本文選題：風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目 + 財務(wù)評價方法��； 參考：《南京航空航天大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著風(fēng)力發(fā)電項目的不斷增加，自然能源的充分利用，越來越多的投資者出資支持風(fēng)力發(fā)電的發(fā)展，同時，國家也制定很多政策鼓勵投資者們加入到風(fēng)電行業(yè)中來。那么就有必要對風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目前期進(jìn)行財務(wù)可行性研究，這個不僅對投資者們制定投資決策、保證風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目運(yùn)營經(jīng)濟(jì)效益具有重大的實踐意義，也對保證電能的供給，保持經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定的發(fā)展趨勢具有重要的戰(zhàn)略意義。 本文針對當(dāng)前風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系與評價方法的應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀及不足，經(jīng)過對風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目費(fèi)用與效益的估算，風(fēng)電項目的建設(shè)能力、盈利能力與償債能力等財務(wù)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析與改進(jìn)，構(gòu)建了適用于風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目的財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系與財務(wù)評價模型。同時，本文還將發(fā)展能力因素與營運(yùn)能力因素考慮到財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系中，，并且將風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目分成建設(shè)期與經(jīng)營期兩個階段來進(jìn)行綜合評價，克服了傳統(tǒng)的財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系不全面，財務(wù)評價方法過于簡便的弊端，不論在理論假設(shè)上還是在實際應(yīng)用中，該計算結(jié)果都很合理，更具有參考價值。本文還構(gòu)建了風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目基于層次分析法的模糊評價模型。最終，在實例分析中，本文將改善前的財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系、評價方法與改善后的財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)應(yīng)用于風(fēng)力發(fā)電財務(wù)評價模型中的結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較，結(jié)果表明，改善后的財務(wù)評價方法模型與指標(biāo)體系對風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目進(jìn)行了更加準(zhǔn)確的財務(wù)評估，并且可以證明本文建立的改善后的財務(wù)模糊評價模型具有很好的可操作性。 在風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目前期進(jìn)行財務(wù)可行性評價，可以有效地減少風(fēng)力發(fā)電項目的盲目投資與項目投資失誤。本文提出的風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系與基于層次分析法的模糊評價模型，對開展風(fēng)力發(fā)電投資項目前期財務(wù)評價工作具有一定的借鑒與指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:With the increasing number of wind power projects and the full use of natural energy, more and more investors support the development of wind power generation. At the same time, the state has formulated many policies to encourage investors to join the wind power industry. Then it is necessary to carry out a financial feasibility study in the early stage of the wind power investment project, which is not only of great practical significance to investors in making investment decisions and ensuring the operational economic benefits of wind power investment projects. It is also of strategic significance to ensure the supply of electric energy and maintain the development trend of economic stability. In view of the current situation and deficiency of the financial evaluation index system and evaluation method of wind power investment project, the paper estimates the cost and benefit of wind power investment project and the construction ability of wind power project. Based on the analysis and improvement of financial indexes such as profitability and solvency, a financial evaluation index system and a financial evaluation model for wind power investment projects are constructed. At the same time, this paper also takes the development ability factor and the operation ability factor into account in the financial evaluation index system, and divides the wind power investment project into two stages: the construction period and the operation period to carry on the comprehensive evaluation. It overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional financial evaluation index system which is not comprehensive and the financial evaluation method is too simple. The calculation results are reasonable and have reference value in both theoretical assumptions and practical applications. The fuzzy evaluation model of wind power investment project based on AHP is also constructed in this paper. Finally, in the example analysis, the paper compares the financial evaluation index system, the evaluation method and the improved financial evaluation index with the results in the wind power generation financial evaluation model, the results show that, The improved financial evaluation method model and index system are more accurate financial evaluation of wind power investment projects, and it can be proved that the improved financial fuzzy evaluation model established in this paper has good maneuverability. In the early stage of wind power investment project, the financial feasibility evaluation can effectively reduce the blind investment and project investment errors of wind power generation project. The financial evaluation index system of wind power investment project and the fuzzy evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) proposed in this paper have certain reference and guidance significance for the financial evaluation work of wind power investment project.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京航空航天大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F406.7;F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范光羽;劉彩華;王婷;;農(nóng)業(yè)投資項目財務(wù)評價指標(biāo)體系研究[J];財會通訊;2009年05期

2 包耳;胡紅英;;風(fēng)力發(fā)電的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r與展望[J];大連民族學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年01期

3 詹平原;;風(fēng)電項目財務(wù)評價方法及應(yīng)用研究[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2011年06期

4 宋來弟;張永昭;曹印鋒;;風(fēng)、光互補(bǔ)供電系統(tǒng)在燃?xì)庹{(diào)壓站/箱上的應(yīng)用[J];城市燃?xì)?2012年12期

5 劉雅麗;;內(nèi)部收益率與投資利潤率指標(biāo)關(guān)系探討[J];財會月刊;2010年32期

6 曾鳴;劉萬福;未瑞;沈又幸;;風(fēng)力發(fā)電可行性評價指標(biāo)體系及方法研究[J];華東電力;2008年08期

7 沈又幸;劉琳;曾鳴;;風(fēng)電社會效益的評價模型及其應(yīng)用研究[J];華東電力;2009年05期

8 趙群;王永泉;李輝;;世界風(fēng)力發(fā)電現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢[J];機(jī)電工程;2006年12期

9 廖紅強(qiáng);邱勇;楊俠;王星剛;葛任偉;;對應(yīng)用層次分析法確定權(quán)重系數(shù)的探討[J];機(jī)械工程師;2012年06期

10 劉文琦;熊惠珍;;層次分析法在財務(wù)指標(biāo)分析中的應(yīng)用[J];審計與理財;2010年01期

本文編號：1897622