本文選題：海綿城市 + 物有所值定量評價(jià)　； 參考：《北京建筑大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年,采用PPP模式進(jìn)行海綿城市項(xiàng)目建設(shè)受到我國政府大力支持與推廣。但對于具體海綿城市項(xiàng)目,應(yīng)當(dāng)首先判別PPP模式在此項(xiàng)目中的適用性。物有所值定量評價(jià)是通過一定的計(jì)算流程得出量化數(shù)值,并判定城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施或公共服務(wù)是否適用于PPP模式的評價(jià)方法,在國外部分國家或地區(qū)已經(jīng)具備比較完善的評價(jià)體系,而我國雖然出臺了《PPP物有所值評價(jià)指引(試行)》,但沒有對物有所值定量評價(jià)的流程、參數(shù)及方法進(jìn)行詳盡的說明與解釋。另外,海綿城市涵蓋多種類型的建設(shè)項(xiàng)目,綜合性很強(qiáng),較一般城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目有一定的特殊性,在進(jìn)行物有所值定量評價(jià)時(shí)需要特殊考慮,而我國針對于海綿城市項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)的研究還沒有開展。本文對國外較成熟的物有所值定量評價(jià)體系進(jìn)行梳理,結(jié)合我國實(shí)際情況、相關(guān)政策文件及海綿城市項(xiàng)目的具體特性,對海綿城市項(xiàng)目在物有所值定量評價(jià)中涉及到的參數(shù)進(jìn)行概念界定、流程梳理、計(jì)算方法探索等,構(gòu)建出專門針對我國海綿城市項(xiàng)目的物有所值定量評價(jià)模型。希望能夠?yàn)楹＞d城市項(xiàng)目是否適用于PPP模式提供客觀規(guī)范的判定依據(jù),并對今后相關(guān)研究具有一定的指導(dǎo)意義。首先對海綿城市、PPP模式和物有所值評價(jià)這三方面的定義、相關(guān)政策、特點(diǎn)等進(jìn)行闡述,重點(diǎn)總結(jié)了海綿城市項(xiàng)目類型,并按照建設(shè)內(nèi)容和建設(shè)地點(diǎn)對其進(jìn)行分類;為海綿城市項(xiàng)目推薦適用的PPP運(yùn)作模式;指出我國物有所值定量評價(jià)問題等,為本文研究提供理論基礎(chǔ)。其次,通過分析總結(jié)國外較成熟的物有所值定量評價(jià)方法,結(jié)合我國實(shí)際情況、相關(guān)政策文件及海綿城市項(xiàng)目的具體特性,建立評價(jià)流程規(guī)范、計(jì)算方法清晰的海綿城市項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)模型。在評價(jià)模型中加入外部效應(yīng)收益、項(xiàng)目公司分紅等參數(shù),并對折現(xiàn)率、運(yùn)營維護(hù)成本和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)量化這三個(gè)物有所值定量評價(jià)中的關(guān)鍵要素分別進(jìn)行詳細(xì)論述,使其選取或計(jì)算更加適應(yīng)海綿城市項(xiàng)目的物有所值定量評價(jià)。最后,以某地海綿城市項(xiàng)目為案例,進(jìn)行物有所值定量評價(jià)實(shí)證。利用本文構(gòu)建的海綿城市項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)模型,計(jì)算出此案例最終的物有所值量化數(shù)值(VFM值),并通過該結(jié)果判定此海綿城市項(xiàng)目是否適用于PPP模式。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the construction of sponge city project based on PPP model has been strongly supported and popularized by our government. However, for a specific sponge city project, the applicability of PPP model in this project should be judged first. The quantitative evaluation of value for money is to get the quantitative value through a certain calculation process and determine whether the urban infrastructure or public service is applicable to the PPP model. It has a relatively perfect evaluation system in some foreign countries or regions. Although our country has issued "PPP value for money evaluation guideline" (trial), but has not carried on the detailed explanation and the explanation to the flow, the parameter and the method of the quantitative evaluation of the value for money. In addition, spongy cities cover many types of construction projects, which are highly comprehensive and have certain particularities compared with general urban infrastructure projects. Special consideration is needed when carrying out quantitative evaluation of value for money. However, the quantitative evaluation of value for money for sponge city projects has not been carried out in China. This paper combs the mature quantitative evaluation system of value for money abroad, combined with the actual situation of our country, relevant policy documents and the specific characteristics of sponge city projects. This paper defines the concept of the parameters involved in the quantitative evaluation of the value for money of the sponge city project, combs the process and explores the calculation methods, and constructs a quantitative evaluation model of the value for money specially for the sponge city project in China. It is hoped that it can provide an objective and normative basis for judging whether the Sponge City Project is applicable to the PPP model, and it has certain guiding significance for the related research in the future. Firstly, the definition, relevant policies and characteristics of PPP model and value for money evaluation of spongy city are expounded, and the types of spongy city projects are summarized, and classified according to the content and location of construction. This paper recommends the suitable PPP operation mode for sponge city project, points out the problem of quantitative evaluation of value for money in China, and provides the theoretical basis for the research of this paper. Secondly, by analyzing and summarizing the mature quantitative evaluation methods of value for money abroad, combining with the actual situation of our country, the relevant policy documents and the specific characteristics of the sponge city project, the evaluation process standard is established. The value for money quantitative evaluation model of sponge city project with clear calculation method. In the evaluation model, the key factors of the quantitative evaluation of value for money are discussed in detail, such as the external effect income, the dividends of the project company, and the discount rate, the cost of operation and maintenance, and the quantification of risk, which are the three key factors in the quantitative evaluation of value for money. Make its selection or calculation more suitable for the sponge city project value for money quantitative evaluation. Finally, taking a sponge city project as a case, quantitative evaluation of value for money is carried out. Using the quantitative evaluation model of the sponge city project value for money, the final value of value for money is calculated, and the result is used to determine whether the sponge city project is suitable for the PPP model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F283;TU992;F299.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡曉輝;;對當(dāng)前“PPP熱”的冷思考[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2017年05期

2 耿瀟;趙楊;車伍;;對海綿城市建設(shè)PPP模式的思考[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2017年01期

3 滿莉;李雨霏;;用PPP模式建設(shè)海綿城市[J];水資源保護(hù);2016年06期

4 歐陽如琳;程哲;蔡文婷;溫婷;劉昌明;;從中美案例經(jīng)驗(yàn)談海綿城市PPP模式的關(guān)鍵實(shí)施要點(diǎn)[J];中國水利;2016年21期

5 王玉萍;;淺析PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)要點(diǎn)——以城市停車設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目為例[J];上海建設(shè)科技;2016年03期

6 魏保平;柏云;;PPP模式驅(qū)動海綿城市建設(shè)——以鎮(zhèn)江市海綿城市項(xiàng)目為例[J];中國投資;2016年06期

7 彭明;;海綿城市理論及其在城市規(guī)劃中的實(shí)踐構(gòu)想[J];建材與裝飾;2016年05期

8 俞孔堅(jiān);李迪華;袁弘;傅微;喬青;王思思;;“海綿城市”理論與實(shí)踐[J];城市規(guī)劃;2015年06期

9 彭為;陳建國;Cui Qingbin;穆詩煜;;公私合作項(xiàng)目物有所值評估比較與分析[J];軟科學(xué);2014年05期

10 余彬;朱永忠;;基于集值統(tǒng)計(jì)法在項(xiàng)目評估中的可信性檢驗(yàn)[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張家誠;考慮不確定性的PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2016年

2 司彤;我國PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評價(jià)研究[D];中國財(cái)政科學(xué)研究院;2016年

3 張曉然;城市軌道交通PPP項(xiàng)目的物有所值定量評價(jià)研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2016年

4 郭上;我國PPP模式物有所值評價(jià)研究[D];財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所;2015年

5 吳曉麗;鐵路PPP項(xiàng)目融資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)識別與量化管理研究[D];蘭州交通大學(xué);2015年

6 李佳嶸;基于我國國情的PSC評價(jià)體系研究[D];清華大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1981885