發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-22 12:05

【摘要】：《禁止化學(xué)武器公約》生效16年來，國(guó)際禁化武履約工作進(jìn)展順利，我國(guó)履約事業(yè)也成效顯著，企業(yè)按時(shí)進(jìn)行各類數(shù)據(jù)宣布，通過民用工業(yè)國(guó)際核查260多次，還未曾有企業(yè)出現(xiàn)重大違規(guī)現(xiàn)象。但是，國(guó)際禁化武組織工作重點(diǎn)正由裁軍向工業(yè)設(shè)施監(jiān)控轉(zhuǎn)移，國(guó)際核查頻次在增多，力度在加大，監(jiān)控方法也開始多樣化，我市工業(yè)履約任務(wù)將更加艱巨。而同時(shí)天津市的禁化武企業(yè)多數(shù)為中小化工企業(yè)，位置偏僻，管理粗放，人員素質(zhì)不高，各區(qū)縣政府禁化武管理人員也多為兼職，難以全力以赴，并且專業(yè)技能不足，企業(yè)存在很大的監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 本文首先分析天津市禁化武企業(yè)管理現(xiàn)狀和存在的缺陷，思考企業(yè)監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)存在并逐漸加大的原因，并得出企業(yè)潛在的違規(guī)種類，然后分析禁化武企業(yè)監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響要素及其指標(biāo)，并進(jìn)行梳理分類，接著分析風(fēng)險(xiǎn)影響指標(biāo)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估之間的關(guān)系，并利用專家評(píng)價(jià)和層次分析法相結(jié)合的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)方法，建立風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估模型，評(píng)估企業(yè)監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)大小，并以天津市某企業(yè)為例，利用建立的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估模型來評(píng)估其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)大小，判定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等級(jí)，最后思考如何根據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估的結(jié)果來降低企業(yè)監(jiān)管的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 本文通過對(duì)天津市禁化武企業(yè)的履約現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行研究，評(píng)估其監(jiān)管的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)按大小劃分等級(jí)，，對(duì)不同風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等級(jí)的企業(yè)采取有針對(duì)性的監(jiān)管策略，規(guī)范其履約行為，防范企業(yè)違規(guī)，以確保天津市履約事業(yè)順利進(jìn)行，同時(shí)也對(duì)指導(dǎo)我國(guó)其它省市的履約工作起到借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:Since the entry into force of the Chemical weapons Convention (CWC) 16 years ago, the implementation of the CWC has been progressing smoothly, and China's performance has also achieved remarkable results. Enterprises have made timely announcements of all kinds of data, and have passed more than 260 international verification by civil industries. There have not been any major violations of the law. However, the focus of OPCW work is shifting from disarmament to industrial facilities monitoring, the frequency of international verification is increasing, the intensity is increasing, the monitoring methods are beginning to diversify, and the task of industrial performance in our city will be even more arduous. At the same time, most of the chemical ban enterprises in Tianjin are small and medium-sized chemical enterprises, which are located in remote areas, have extensive management, and do not have high quality personnel. The administrative personnel of the governments of all districts and counties are also part-time, so it is difficult to go all out and have insufficient professional skills. Enterprises have great regulatory risks. This paper first analyzes the present situation and defects of the management of the chemical weapons proscribed enterprises in Tianjin, thinks about the reasons for the existence and gradual increase of the risk of enterprise supervision, and obtains the types of potential violations by the enterprises. Then it analyzes the influencing factors and indexes of the supervision risk of the chemical weapons enterprises, and classifies them, then analyzes the relationship between the risk impact indicators and the risk assessment, and makes use of the risk evaluation method which combines expert evaluation and AHP, and analyzes the relationship between the risk impact indicators and the risk assessment. A risk assessment model is established to evaluate the risk of enterprise supervision. Taking an enterprise in Tianjin as an example, the established risk assessment model is used to evaluate the risk and determine the risk grade. Finally, we consider how to reduce the risk of enterprise supervision according to the results of risk assessment. Based on the study of the status quo of the implementation of the CWW enterprises in Tianjin, this paper assesses the risk of supervision, classifies the risk according to its size, and adopts targeted supervision strategies to regulate the performance behavior of the enterprises with different risk levels. In order to ensure the smooth implementation of Tianjin, it is helpful to guide other provinces and cities in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F426.72

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 林敏娟;;公共政策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估研究:局限與突破[J];理論與改革;2015年02期

2 朱正威;石佳;劉瑩瑩;;政策過程視野下重大公共政策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估及其關(guān)鍵因素識(shí)別[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2015年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉海濱;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估視角下師范生免費(fèi)教育政策研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 羅明;南昌市現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2013年

2 陳愛敏;重大行政決策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

3 周炳坤;地方政府高層次人才政策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其規(guī)避研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

4 楊光鳳;地方政府新型農(nóng)村養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)政策執(zhí)行研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2013年

5 梁娜;地方政府重大行政決策評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

6 鄒祥生;政策網(wǎng)絡(luò)視角下景區(qū)收費(fèi)的政策沖突研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

7 沈韻;鄰避沖突的社會(huì)穩(wěn)定風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];南京大學(xué);2015年

本文編號(hào)：2287108