本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)政策　切入點(diǎn)：企業(yè)創(chuàng)新　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)80年代末,我國開始推行的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策是中國改革開放三十年來經(jīng)濟(jì)迅猛增長奇跡的重要原因之一。然而,隨著時(shí)間的推移,特別是中共十八大以來,選擇性產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的弊端開始顯現(xiàn)出來,特別是其手段激進(jìn)、政府干預(yù)替代市場(chǎng)選擇、以地方保護(hù)抑制市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭、通過兼并新興中小企業(yè)來發(fā)展大型企業(yè)、追求高速增長導(dǎo)致部分行業(yè)產(chǎn)能過剩等特征與當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展進(jìn)入新常態(tài),亟需謀求產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的新時(shí)期新階段不相適應(yīng)。本文分析中國產(chǎn)業(yè)政策對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新行為的影響及其內(nèi)部機(jī)理。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),受產(chǎn)業(yè)政策激勵(lì)的公司,專利申請(qǐng)顯著增加,但只是非發(fā)明專利顯著增加,追求“數(shù)量”而忽略“質(zhì)量”;當(dāng)公司預(yù)期將獲得更多的政府補(bǔ)貼和稅收優(yōu)惠時(shí),其專利申請(qǐng)、特別是非發(fā)明專利申請(qǐng)顯著增加,選擇性產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的財(cái)稅手段使企業(yè)為“尋扶持”而創(chuàng)新。進(jìn)一步對(duì)企業(yè)分組分析發(fā)現(xiàn),上述現(xiàn)象只在國企組、非高新技術(shù)行業(yè)組中顯著。這說明選擇性產(chǎn)業(yè)政策只激勵(lì)企業(yè)策略性創(chuàng)新,企業(yè)為“尋扶持”而增加創(chuàng)新“數(shù)量”,創(chuàng)新“質(zhì)量”并沒有顯著提高。然而,發(fā)明專利申請(qǐng)的增加才能提高企業(yè)的市場(chǎng)價(jià)值,推動(dòng)技術(shù)進(jìn)步和獲取競(jìng)爭優(yōu)勢(shì)的實(shí)質(zhì)性創(chuàng)新才能促進(jìn)企業(yè)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:At the end of 1980s, the industrial policy that our country began to carry out is one of the important reasons for the rapid economic growth miracle in the 30 years of reform and opening up in China. However, with the passage of time, especially since the 18 National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), The drawbacks of the selective industrial policy began to appear, especially its radical means, government intervention in alternative market choices, local protection to curb market competition, and the development of large enterprises through mergers and acquisitions of emerging small and medium-sized enterprises. The pursuit of rapid growth has led to overcapacity in some industries, and the current economic development has entered a new normal. This paper analyzes the influence of Chinese industrial policy on the innovation behavior of enterprises and its internal mechanism. But it is only the significant increase in non-invention patents, the pursuit of "quantity" and the neglect of "quality"; and when companies expect to receive more government subsidies and tax incentives, their patent applications, especially non-invention patents, have increased significantly. The fiscal and tax means of selective industrial policy enable enterprises to innovate for "looking for support". Further analysis of enterprises' grouping shows that the above phenomenon is only in the state-owned enterprise group. This indicates that the selective industrial policy only encourages enterprises to innovate strategically, enterprises increase innovation "quantity" for "seeking support", and innovation "quality" does not improve significantly. The increase of patent application for invention can improve the market value of enterprises, promote technological progress and substantial innovation to obtain competitive advantage to promote the development of enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：F120;F273.1;F279.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;越擬訂優(yōu)惠產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;1994年08期

2 馮飛;關(guān)于產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的研究與思考[J];物資流通研究;2000年10期

3 ;產(chǎn)業(yè)政策簡介[J];安徽決策咨詢;2000年07期

4 ;國家將推出五類產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];勘察科學(xué)技術(shù);2001年04期

5 志文;國家將推出五類產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];煤炭加工與綜合利用;2001年04期

6 ;我國將推出5種類型產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];鐵道物資科學(xué)管理;2001年02期

7 楊鵬;產(chǎn)業(yè)政策在中國的境遇——一位基層官員的實(shí)踐體會(huì)[J];戰(zhàn)略與管理;2001年02期

8 謝光飛;2003年產(chǎn)業(yè)政策重點(diǎn)圈定[J];政策w，

本文編號(hào)：1576885