發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-07 19:36

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中的內(nèi)涵能源測(cè)算研究　出處：《北京交通大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 內(nèi)涵能源 投入產(chǎn)出模型 進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易 區(qū)間凈值 平均凈值

【摘要】：隨著世界各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,國(guó)際間進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易范圍也在不斷擴(kuò)大。近年來(lái),中國(guó)能源需求和溫室氣體排放呈現(xiàn)快速增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)。各種形式的“中國(guó)能源威脅論”先后出現(xiàn),因此通過(guò)對(duì)“內(nèi)涵能源”概念的深入研究,并采用投入產(chǎn)出模型對(duì)中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中的內(nèi)涵能源量進(jìn)行測(cè)算,能夠更好地從消費(fèi)側(cè)角度證實(shí)中國(guó)是能源的消耗國(guó),而并非最終的能源產(chǎn)品消費(fèi)國(guó)。 本文從內(nèi)涵能源的概念出發(fā),詳細(xì)整理了現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)中對(duì)內(nèi)涵能源測(cè)算區(qū)域范圍、數(shù)據(jù)來(lái)源及劃分、模型運(yùn)用、誤差來(lái)源、內(nèi)涵能源結(jié)構(gòu)和能源安全評(píng)價(jià)等的差異性。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于借鑒投入產(chǎn)出模型,采用1995年到2009年WIOD提供的世界投入產(chǎn)出表中國(guó)表以及能源消耗總量數(shù)據(jù),將中國(guó)的部門(mén)依照WIOD的國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)劃分為34個(gè)部門(mén)(除去家庭消費(fèi)),整理并測(cè)算出中國(guó)34個(gè)分部門(mén)單邊貿(mào)易進(jìn)出口內(nèi)涵能源量。同時(shí)采用世界銀行提供的中國(guó)、日本、美國(guó)、澳大利亞、韓國(guó)和德國(guó)1995年到2013年的能源消耗總量,以中國(guó)現(xiàn)有的技術(shù)水平測(cè)算出中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中內(nèi)涵能源上限凈值;由于日本的技術(shù)水平處于世界領(lǐng)先位置,本文假設(shè)并測(cè)算出以日本直接消耗系數(shù)和能耗強(qiáng)度代替的中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中內(nèi)涵能源下限凈值。同時(shí)測(cè)算出中國(guó)同其他五個(gè)國(guó)家進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中內(nèi)涵能源平均凈值。本文引入進(jìn)出口系數(shù)對(duì)模型進(jìn)行修正,在較大程度上降低了測(cè)算誤差。 研究結(jié)果表明,從1995年到2009年中國(guó)分部門(mén)進(jìn)出口能源強(qiáng)度和1995年到2013年中國(guó)各年份進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易能源強(qiáng)度的測(cè)算結(jié)果對(duì)比中可以發(fā)現(xiàn),中國(guó)整體的能源強(qiáng)度都遠(yuǎn)高于日本、美國(guó)等國(guó)家的4-13倍左右,并且中國(guó)主要能源部門(mén)消耗的內(nèi)涵能源量極高,2009年中國(guó)單邊貿(mào)易進(jìn)出口內(nèi)涵能源凈值排在前三位的部門(mén)為電氣、燃?xì)夂退⿷?yīng)業(yè),精煉石油和核燃料業(yè),以及基本金屬和金屬業(yè)。這三個(gè)高度能源消耗部門(mén)的內(nèi)涵能源量占中國(guó)34個(gè)部門(mén)總內(nèi)涵能源量的44.11%,同時(shí)中國(guó)進(jìn)出口內(nèi)涵能源總量上升明顯。從1995年到2013年中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中內(nèi)涵能源區(qū)間凈值測(cè)算結(jié)果中可以發(fā)現(xiàn),中國(guó)進(jìn)出口內(nèi)涵能源上下限凈值的差距非常大。受到美國(guó)、日本、澳大利亞、德國(guó)和韓國(guó)五個(gè)國(guó)家較低的直接消耗系數(shù)和能源強(qiáng)度的影響,測(cè)算出的中國(guó)進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易中內(nèi)涵能源平均凈值處于一個(gè)較低的水平并且增長(zhǎng)趨勢(shì)緩慢,這個(gè)測(cè)算結(jié)果應(yīng)屬于合理的范圍。結(jié)果證實(shí)中國(guó)是內(nèi)涵能源凈出口國(guó)家。最后,本文提出相應(yīng)的應(yīng)對(duì)措施和政策建議,鼓勵(lì)新能源的開(kāi)發(fā)與利用,并且從政府和公民的角度提出相應(yīng)的改善措施。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of the world economy and the international import and export trade is also expanding. In recent years, China demand for energy and greenhouse gas emissions showed a rapid growth trend. The various forms of "Chinese energy threat" has appeared, therefore through in-depth study of the connotation of "energy" concept, and the connotation of input-output model the amount of energy in the import and export trade China estimates, can better from the perspective of the consumer side is confirmed Chinese energy consumption country, but not the final consumption of energy products in China.
This article from the concept of energy, with the connotation of the finishing energy estimates range of existing literature, data sources and classification, model application, error sources, differences in the connotation of energy structure and energy safety evaluation. The innovation of this paper lies in using the input-output model, using 1995 to 2009 WIOD world input-output table China table and total energy consumption data, the Chinese department in accordance with the division of the international standard WIOD 34 sector (excluding household consumption), and calculate the China finishing 34 Department of unilateral trade import and export volume. At the same time the content of energy provided by the world bank Chinese, Japan, America, Australia, South Korea and Germany in 1995 by 2013 the total energy consumption, to China existing technology level estimates of the Chinese import and export trade of energy embodied in the upper limit of the net; the technical level In the leading position in the world, this assumption and calculate the coefficient and energy intensity China instead of import and export trade of energy embodied in the lower net direct consumption in Japan. At the same time to calculate the Chinese with five other countries import and export trade in average net energy. This paper introduces the connotation of the import and export coefficient model was modified, greatly reduced the calculation error.
The results show that from 1995 to 2009 China Branch Import and export of energy intensity and calculation results of each year from 1995 to China import and export trade of energy intensity contrast can be found in 2013, the overall energy intensity China are much higher than Japan, the United States and other countries 4-13 times the left and right amount of energy and high China connotation of major energy consuming sectors in 2009, China unilateral trade import and export of embodied energy net ranked the top three in the Department of electrical, gas and water supply industry, petroleum refining and nuclear fuel industry, as well as the basic metals and metal industry. The three departments of the high energy consumption accounted for 34 of the energy content of China total amount of energy content of the 44.11% department at the same time, the connotation of China import and export total energy increased significantly. From 1995 to 2013 China import and export trade of energy embodied in the range of the net results can be found in the import and export Chinese connotation On the lower limit of the net value of the energy gap is very big. By the United States, Japan, Australia, influence of direct consumption coefficient and energy intensity in Germany and South Korea in the lower five states, estimates of the import and export trade Chinese connotation of average net energy is at a low level and slow growth trend, this result should belong to the scope of the results show that Chinese is reasonable. The connotation of net energy export countries. Finally, put forward corresponding measures and policy proposals in this paper, the development and utilization of new energy to encourage, and put forward the corresponding improvement measures from the government and the citizen's point of view.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F752.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張紀(jì)錄;;中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的隱含碳排放研究——基于改進(jìn)的投入產(chǎn)出模型[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年07期

2 蘭宜生;寧學(xué)敏;;我國(guó)出口擴(kuò)大與能源消耗的一項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年01期

3 閆云鳳;趙忠秀;王苒;;中歐貿(mào)易隱含碳及政策啟示——基于投入產(chǎn)出模型的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2012年02期

4 劉強(qiáng);莊幸;姜克雋;韓文科;;中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易中的載能量及碳排放量分析[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年08期

5 周勤;趙靜;盛巧燕;;中國(guó)能源補(bǔ)貼政策形成和出口產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的關(guān)系研究[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年03期

6 王潔華;;中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的隱含國(guó)內(nèi)能源分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2011年08期

7 郁義鴻;花冇;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易內(nèi)涵能源結(jié)構(gòu)及其政策含義——以中美商品貿(mào)易為例[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年11期

8 陳紅蕾;翟婷婷;;中澳貿(mào)易隱含碳排放的測(cè)算及失衡度分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2013年07期

9 趙玉煥;田揚(yáng);劉婭;;基于投入產(chǎn)出分析的印度對(duì)外貿(mào)易隱含碳研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2014年10期

10 黃敏;蔣琴兒;;外貿(mào)中隱含碳的計(jì)算及其變化的因素分解[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1393970