)國(guó)家之間的貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性指數(shù),看看三個(gè)國(guó)家之間貿(mào)易關(guān)系的緊密程度。最后在對(duì)三個(gè)國(guó)家分析完了所有的指數(shù)之后,又對(duì)三國(guó)成立自貿(mào)區(qū)進(jìn)行貿(mào)易合作這條道路上會(huì)遇到的困難進(jìn)行了剖析,并給出了相應(yīng)的建議。為什么要選取這四種指標(biāo),原因是他們之間有著緊密相連的關(guān)系。首先從貿(mào)易結(jié)合度這一指標(biāo)了解三個(gè)國(guó)家的貿(mào)易方向,在此基礎(chǔ)上通過(guò)TCD指數(shù)來(lái)看三國(guó)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)比較相似的領(lǐng)域的結(jié)合度是什么樣的,然后再進(jìn)一步的分析三國(guó)TCD值大的領(lǐng)域里哪個(gè)國(guó)家的哪類產(chǎn)品更具有優(yōu)勢(shì),最后利用TCI指數(shù)從另一個(gè)角度查看三國(guó)結(jié)合度高以外的領(lǐng)域里是不是具有互補(bǔ)性,可以進(jìn)行互補(bǔ)。這樣就比較全面。因?yàn)楸疚闹饕粗袊?guó)國(guó)際地位的變化,所以主要研究中日和中韓國(guó)家之間的貿(mào)易關(guān)系及其變化。
[Abstract]:The international division of labor and the changes in the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea can very vividly and accurately represent the current overall situation in East Asia. If the international division of labor and the changes in industrial structure of these three countries can be well studied, summarized and summarized, and used for reference, It will be of great significance to the industrial structure and economic development of the whole East Asia. China, South Korea and Japan are all at three different stages in the initial wild goose travel pattern in East Asia. The advantages and disadvantages of the three countries are different, and the industrial structure is also different. The resources and structure of the three countries are obviously complementary, and there are more and more close economic and trade cooperation relations between the three countries. In recent years, with the rapid development of Korean economy and the rapid catch-up of Chinese economy, the gap between the industrial structure of China, Japan and South Korea has gradually narrowed, and more industries and industries are gradually in line with Japan. As a result, all three countries are now competing with each other in capital-intensive and technological-intensive industries. From the perspective of foreign trade, this paper studies the changes of commodity and trade structure, competitiveness, complementarity and international division of labor among the three countries. This paper adopts SITC 0-9 standard classification, selects 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 five years to carry on the comparative analysis, mainly used four important indicators to carry on the analysis, first is carries on the contrast using the trade union degree index. During the inspection, the specific situation of the trilateral trade development between Japan and South Korea is examined, and then the trade competition index is used to determine whether the superior industries of the three countries are located and whether the superior industries of each country coincide. At the same time, the trade complementarity index among the three countries is also examined. Look at the degree of trade ties between the three countries. Finally, after analyzing all the indexes of the three countries, the paper analyzes the difficulties on the road of establishing free trade area and gives the corresponding suggestions. The reason for choosing these four indicators is that they are closely related. First of all, we understand the trade direction of the three countries from the index of the degree of trade integration. On this basis, through the TCD index, we can see what the degree of integration of the three countries is in the areas where the trade structure is relatively similar. Then further analysis of the three countries in the field of TCD value which country which products have more advantages, finally using the TCI index from another perspective to see whether the three countries outside the high degree of integration is complementary, can be complementary. This is more comprehensive. Because this article mainly looks at the change of China's international status, it mainly studies the trade relations and changes between China, Japan and China and South Korea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F746

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉重力;盛瑋;;中日韓FTA戰(zhàn)略比較研究[J];東北亞論壇;2008年01期

2 盧新德,邵志勤;論中日韓自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的建設(shè)[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2002年12期

3 張威威;;金融動(dòng)蕩背景下的中日韓合作及東亞一體化[J];東南亞縱橫;2009年01期

4 張小濟(jì);符合三國(guó)長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)利益——中日韓構(gòu)筑經(jīng)濟(jì)合作制度框架的選擇[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2003年12期

5 胡鞍鋼;建立中國(guó)、中國(guó)香港特區(qū)、日本、韓國(guó)三國(guó)四方自由貿(mào)易區(qū)設(shè)想[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2001年Z2期

6 陳恒;劉佳;;中韓貿(mào)易產(chǎn)品結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2008年07期

7 陳建安;;中韓日自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定(FTA)的可行性及其經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年01期

8 陳海晶;姚順先;;中日韓FTA的可行性及制約因素分析[J];技術(shù)與市場(chǎng);2008年04期

9 劉昌黎;;中日貿(mào)易的新發(fā)展、新變化及問(wèn)題[J];日本問(wèn)題研究;2011年04期

10 楊偉文;黃圣平;;中日貿(mào)易互補(bǔ)性研究——基于制造業(yè)的實(shí)證分析[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2007年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李建鵬;中日韓自由貿(mào)易區(qū)研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2007年

2 劉闖;中日韓服務(wù)貿(mào)易合作問(wèn)題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2332602