本文選題：制造業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移　出處：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,區(qū)域間的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距逐漸明顯。東部地區(qū)依托著優(yōu)越的地理位置和開放的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策,實(shí)現(xiàn)了勞動(dòng)力和產(chǎn)業(yè)的快速集聚。中部和西部由于多年受“政策”的冷落,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展緩慢,產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚性不強(qiáng)。但近幾年,隨著東部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展,生產(chǎn)成本不斷升高,落后的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)已不能適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的要求。同時(shí),中西部地區(qū)由于產(chǎn)業(yè)“缺位”,經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展動(dòng)力不強(qiáng),亟需轉(zhuǎn)入產(chǎn)業(yè)為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展注入活力。為此,通過制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移,釋放東部地區(qū)的邊緣性產(chǎn)業(yè),增強(qiáng)中西部地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)集中水平,成為協(xié)調(diào)東中西發(fā)展的有效措施。基于此,本文首先對(duì)國內(nèi)外有關(guān)制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移的研究文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行回顧和評(píng)述。在此基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移進(jìn)行宏觀到微觀的理論研究。根據(jù)新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)理論,著重分析制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移微觀動(dòng)力機(jī)制。然后對(duì)我國制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,并著重分析江蘇省南北地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移、廣東省產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移、重慶承接沿海產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移和皖江城市帶產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移四個(gè)地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移情況。通過分析表明,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的形式主要通過跨區(qū)域投資來實(shí)現(xiàn),通過共建產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)實(shí)來現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)的承接,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)承接地的經(jīng)濟(jì)拉動(dòng)效果顯著。同時(shí)本文還從產(chǎn)業(yè)配套能力、政策導(dǎo)向、運(yùn)輸成本、環(huán)境保護(hù)四個(gè)方面對(duì)制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移所存在的問題進(jìn)行總結(jié)分析。分析表明,我國制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移存在著產(chǎn)業(yè)承接地配套能力不足,市場(chǎng)機(jī)制不健全,政府干預(yù)過多,運(yùn)輸成本高,承接地環(huán)境污染嚴(yán)重等問題。為進(jìn)一步研究我國制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移的現(xiàn)狀。本文基于偏離一份額分析的思想,通過定義區(qū)域偏離分量和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)分量,并以28個(gè)制造業(yè)產(chǎn)值增加值為變量,對(duì)2006—2011年中國八大區(qū)域間產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移進(jìn)行定量測(cè)度。研究表明,2006～2011年期間,我國制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的總體趨勢(shì)是以中西部地區(qū)相近梯度間擴(kuò)散式轉(zhuǎn)移為主,以沿海地區(qū)集聚式轉(zhuǎn)移為輔。東部和北部沿海區(qū)域的制造業(yè)發(fā)展已經(jīng)減緩,中部和西部已經(jīng)成為制造業(yè)集中發(fā)展的主要區(qū)域。從總體趨勢(shì)來看,制造業(yè)已經(jīng)向中西部地區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)移,但是全國大范圍的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移并沒有出現(xiàn)。接著本文根據(jù)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移定量測(cè)度的結(jié)果,選取九個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)移明顯的產(chǎn)業(yè),通過構(gòu)建面板數(shù)據(jù)模型,對(duì)影響產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的因素進(jìn)行回歸分析。結(jié)果表明,勞動(dòng)密集度、資金密集度、技術(shù)密集度和交通密集度對(duì)于制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移具有明顯的推動(dòng)作用。最后,本文從完善中西部投資環(huán)境,改善交通運(yùn)輸條件,提高承接地勞動(dòng)力素質(zhì)、降低人力資本轉(zhuǎn)移粘性,科學(xué)引導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)布局四個(gè)方面對(duì)促進(jìn)制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移提出具體的政策建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the economy, the gap of economic development between regions is gradually obvious. The eastern region is relying on its superior geographical position and open economic policies. The central and western regions have been neglected for many years by "policies", economic development is slow, and industrial agglomeration is not strong. But in recent years, with the rapid economic development of the eastern region, the production costs have been rising. The backward industrial structure can no longer meet the requirements of economic development. At the same time, due to the absence of industry and the lack of impetus for economic development in the central and western regions, there is an urgent need to turn to industry to inject vitality into economic development. The release of marginal industries in the eastern region and the enhancement of the level of industrial concentration in the central and western regions have become effective measures to coordinate the development of the East and the West. In this paper, firstly, the domestic and foreign literatures on regional transfer of manufacturing industry are reviewed and reviewed. On the basis of this, the theory of regional transfer of manufacturing industry is studied from macro to micro. According to the theory of new economic geography, The micro dynamic mechanism of regional transfer of manufacturing industry is emphatically analyzed. Then, the present situation of regional transfer of manufacturing industry in China is analyzed, and the industrial transfer in the north and south of Jiangsu Province and in Guangdong Province is also analyzed. Through the analysis, it is shown that the form of industrial transfer is mainly realized through cross-regional investment, and the industrial transfer is realized through the co-construction of industrial parks. At the same time, the paper summarizes and analyzes the problems existing in the regional transfer of manufacturing industry from four aspects: industry supporting ability, policy direction, transportation cost and environmental protection. The regional transfer of manufacturing industry in our country has the following problems: insufficient supporting capacity of industry to undertake, imperfect market mechanism, excessive government intervention and high transportation cost. In order to further study the current situation of regional transfer of manufacturing industry in China, based on the idea of deviation one share analysis, this paper defines the regional deviation component and industrial structure component by the definition of regional deviation component and industrial structure component. Taking the value added of 28 manufacturing industries as variables, the paper measures the industrial transfer among eight regions in China from 2006 to 2011. The results show that: from 2006 to 2011, The general trend of the transfer of manufacturing industry in China is dominated by the similar gradient diffusion transfer in the central and western regions, supplemented by the agglomeration transfer of the coastal areas. The development of manufacturing industry in the eastern and northern coastal regions has slowed down. The central and western regions have become the main areas of concentrated development of the manufacturing industry. Judging from the overall trend, the manufacturing industry has shifted to the central and western regions. However, there is no large-scale industrial transfer in China. Then, according to the results of quantitative measurement of industrial transfer, this paper selects nine industries with obvious transfer, and constructs panel data model. Regression analysis of the factors affecting industrial transfer shows that labor intensity, capital intensity, technology intensity and traffic intensity have a significant impact on the transfer of manufacturing regions. This paper puts forward concrete policy suggestions on promoting the regional transfer of manufacturing industry from four aspects: perfecting the investment environment of the central and western regions, improving the transportation conditions, improving the quality of the labor force in the place of undertaking, reducing the stickiness of the transfer of human capital, and scientifically guiding the industrial layout.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F424

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃順魁;王裕瑾;張可云;;中國制造業(yè)八大區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移分析——基于偏離—份額分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2013年12期

2 鄧新波;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚與中國制造業(yè)區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移——基于新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)分析[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2013年12期

3 吳愛芝;孫鐵山;李國平;;中國紡織服裝產(chǎn)業(yè)的空間集聚與區(qū)域轉(zhuǎn)移[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

4 黃順魁;劉瓊;;中國制造業(yè)就業(yè)的空間偏離—份額分析[J];產(chǎn)經(jīng)評(píng)論;2013年02期

5 覃成林;熊雪如;;我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移動(dòng)態(tài)演變及特征分析——基于相對(duì)凈流量指標(biāo)的測(cè)度[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年01期

6 孟德友;陸玉麒;;中部省區(qū)制造業(yè)區(qū)域?qū)I(yè)化分工與競(jìng)合關(guān)系演進(jìn)[J];地理科學(xué);2012年08期

7 沈驚宏;孟德友;陸玉麒;;皖江城市帶承接長(zhǎng)三角產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的空間差異分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2012年03期

8 李穎;楊慧敏;劉乃全;;新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理視角下產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的動(dòng)力機(jī)制——以紡織業(yè)為例的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2012年03期

9 楊林濤;;多視角分析下的中國制造業(yè)不均衡格局[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2012年01期

10 劉紅光;劉衛(wèi)東;劉志高;;區(qū)域間產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移定量測(cè)度研究——基于區(qū)域間投入產(chǎn)出表分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1610707