本文選題：可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)　切入點(diǎn)：應(yīng)對(duì)策略　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)事件時(shí)有發(fā)生,而其中很大一部分是可辯解的產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)。在面對(duì)可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)事件時(shí),企業(yè)采取何種策略才能最大程度上維持消費(fèi)者的購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿?本文基于這一問(wèn)題展開(kāi)了相關(guān)的研究。本文從維持消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿的角度出發(fā),對(duì)不同情境下可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)策略效果進(jìn)行分析。 為了深入地研究這一問(wèn)題,本文在確定研究?jī)?nèi)容后,首先對(duì)該問(wèn)題的背景作相關(guān)敘述,接著簡(jiǎn)要地梳理了國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者在產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)領(lǐng)域的研究情況。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文以企業(yè)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略為自變量(辯解策略、緘默策略和和解策略),消費(fèi)者角購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿為因變量,危機(jī)的嚴(yán)重性和危機(jī)的群發(fā)屬性作為調(diào)節(jié)變量,并提出相關(guān)假設(shè)。 本文共提出了6個(gè)假設(shè),發(fā)放了420份問(wèn)卷,其中有效問(wèn)卷372份。采用了SPSS18.0對(duì)問(wèn)卷數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,包括描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、因子分析和一階方差分析等。通過(guò)分析,6個(gè)假設(shè)都得到了完全證明或部分證明。 實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明：企業(yè)在應(yīng)對(duì)不同情境下的可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)時(shí),并不存在一個(gè)普適的應(yīng)對(duì)策略,不同情境下不同的應(yīng)對(duì)策略效果會(huì)有著很大的不同。就維持消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿角度而言,緘默的策略肯定不會(huì)是最優(yōu)的策略。企業(yè)在應(yīng)對(duì)嚴(yán)重且單發(fā)的危機(jī)時(shí)辯解的策略是最有效的。危機(jī)的嚴(yán)重性和群發(fā)屬性對(duì)企業(yè)策略選擇的效果存在調(diào)節(jié)作用。隨著危機(jī)的嚴(yán)重性減弱,辯解策略的效果越差而和解策略的效果越優(yōu)；同樣,隨著群發(fā)屬性的增加,辯解策略的效果越差而和解策略的效果越優(yōu)。本文也間接證明了危機(jī)嚴(yán)重性的調(diào)節(jié)作用強(qiáng)于危機(jī)群發(fā)屬性的調(diào)節(jié)作用。 與以往研究相比,本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于證明了企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)時(shí)并不存在一個(gè)普適的策略。危機(jī)的嚴(yán)重性和群發(fā)屬性會(huì)對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)策略的效果產(chǎn)生影響。根據(jù)研究得出的結(jié)論,本文為企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)可辯解產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)提供了一個(gè)新的思路,建議企業(yè)在處理危機(jī)事件的時(shí)候結(jié)合危機(jī)的嚴(yán)重性和危機(jī)的群發(fā)屬性,做出相應(yīng)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略選擇。
[Abstract]:In recent years, product injury crisis has occurred from time to time, and a large part of it is a product injury crisis that can be justified.In the face of a crisis of justifiable product injury, what strategies can companies adopt to maximize consumer willingness to buy?Based on this problem, this paper carries out related research.From the point of view of maintaining consumers' willingness to buy, this paper analyzes the effects of crisis strategies in defensible products under different circumstances.In order to study this problem deeply, this paper firstly narrates the background of the problem, and then briefly combs the research situation of domestic and foreign scholars in the field of product injury crisis.On this basis, this paper takes the enterprise's coping strategy as the independent variable (defense strategy, silence strategy and settlement strategy), consumer desire to buy as dependent variable, the severity of the crisis and the crisis attributes as adjustment variables.And put forward related hypotheses.In this paper, we put forward 6 hypotheses and issued 420 questionnaires, of which 372 were valid.SPSS18.0 was used to analyze the questionnaire data, including descriptive statistical analysis, factor analysis and first order ANOVA.Through analysis, all the six hypotheses are fully proved or partially proved.The experimental results show that there is no universal coping strategy when enterprises deal with the crisis of defensible product injury in different situations, and the effects of different coping strategies will be very different in different situations.In terms of maintaining consumers' willingness to buy, silence is certainly not the best strategy.A firm's strategy to defend itself against a serious and isolated crisis is the most effective.The severity of the crisis and the attributes of group hair have a moderating effect on the choice of enterprise strategy.As the severity of the crisis weakens, the worse the effect of the defense strategy is, the better the effect of the settlement strategy is; similarly, the worse the effect of the defense strategy is, the better the effect of the reconciliation strategy is with the increase of the attributes of the group hair.This paper also indirectly proves that the regulatory effect of crisis severity is stronger than that of crisis group.Compared with the previous studies, the innovation of this paper is to prove that there is no universal strategy for enterprises to deal with the crisis of injury of defensible products.The severity of the crisis and the nature of mass hair will have an impact on the effectiveness of response strategies.According to the conclusions of the study, this paper provides a new way for enterprises to deal with the crisis of defensible products, and suggests that enterprises should combine the severity of the crisis and the attributes of the crisis when dealing with the crisis.Make the corresponding strategy choice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F272.3;F416.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 寧昌會(huì);基于消費(fèi)者效用的品牌權(quán)益模型及應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年10期

2 王曉玉;晁鋼令;吳紀(jì)元;;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)響應(yīng)方式與消費(fèi)者考慮集變動(dòng)——跨產(chǎn)品類(lèi)別的比較[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年07期

3 韋桂華;三株為何枯萎——由三株官司看品牌的危機(jī)管理[J];管理科學(xué)文摘;2001年02期

4 王曉玉;晁鋼令;吳紀(jì)元;;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)及其處理過(guò)程對(duì)消費(fèi)者考慮集的影響[J];管理世界;2006年05期

5 方正;江明華;楊洋;李蔚;;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)策略對(duì)品牌資產(chǎn)的影響研究——企業(yè)聲譽(yù)與危機(jī)類(lèi)型的調(diào)節(jié)作用[J];管理世界;2010年12期

6 戴鑫;荊美星;鄧雪芬;田志龍;;企業(yè)危機(jī)情境下的合法性策略及其效應(yīng)研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年10期

7 段桂敏;余偉萍;;過(guò)失型、蓄意型產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)對(duì)品牌組合購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿影響研究——消費(fèi)者負(fù)面情感的中介作用[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2012年02期

8 王麗麗;呂巍;練叔凡;;基于品牌忠誠(chéng)度的產(chǎn)品危機(jī)中責(zé)任歸因影響研究[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2009年05期

9 井淼;周穎;王方華;;產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)對(duì)品牌資產(chǎn)影響的實(shí)證研究[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2009年06期

10 汪興東;景奉杰;;產(chǎn)品傷害中網(wǎng)絡(luò)與企業(yè)響應(yīng)對(duì)購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿的影響[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2011年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李玉萍;可辯解型產(chǎn)品傷害危機(jī)應(yīng)對(duì)方式對(duì)顧客購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿的影響研究[D];重慶工商大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1703520