中興通訊股權(quán)激勵方案設(shè)計研究
[Abstract]:In corporate governance, equity incentive is a more important system. By allowing managers to hold a certain number of stocks, equity incentives make the interests of management and shareholders converge, thus easing the conflicts of interest between the principal and the agent. Foreign countries have carried out equity incentive for decades, but the time of introducing equity incentive in our country is not long. The first normative equity incentive scheme was implemented by Vanke in 1997. With the formal introduction of the "measures for Stock incentive Management of listed companies (trial)", the incentive system of equity incentive has been adopted by many enterprises in China, but in general, because of the imperfect capital market, The governance environment of listed companies is also generally poor, the implementation effect is not very successful. ZTE is the early implementation of equity incentives of the state-owned listed companies. Although its equity incentive plan is relatively complete, the program design and implementation procedures are also more standardized, at the same time in the core knowledge of staff incentives and the introduction of personal performance indicators and other aspects of certain characteristics and reference significance. But there are still many problems that need to be improved. This paper adopts the method of combining literature research with theoretical research, selects ZTE's equity incentive plan as the main research object, and analyzes the performance of ZTE before and after the implementation of the scheme. Find out the problems in the design of the equity incentive scheme, and through the analysis of the scheme itself, find out the root of the problem, on the basis of summing up the existing problems of the equity incentive scheme of ZTE, improve the design of the equity incentive scheme. The research found that ZTE's equity incentive plan did not play its due role, and the company's performance did not improve qualitatively. The equity incentive scheme itself has some problems, such as inappropriate incentive mode, excessive intensity, lack of fairness, single exercise index, unreasonable price determination and so on. Based on this, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the design of ZTE's equity incentive scheme from the aspects of mode selection, object selection, stock and fund source, price determination, quantity arrangement, time arrangement, mechanism arrangement, exercise condition, etc. And on this basis, put forward to improve the implementation of China's equity incentive plan policy advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:F272.92;F275;F426.63
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張宗益,宋增基;上市公司經(jīng)理持股與公司績效實證研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期
2 徐文新;我國上市公司股權(quán)激勵方式的分類比較研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2003年S1期
3 潘穎;劉廣生;;雙重委托治理框架下股權(quán)激勵效應(yīng)研究[J];經(jīng)濟經(jīng)緯;2009年06期
4 劉國亮,王加勝;上市公司股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)、激勵制度及績效的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟理論與經(jīng)濟管理;2000年05期
5 張維迎,吳有昌 ,馬捷;公有制經(jīng)濟中的委托人—代理人關(guān)系:理論分析和政策含義[J];經(jīng)濟研究;1995年04期
6 魏剛;高級管理層激勵與上市公司經(jīng)營績效[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2000年03期
7 周建波,孫菊生;經(jīng)營者股權(quán)激勵的治理效應(yīng)研究——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2003年05期
8 周璐;;高管人員股權(quán)激勵與公司業(yè)績的實證分析[J];內(nèi)江科技;2006年05期
9 李增泉;激勵機制與企業(yè)績效——一項基于上市公司的實證研究[J];會計研究;2000年01期
10 張俊瑞 ,趙進文 ,張建;高級管理層激勵與上市公司經(jīng)營績效相關(guān)性的實證分析[J];會計研究;2003年09期
,本文編號:2283233
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/gongyejingjilunwen/2283233.html