【摘要】：深圳商事主體登記改革使得商事主體的設(shè)立門檻降低,隨之而來(lái)的商事主體數(shù)量的井噴式增長(zhǎng)對(duì)商事主體的監(jiān)管帶來(lái)了新的挑戰(zhàn),市場(chǎng)主體呈現(xiàn)多元化,市場(chǎng)運(yùn)作模式復(fù)雜多樣。在對(duì)深圳市場(chǎng)主體的日常監(jiān)管中發(fā)現(xiàn),深圳市食品安全問(wèn)題屢禁不止、部分企業(yè)唯利是圖不講誠(chéng)信、不少馳名品牌被制假售假者“傍名牌”。為深圳市市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)保駕護(hù)航的市場(chǎng)監(jiān)督部門在履職到位上面臨嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn),由于群眾的法律意識(shí)、執(zhí)法人員的執(zhí)法水平以及體制機(jī)制問(wèn)題導(dǎo)致在監(jiān)管過(guò)程中監(jiān)管手段匱乏,監(jiān)管力度薄弱,監(jiān)管效果不理想。為了更好的找出深圳市商事主體監(jiān)管存在的癥結(jié),本文借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家市對(duì)市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),進(jìn)一步分析深圳市商事主體“監(jiān)管難”的根源,優(yōu)化解決方案。本文從概念釋義出發(fā),通過(guò)對(duì)市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管面臨外部原因分析,提出與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的解決方案;通過(guò)分析內(nèi)部原因,從人員配備、完善制度的角度出發(fā),統(tǒng)籌三個(gè)方面來(lái)健全深圳市商事主體的質(zhì)量監(jiān)管、效率監(jiān)管機(jī)制:一是在監(jiān)管資源配置方面,建議深圳市市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管委重心下調(diào),由人事處牽頭優(yōu)化機(jī)構(gòu)調(diào)整,人力、物力、財(cái)力向監(jiān)管基層傾斜;二是在監(jiān)管方式方面,通過(guò)優(yōu)化傳統(tǒng)網(wǎng)格及“雙隨機(jī)”監(jiān)管,加強(qiáng)信用監(jiān)管;三是在處理外部關(guān)系方面,要積極跟地方政府聯(lián)動(dòng)執(zhí)法,提高執(zhí)法效力,樹立深圳市市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管的執(zhí)法權(quán)威。通過(guò)種種努力,使得肩負(fù)執(zhí)法任務(wù)的基層監(jiān)管所和各業(yè)務(wù)科室,積極的履職到位,完善好商事主體監(jiān)管工作的最后一環(huán),維護(hù)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序,保障深圳經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康有序的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The reform of commercial subject registration in Shenzhen has lowered the threshold for the establishment of commercial subject. The following blowout growth in the number of commercial subjects has brought new challenges to the supervision of commercial subjects and diversified market subjects. The market operation model is complex and diverse. In the daily supervision of the main body of the Shenzhen market, it is found that the food safety problems in Shenzhen are not forbidden, some enterprises are profit-seeking and not honest, and many well-known brands are faked, sold and sold "near famous brands". The market supervision departments that provide escort for the market economy in Shenzhen are facing severe challenges in carrying out their duties. Due to the legal consciousness of the masses, the law enforcement level of law enforcement personnel and the problems of the system and mechanism, the supervision means are lacking in the process of supervision. Weak supervision, supervision effect is not ideal. In order to better find out the crux of the supervision of commercial subject in Shenzhen, this paper draws lessons from the successful experience of market supervision in developed countries, further analyzes the root cause of the "difficult supervision" of commercial subject in Shenzhen, and optimizes the solution. Starting from the concept interpretation, through the analysis of the external reasons of the market supervision, this paper puts forward the solution of keeping pace with the times, through the analysis of the internal reasons, from the point of view of staffing, perfecting the system, Coordinating three aspects to improve the quality supervision and efficiency supervision mechanism of commercial subjects in Shenzhen: first, in terms of the allocation of regulatory resources, it is suggested that the focus of the Shenzhen Market Supervision Committee should be lowered, and the personnel Department should take the lead in optimizing the organization's adjustment, manpower and material resources. Financial resources are tilted towards the grass-roots level of supervision; second, in terms of regulatory methods, credit supervision should be strengthened by optimizing the traditional grid and "double random" supervision; third, in dealing with external relations, it is necessary to actively cooperate with local governments to enforce the law and improve the effectiveness of law enforcement. Establish the law enforcement authority of market supervision in Shenzhen. Through all kinds of efforts, we can make the grass-roots supervision offices and business departments that shoulder the task of enforcing the law to carry out their duties actively, perfect the last part of the supervision work of commercial subjects, safeguard the order of market economy, and ensure the healthy and orderly development of Shenzhen's economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F203.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈玉梅;;積極順應(yīng)改革形勢(shì) 推進(jìn)工作轉(zhuǎn)型創(chuàng)新[J];工商行政管理;2014年02期

2 ;公開違法行為 加強(qiáng)市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管[J];工商行政管理;2013年24期

3 王義明;;關(guān)于提升工商執(zhí)法辦案綜合效果的思考[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2012年11期

4 邱本;;論市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管法的基本問(wèn)題[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2012年03期

5 王旭;;淺談工商管理在企業(yè)信用管理體系構(gòu)建[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年02期

6 石亞軍;施正文;;我國(guó)行政管理體制改革中的“部門利益”問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2011年05期

7 孫文序;;關(guān)于流通領(lǐng)域商品質(zhì)量監(jiān)督管理的思考[J];工商行政管理;2009年14期

8 陳季修;;工商行政管理職能論析[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2009年01期

9 齊明山;;創(chuàng)新監(jiān)管體制 促進(jìn)科學(xué)監(jiān)管[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2006年04期

10 劉小華;;公司非破產(chǎn)清算制度的缺陷及其完善[J];福建法學(xué);2005年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王世鋒;;創(chuàng)新辦案模式 提升執(zhí)法效能[A];工商行政管理論文集（2014年度）[C];2014年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉玉亭;;關(guān)于寬進(jìn)嚴(yán)管“嚴(yán)管”的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[N];中國(guó)工商報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳世良;我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型期社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 徐瑤;我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息行政監(jiān)管問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)人民解放軍軍事醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院;2013年

2 張欣;市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管中的政策規(guī)避研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

3 于曉燕;工商行政管理市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管政策執(zhí)行研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

4 程勝利;當(dāng)代中國(guó)市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管問(wèn)題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2219755